Abstract
This paper reports on observations and interviews conducted through fieldwork at an offshore supply vessel to investigate offshore operational systems in use. The intention with the fieldwork was to get a better understanding of the knowledge and relationship that operators living in workspaces to use modern digital technologies. The findings are presented and analyzed through the lens of actor-network theory (ANT). The analysis shows that systems are involved in three main networks during different operations which I call host actor-network, parallel actor network and reconfigured host actor network. It also shows that these relationships contribute to dynamically changing safety issues on board, such as risky operations during tasks between the offshore support vessel and the oil platform. This paper addresses the critical issues of how different social, digital technologies and workspaces connected as networks affect the character of safety operations and the implications for the design of marine technology in workspaces and systems in a digital environment on a ship’s bridge.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Forskningsrådet (2012) Work programme MAROFF, The Research Council of Norway
Latour B (1999) On recalling ANT. Sociol Rev 47(S1):15–25
Hanseth O, Aanestad M, Berg M (2004) Guest editors’ introduction: actor‐network theory and information systems. What’s so special? Inform Technol People 17(2):116–123
Storni C (2010) Unpacking design practices: the notion of thing in the making of artifacts. Sci Tech Hum Values 37:88
Aanestad M (2003) The camera as an actor design-in-use of telemedicine infrastructure in surgery. Comput Supported Coop Work 12(1):1–20
Moser I, Law J (1999) Good passages, bad passages. Sociol Rev 47(S1):196–219
Pan Y (2015) Evaluating the interactive relations of complex systems: offshore operations as research resources. In: 18th annual dilemmas international research conference, Marcus Wallenberg. In press
Pan Y (2016) Cooperative systems for marine operations using actor-network design: a discussion. In: 20th international conference on computer supported cooperative work and design, IEEE. Accepted
Pan Y, Finken S, Kom S (2015) Are current usability methods viable for maritime operation systems? In: The eighth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions, IARIA. pp 161–167
Waldo J (2006) On system design. In: Technical report 2006-062006, Sun Microsystems Laboratories
Leonard BA, Starzinger E (2006) Simple but sophisticated: an alternative approach to boat systems design. http://www.bethandevans.com/pdf/SimpleBoatsystem.pdf
Peiwei M, Scacchi W (1991) Modeling articulation work in software engineering processes in software process. pp 188–201
Woodhouse E, Patton JW (2004) Design by society: science and technology studies and the social shaping of design. Design Issues 20(3):1–12
McFarlane P, Hills M (2013) Developing immunity to flight security risk: prospective benefits from considering aviation security as a socio-technical eco-system. J Transp Secur 6(3):221–234
Bardram J (1998) Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In: ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. pp 89–98
Bossen C (2002) the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. In: ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. pp 176–185
Reddy M, Dourish C, Pratt W (2001) Inating geterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. In: ECSCW 2001: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp 239–258
Li J, Robertson T (2011) Physical space and information space: studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings. Behav Inform Technol 30(4):443–454
Pan Y, Komandur K, Finken S (2015) Complex systems, cooperative work, and usability. J Usability Stud 10(3):100–112
IMO (2004) A guide to DP-related documentation for DP vessels. International Maritime Organization, Sweden
Monteiro E (2004) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In: From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infastructures. Oxford University Press, London, pp 71–83
Mähring M et al (2004) Trojan actor‐networks and swift translation: bringing actor‐network theory to IT project escalation studies. Inform Technol People 17:210–238
Latour B (1990) On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Finn Olsen Om Aktor-Netvaerksteroi Nogle Fa Afklaringer Og Mere End Nogle Fa Forviklinger – Philos 25(3):47–64
Latour (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard UP, Cambridge, MA
Cordella A (2010) Information infrastructure: an actor-network perspective. Int J Actor-Netw Theory Technol Innov 2(1):1–27
Latour B (2007) Reassembling the social an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Akama Y (2015) Being awake to Ma: designing in between-ness as a way of becoming with. CoDesign 11(3–4):262–274
Hernes T (2010) Actor-network theory, Callon’s scallops, and process-based organization studies. In: Process, sensemaking, and orgainzing. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Callon M (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol Rev 32:196–233
Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. Macmillan, London, pp 19–34
Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1998) Changing irreversible networks: institutionalisation and infrastructure. In: European conference on information systems. pp 1–8
Lurås S, Nordby K (2014) Field studies informing ship’s bridge at the ocean industries concept lab. In: Human factors in ship design and operation. pp 1–10
Ciolfi L, Fitzpatrick G, Bannon L (2008) Setting for collaboration: the role of place. Comput Supported Coop Work 17(2–3):91–96
Schmidt K, Bannon J (1992) Taking CSCW seriously. Comput Supported Coop Work 1(1):7–40
Stanton NA et al (2010) Control room layout, human factors in the design and evaluation of central control room operations. CRC, London, pp 249–271
Suchman L (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
IDF (2013) User error: who is to blame? [cited 2016 050216]
Groth K (2008) The role of technology in video-mediated consensus meeting. Telemed Telecare 14:349–353
Acknowledgments
Thanks to reviewers and to Sisse Finken for their constrictive feedback. This research is found by the Research Council of Norway.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pan, Y. (2016). Design of Digital Environments for Operations on Vessels. In: De Angeli, A., Bannon, L., Marti, P., Bordin, S. (eds) COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33463-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33464-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)