Advertisement

Complexity of Plant Volatile-Mediated Interactions Beyond the Third Trophic Level

  • Erik H. PoelmanEmail author
  • Martine Kos
Chapter
Part of the Signaling and Communication in Plants book series (SIGCOMM)

Abstract

Food chains of plant-associated communities typically reach beyond three trophic levels. The predators and parasitoids in the third trophic level are under attack by top predators or parasitised by hyperparasitoids. These higher trophic level organisms respond to plant volatiles in search of their prey or host. Thereby, plant volatiles affect community processes such as competition and intraguild predation among predators and parasitoids at the terminal end of the food chain. The response of fourth trophic level organisms to plant volatiles potentially reduces the benefit of these volatiles as indirect defence for the plant. In the application of parasitoids as biological control agents of herbivore pests, hyperparasitoids may diminish the effectiveness of parasitoids. Detailed understanding of the use of plant odours by hyperparasitoids may provide tools to further optimise biological control.

Keywords

Biological Control Biological Control Agent Plant Volatile Host Location Intraguild Predation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Acebes AL, Messing RH (2013) Comparative susceptibility to hyperparasitism of Binodoxys communis and Aphidius colemani, primary aphid parasitoids introduced to Hawaii. Biol Control 65:286–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amo L, Jansen JJ, van Dam NM, Dicke M, Visser ME (2013) Birds exploit herbivore-induced plant volatiles to locate herbivorous prey. Ecol Lett 16:1348–1355CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Askew AR, Shaw MR (1986) Parasitoid communities: their size, structure and development. In: Waage J, Greathead D (eds) Insect parasitoids. Academic Press, London, pp 225–264Google Scholar
  4. Beddington JR, Hammond PS (1977) Dynamics of host–parasite hyperparasite interactions. J Anim Ecol 46:811–821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Blande JD, Pickett JA, Poppy GM (2007) A comparison of semiochemically mediated interactions involving specialist and generalist Brassica-feeding aphids and the braconid parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae. J Chem Ecol 33:767–779CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bottrell DG, Barbosa P, Gould F (1998) Manipulating natural enemies by plant variety selection and modification: a realistic strategy? Annu Rev Entomol 43:347–367CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Bradburne RP, Mithen R (2000) Glucosinolate genetics and the attraction of the aphid parasitoid Diaeretiella rapae to Brassica. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 267:89–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brodeur J, Rosenheim JA (2000) Intraguild interactions in aphid parasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 97:93–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Buitenhuis R, McNeil JN, Boivin G, Brodeur J (2004) The role of honeydew in host searching of aphid hyperparasitoids. J Chem Ecol 30:273–285CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Buitenhuis R, Vet LEM, Boivin G, Brodeur J (2005) Foraging behaviour at the fourth trophic level: a comparative study of host location in aphid hyperparasitoids. Entomol Exp Appl 114:107–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Colfer RG, Rosenheim JA (2001) Predation on immature parasitoids and its impact on aphid suppression. Oecologia 126:292–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook SM, Khan ZR, Pickett JA (2007) The use of push–pull strategies in integrated pest management. Annu Rev Entomol 52:375–400CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Dicke M (1999) Are herbivore-induced plant volatiles reliable indicators of herbivore identity to foraging carnivorous arthropods? Entomol Exp Appl 91:131–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fatouros NE, van Loon JJA, Hordijk KA, Smid HM, Dicke M (2005) Herbivore-induced plant volatiles mediate in-flight host discrimination by parasitoids. J Chem Ecol 31:2033–2047CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Gols R (2014) Direct and indirect chemical defences against insects in a multitrophic framework. Plant Cell Environ 37:1741–1752CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Gols R, Wagenaar R, Poelman EH, Kruidhof M, van Loon JJA, Harvey JA (2015) Fitness consequences of indirect plant defence in the annual Sinapis arvensis. Funct Ecol 29:1019–1025CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gomez-Marco F, Urbaneja A, Jaques JA, Rugman-Jones PF, Stouthamer R, Tena A (2015) Untangling the aphid–parasitoid food web in citrus: can hyperparasitoids disrupt biological control? Biol Control 81:111–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gouinguene S, Degen T, Turlings TCJ (2001) Variability in herbivore-induced odour emissions among maize cultivars and their wild ancestors (teosinte). Chemoecology 11:9–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harmel N, Almohamad R, Fauconnier ML, Du Jardin P, Verheggen F, Marlier M, Haubruge E, Francis F (2007) Role of terpenes from aphid-infested potato on searching and oviposition behavior of Episyrphus balteatus. Insect Sci 14:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Harvey JA, Gols R, Vet LEM, Kruidhof HM (2012) Development of a hyperparasitoid wasp in different stages of its primary parasitoid and secondary herbivore hosts. J Insect Physiol 58:1463–1468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Harvey JA, Poelman EH, Tanaka T (2013) Intrinsic inter- and intra-specific competition in parasitoid wasps. Annu Rev Entomol 