Skip to main content

Design of Digital Environments for Operations on Vessels

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Abstract

This paper reports on observations and interviews conducted through fieldwork at an offshore supply vessel to investigate offshore operational systems in use. The intention with the fieldwork was to get a better understanding of the knowledge and relationship that operators living in workspaces to use modern digital technologies. The findings are presented and analyzed through the lens of actor-network theory (ANT). The analysis shows that systems are involved in three main networks during different operations which I call host actor-network, parallel actor network and reconfigured host actor network. It also shows that these relationships contribute to dynamically changing safety issues on board, such as risky operations during tasks between the offshore support vessel and the oil platform. This paper addresses the critical issues of how different social, digital technologies and workspaces connected as networks affect the character of safety operations and the implications for the design of marine technology in workspaces and systems in a digital environment on a ship’s bridge.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Forskningsrådet (2012) Work programme MAROFF, The Research Council of Norway

    Google Scholar 

  2. Latour B (1999) On recalling ANT. Sociol Rev 47(S1):15–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hanseth O, Aanestad M, Berg M (2004) Guest editors’ introduction: actor‐network theory and information systems. What’s so special? Inform Technol People 17(2):116–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Storni C (2010) Unpacking design practices: the notion of thing in the making of artifacts. Sci Tech Hum Values 37:88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aanestad M (2003) The camera as an actor design-in-use of telemedicine infrastructure in surgery. Comput Supported Coop Work 12(1):1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moser I, Law J (1999) Good passages, bad passages. Sociol Rev 47(S1):196–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pan Y (2015) Evaluating the interactive relations of complex systems: offshore operations as research resources. In: 18th annual dilemmas international research conference, Marcus Wallenberg. In press

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pan Y (2016) Cooperative systems for marine operations using actor-network design: a discussion. In: 20th international conference on computer supported cooperative work and design, IEEE. Accepted

    Google Scholar 

  9. Pan Y, Finken S, Kom S (2015) Are current usability methods viable for maritime operation systems? In: The eighth international conference on advances in computer-human interactions, IARIA. pp 161–167

    Google Scholar 

  10. Waldo J (2006) On system design. In: Technical report 2006-062006, Sun Microsystems Laboratories

    Google Scholar 

  11. Leonard BA, Starzinger E (2006) Simple but sophisticated: an alternative approach to boat systems design. http://www.bethandevans.com/pdf/SimpleBoatsystem.pdf

  12. Peiwei M, Scacchi W (1991) Modeling articulation work in software engineering processes in software process. pp 188–201

    Google Scholar 

  13. Woodhouse E, Patton JW (2004) Design by society: science and technology studies and the social shaping of design. Design Issues 20(3):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. McFarlane P, Hills M (2013) Developing immunity to flight security risk: prospective benefits from considering aviation security as a socio-technical eco-system. J Transp Secur 6(3):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Bardram J (1998) Designing for the dynamics of cooperative work activities. In: ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. pp 89–98

    Google Scholar 

  16. Bossen C (2002) the heterogeneity of cooperative work at a hospital ward. In: ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work. pp 176–185

    Google Scholar 

  17. Reddy M, Dourish C, Pratt W (2001) Inating geterogeneous work: information and representation in medical care. In: ECSCW 2001: Proceedings of the Seventh European Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. pp 239–258

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li J, Robertson T (2011) Physical space and information space: studies of collaboration in distributed multi-disciplinary medical team meetings. Behav Inform Technol 30(4):443–454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Pan Y, Komandur K, Finken S (2015) Complex systems, cooperative work, and usability. J Usability Stud 10(3):100–112

    Google Scholar 

  20. IMO (2004) A guide to DP-related documentation for DP vessels. International Maritime Organization, Sweden

    Google Scholar 

  21. Monteiro E (2004) Actor-network theory and information infrastructure. In: From control to drift: the dynamics of corporate information infastructures. Oxford University Press, London, pp 71–83

    Google Scholar 

  22. Mähring M et al (2004) Trojan actor‐networks and swift translation: bringing actor‐network theory to IT project escalation studies. Inform Technol People 17:210–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Latour B (1990) On actor-network theory. A few clarifications plus more than a few complications. Finn Olsen Om Aktor-Netvaerksteroi Nogle Fa Afklaringer Og Mere End Nogle Fa Forviklinger – Philos 25(3):47–64

    Google Scholar 

  24. Latour (1987) Science in action: how to follow scientists and engineers through society. Harvard UP, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  25. Cordella A (2010) Information infrastructure: an actor-network perspective. Int J Actor-Netw Theory Technol Innov 2(1):1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Latour B (2007) Reassembling the social an introduction to actor-network-theory. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  27. Akama Y (2015) Being awake to Ma: designing in between-ness as a way of becoming with. CoDesign 11(3–4):262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Hernes T (2010) Actor-network theory, Callon’s scallops, and process-based organization studies. In: Process, sensemaking, and orgainzing. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  29. Callon M (1984) Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Sociol Rev 32:196–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Callon M (1986) The sociology of an actor-network: the case of the electric vehicle. In: Callon M, Law J, Rip A (eds) Mapping the dynamics of science and technology: sociology of science in the real world. Macmillan, London, pp 19–34

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Hanseth O, Monteiro E (1998) Changing irreversible networks: institutionalisation and infrastructure. In: European conference on information systems. pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  32. Lurås S, Nordby K (2014) Field studies informing ship’s bridge at the ocean industries concept lab. In: Human factors in ship design and operation. pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  33. Ciolfi L, Fitzpatrick G, Bannon L (2008) Setting for collaboration: the role of place. Comput Supported Coop Work 17(2–3):91–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Schmidt K, Bannon J (1992) Taking CSCW seriously. Comput Supported Coop Work 1(1):7–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Stanton NA et al (2010) Control room layout, human factors in the design and evaluation of central control room operations. CRC, London, pp 249–271

    Google Scholar 

  36. Suchman L (2007) Human-machine reconfigurations plans and situated actions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

    Google Scholar 

  37. IDF (2013) User error: who is to blame? [cited 2016 050216]

    Google Scholar 

  38. Groth K (2008) The role of technology in video-mediated consensus meeting. Telemed Telecare 14:349–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Thanks to reviewers and to Sisse Finken for their constrictive feedback. This research is found by the Research Council of Norway.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yushan Pan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pan, Y. (2016). Design of Digital Environments for Operations on Vessels. In: De Angeli, A., Bannon, L., Marti, P., Bordin, S. (eds) COOP 2016: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on the Design of Cooperative Systems, 23-27 May 2016, Trento, Italy. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33464-6_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33463-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33464-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics