Advertisement

Deciphering Chemical Language of Plant Communication: Synthesis and Future Research Directions

  • Robert GlinwoodEmail author
  • James D. Blande
Chapter
Part of the Signaling and Communication in Plants book series (SIGCOMM)

Abstract

Volatile chemicals emitted by plants constitute cues and signals that provide extensive information to myriad organisms in the community. Chapters in this book provide detail on the production and emission of volatile compounds, a variety of volatile-mediated interactions involving a multitude of organisms, and recent developments on the detection of volatile compounds by plants. In this chapter a synthesis of key points and recurring themes from the previous chapters is provided, and future research directions are identified.

Keywords

Plant Communication Plant Volatile Floral Scent Volatile Chemical Chemical Background 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Arneth A, Niinemets Ü (2010) Induced BVOCs: how to bug our models? Trends Plant Sci 15:118–125CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Copolovici L, Kännaste A, Remmel T, Niinemets Ü (2014) Volatile organic compound emissions from Alnus glutinosa under interacting drought and herbivory stresses. Environ Exp Bot 100:55–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Erb M, Veyrat N, Robert CAM, Xu H, Frey M, Ton J, Turlings TCJ (2015) Indole is an essential herbivore-induced volatile priming signal in maize. Nat Commun 6:6273CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Fenske MP, Hewett Hazelton KD, Hempton AK, Shim JS, Yamamoto BM, Riffell JA, Imaizumi T (2015) Circadian clock gene LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL directly regulates the timing of floral scent emission in Petunia. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 31:9775–9780CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Helms AM, De Moraes CM, Tooker JF, Mescher MC (2013) Exposure of Solidago altissima plants to volatile emissions of an insect antagonist (Eurosta solidaginis) deters subsequent herbivory. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 110:199–204CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Helms AM, De Moraes CM, Mescher MC, Tooker JF (2014) The volatile emission of Eurosta solidaginis primes herbivore-induced volatile production in Solidago altissima and does not directly deter insect feeding. BMC Plant Biol 14:173CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Junker RR, Tholl D (2013) Volatile organic compound mediated interactions at the plant–microbe interface. J Chem Ecol 39:810–825CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Karban R, Yang LH, Edwards KF (2014a) Volatile communication between plants that affects herbivory: a meta-analysis. Ecol Lett 17:44–52CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Karban R, Wetzel WC, Shiojiri K, Ishizaki S, Ramirez SR, Blande JD (2014b) Deciphering the language of plant communication: volatile chemotypes of sagebrush. New Phytol 204:380–385CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Lee K, Seo PJ (2014) Airborne signals from salt-stressed Arabidopsis plants trigger salinity tolerance in neighbouring plants. Plant Signal Behav 9:e28392CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Mäntylä E, Alessio GA, Blande JD, Heijari J, Holopainen JK, Laaksonen T, Piirtola P, Klemola T (2008) From plants to birds: higher avian predation rates in trees responding to insect herbivory. PLoS One 3(7):e2832CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Peñuelas J, Farré-Armengol G, Llusià J, Gargallo-Garriga A, Rico L, Sardans J, Terradas J, Filella I (2014) Removal of floral microbiota reduces floral terpene emissions. Sci Rep 4:4. doi: 10.1038/srep06727 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pierre PS, Jansen JJ, Hordijk CA, van Dam NM, Cortesero AM, Dugravot S (2011) Differences in volatile profiles of turnip plants subjected to single and dual herbivory above- and belowground. J Chem Ecol 37:368–377CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Stam JM, Kroes A, Li YH, Gols R, van Loon JJA, Poelman EH, Dicke M (2014) Plant interactions with multiple insect herbivores: from community to genes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 65:689–713CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Stork WFJ, Weinhold A, Baldwin IT (2011) Trichomes as dangerous lollipops: do lizards also use caterpillar body and frass odor to optimize their foraging? Plant Signal Behav 6:1893–1896CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Sugimoto K, Matsui K, Iijima Y, Akakabe Y, Muramoto S, Ozawa R, Uefune M, Sasaki R, Alamgir KM, Akitake S, Nobuke T, Galis I, Aoki K, Shibata D, Takabayashi J (2014) Intake and transformation to a glycoside of (Z)-3-hexenol from infested neighbors reveals a mode of plant odor reception and defense. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 111:7144–7149CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  17. Yao YL, Danna CH, Zemp FJ, Titov V, Ciftci ON, Przybylski R, Ausubel FM, Kovalchuk I (2011) UV-C-irradiated Arabidopsis and tobacco emit volatiles that trigger genomic instability in neighbouring plants. Plant Cell 23:3824–3852CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Yon F, Joo Y, Llorca LC, Rothe E, Baldwin IT, Kim S-G (2016) Silencing Nicotiana attenuata LHY and ZTL alters circadian rhythms in flowers. New Phytol 209:1058–1066CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Zebelo SA, Matsui K, Ozawa R, Maffei ME (2012) Plasma membrane potential depolarization and cytosolic calcium flux are early events involved in tomato (Solanum lycopersicon) plant-to-plant communication. Plant Sci 196:93–100CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Crop Production EcologySwedish University of Agricultural SciencesUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Department of Environmental and Biological SciencesUniversity of Eastern FinlandKuopioFinland

Personalised recommendations