58:333–351CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Hoballah MEF, Tamo C, Turlings TCJ (2002) Differential attractiveness of induced odors emitted by eight maize varieties for the parasitoid Cotesia marginiventris: is quality or quantity important? J Chem Ecol 28:951–968CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Holler C, Borgemeister C, Haardt H, Powell W (1993) The relationship between primary parasitoids and hyperparasitoids of cereal aphids: an analysis of field data. J Anim Ecol 62:12–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Holler C, Micha SG, Schulz S, Francke W, Pickett JA (1994) Enemy-induced dispersal in a parasitic wasp. Experientia 50:182–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. James DG (2005) Further field evaluation of synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles as attractants for beneficial insects. J Chem Ecol 31:481–495CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. James DG, Grasswitz TR (2005) Synthetic herbivore-induced plant volatiles increase field captures of parasitic wasps. Biocontrol 50:871–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. James DG, Price TS (2004) Field-testing of methyl salicylate for recruitment and retention of beneficial insects in grapes and hops. J Chem Ecol 30:1613–1628CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Kaplan I (2012) Attracting carnivorous arthropods with plant volatiles: the future of biocontrol or playing with fire? Biol Control 60:77–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kessler A, Heil M (2011) The multiple faces of indirect defences and their agents of natural selection. Funct Ecol 25:348–357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kohler GR, Stiefel VL, Wallin KF, Ross DW (2008) Parasitoids reared from predators of Hemlock Woolly Adelgid (Hemiptera: Adelgidae), and the Hymenopterous parasitoid community on Western Hemlock in the Pacific Northwest. Environ Entomol 37:1477–1487CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Kos M, Houshyani B, Overeem AJ, Bouwmeester HJ, Weldegergis BT, van Loon JJA, Dicke M, Vet LEM (2013) Genetic engineering of plant volatile terpenoids: effects on a herbivore, a predator and a parasitoid. Pest Manag Sci 69:302–311CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Mackauer M, Volkl W (1993) Regulation of aphid populations by aphidiid wasps: does parasitoid foraging behavior or hyperparasitism limit impact? Oecologia 94:339–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mäntylä E, Klemola T, Haukioja E (2004) Attraction of willow warblers to sawfly-damaged mountain birches: novel function of inducible plant defences? Ecol Lett 7:915–918CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mäntylä E, Blande JD, Klemola T (2014) Does application of methyl jasmonate to birch mimic herbivory and attract insectivorous birds in nature? Arthropod Plant Interact 8:143–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Meyhofer R, Klug T (2002) Intraguild predation on the aphid parasitoid Lysiphlebus fabarum (Marshall) (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae): mortality risks and behavioral decisions made under the threats of predation. Biol Control 25:239–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Müller CB, Brodeur J (2002) Intraguild predation in biological control and conservation biology. Biol Control 25:216–223CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Nofemela RS (2013) The effect of obligate hyperparasitoids on biological control: differential vulnerability of primary parasitoids to hyperparasitism can mitigate trophic cascades. Biol Control 65:218–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Orre GUS, Wratten SD, Jonsson M, Hale RJ (2010) Effects of an herbivore-induced plant volatile on arthropods from three trophic levels in brassicas. Biol Control 53:62–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Petersen G, Matthiesen C, Francke W, Wyss U (2000) Hyperparasitoid volatiles as possible foraging behaviour determinants in the aphid parasitoid Aphidius uzbekistanicus (Hymenoptera: Aphidiidae). Eur J Entomol 97:545–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Pineda A, Morales I, Marcos-Garcia MA, Fereres A (2007) Oviposition avoidance of parasitized aphid colonies by the syrphid predator Episyrphus balteatus mediated by different cues. Biol Control 42:274–280CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Poelman EH (2015) From induced resistance to defence in plant–insect interactions. Entomol Exp Appl 157:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Poelman EH, Zheng SJ, Zhang Z, Heemskerk NM, Cortesero A-M, Dicke M (2011) Parasitoid-specific induction of plant responses to parasitized herbivores affects colonization by subsequent herbivores. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 108:19647–19652CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  43. Poelman EH, Bruinsma M, Zhu F, Weldegergis BT, Boursault AE, Jongema Y, van Loon JJA, Vet LEM, Harvey JA, Dicke M (2012) Hyperparasitoids use herbivore-induced plant volatiles to locate their parasitoid host. PLoS Biol 10:e1001435CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Poelman EH, Harvey JA, van Loon JJA, Vet LEM, Dicke M (2013) Variation in herbivore-induced plant volatiles corresponds with spatial heterogeneity in the level of parasitoid competition and parasitoid exposure to hyperparasitism. Funct Ecol 27:1107–1116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Powell W, Pickett JA (2003) Manipulation of parasitoids for aphid pest management: progress and prospects. Pest Manag Sci 59:149–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Price PW, Bouton CE, Gross P, Mcpheron BA, Thompson JN, Weis AE (1980) Interactions among 3 trophic levels—influence of plants on interactions between insect herbivores and natural enemies. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 11:41–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rodriguez-Saona C, Kaplan I, Braasch J, Chinnasamy D, Williams L (2011) Field responses of predaceous arthropods to methyl salicylate: a meta-analysis and case study in cranberries. Biol Control 59:294–303CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rosenheim JA (2005) Intraguild predation of Orius tristicolor by Geocoris spp. and the paradox of irruptive spider mite dynamics in California cotton. Biol Control 32:172–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rosenheim JA, Kaya HK, Ehler LE, Marois JJ, Jaffee BA (1995) Intraguild predation among biological-control agents: theory and evidence. Biol Control 5:303–335CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rotheray GE (1981) Host searching and oviposition behavior of some parasitoids of Aphidophagous syrphidae. Ecol Entomol 6:79–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Schooler SS, De Barro P, Ives AR (2011) The potential for hyperparasitism to compromise biological control: why don’t hyperparasitoids drive their primary parasitoid hosts extinct? Biol Control 58:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Schuman MC, Barthel K, Baldwin IT (2012) Herbivory-induced volatiles function as defenses increasing fitness of the native plant Nicotiana attenuata in nature. Elife 1:e00007CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  53. Singh R, Srivastava PN (1987a) Factors associated with host location by Alloxysta pleuralis (Cameron), a hyperparasitoid of Trioxys indicus Subba Rao and Sharma (Alloxystidae: Hymenoptera/Aphidiidae: Hymenoptera). Entomon 12:325–328Google Scholar
  54. Singh R, Srivastava PN (1987b) Potential host-habitat location by Alloxysta pleuralis (Cameron) (Alloxystidae: Hymenoptera). Z Angew Zool 74:337–341Google Scholar
  55. Smallegange RC, van Loon JJA, Blatt SE, Harvey JA, Dicke M (2008) Parasitoid load affects plant fitness in a tritrophic system. Entomol Exp Appl 128:172–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Steidle JLM, van Loon JJA (2002) Chemoecology of parasitoid and predator oviposition behaviour. In: Hilker M, Meiners T (eds) Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell, Berlin, pp 291–317Google Scholar
  57. Stiling P (1993) Why do natural enemies fail in classical biological control programs? Am Entomol 39:31–37CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stork WFJ, Weinhold A, Baldwin IT (2011) Trichomes as dangerous lollipops: do lizards also use caterpillar body and frass odor to optimize their foraging? Plant Signal Behav 6:1893–1896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Sullivan DJ (1987) Insect hyperparasitism. Annu Rev Entomol 32:49–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Sullivan DJ, Volkl W (1999) Hyperparasitism: multitrophic ecology and behavior. Annu Rev Entomol 44:291–315CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Takabayashi J, Sabelis MW, Janssen A, Shiojiri K, van Wijk M (2006) Can plants betray the presence of multiple herbivore species to predators and parasitoids? The role of learning in phytochemical information networks. Ecol Res 21:3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. van Lenteren JC (2012) The state of commercial augmentative biological control: plenty of natural enemies, but a frustrating lack of uptake. Biocontrol 57:1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. van Loon JJA, de Boer JG, Dicke M (2000) Parasitoid-plant mutualism: parasitoid attack of herbivore increases plant reproduction. Entomol Exp Appl 97:219–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Vance-Chalcraft HD, Rosenheim JA, Vonesh JR, Osenberg CW, Sih A (2007) The influence of intraguild predation on prey suppression and prey release: a meta-analysis. Ecology 88:2689–2696CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Verheggen FJ, Arnaud L, Bartram S, Gohy M, Haubruge E (2008) Aphid and plant volatiles induce oviposition in an aphidophagous hoverfly. J Chem Ecol 34:301–307CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Vet LEM, Dicke M (1992) Ecology of infochemical use by natural enemies in a tritrophic context. Annu Rev Entomol 37:141–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Volkl W, Sullivan DJ (2000) Foraging behaviour, host plant and host location in the aphid hyperparasitoid Euneura augarus. Entomol Exp Appl 97:47–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Vos M, Hemerik L (2003) Linking foraging behavior to lifetime reproductive success for an insect parasitoid: adaptation to host distributions. Behav Ecol 14:236–245CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Zhu JW, Park KC (2005) Methyl salicylate, a soybean aphid-induced plant volatile attractive to the predator Coccinella septempunctata. J Chem Ecol 31:1733–1746CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Zhu F, Weldegergis BT, Lhie B, Harvey JA, Dicke M, Poelman EH (2014) Body odors of parasitized caterpillars give away the presence of parasitoid larvae to their primary hyperparasitoid enemies. J Chem Ecol 40:986–995CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  71. Zhu F, Broekgaarden C, Weldegergis BT, Harvey JA, Vosman B, Dicke M, Poelman EH (2015) Parasitism overrides herbivore identity allowing hyperparasitoids to locate their parasitoid host by using herbivore-induced plant volatiles. Mol Ecol 24:2886–2899CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of EntomologyWageningen UniversityWageningenThe Netherlands
  2. 2.Department of Terrestrial EcologyNetherlands Institute of Ecology (NIOO-KNAW)WageningenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations