Abstract
Mesoamerica is a term used sometimes in cultural context, but in this article we are using it to name the land bridge between North and South America, made up of the Southern Mexico States (Chiapas, Quintana Roo, Yucatán, Campeche y Tabasco), Guatemala, Belize, El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, and Panama. With an area of approximately 755,000 square kilometers, it is one of the most heterogeneous regions of the world in terms of elevation, land forms, climate, natural ecosystems and human populations. In the general context given, the potential of Earth observation (EO) to assist the management of natural resources, biodiversity and disasters in the region is clear. In this chapter, we discuss the current state of EO applications and future perspectives related to land-use change, ecosystem dynamics and biodiversity and solid-earth hazards. We hope that this contribution can identify current and future challenges related to obtaining the biggest societal benefit of EO and suggest actions to take advantage of anticipated innovations and data availability.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
Disaster trends. Interactive graphs that show various trends and relationships within the EM-DAT data. EM-DAT: The OFDA/CRED International Disaster Database—http://www.emdat.be/disaster_trends/index.html.
References
Agresta, DIMAP, Universidad de Costa Rica, and Universidad Politécnica de Madrid (2015). Índice de cobertura como base para la estimación de la degradación y aumento de existencias de carbono, Agresta, Dimap, Universidad de Costa Rica, Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, Costa Rica.
Anderson, E., Cherrington, E., Flores, A., Pérez, J., Carrillo, R., & Sempris, E. (2008). Potential impacts of climate change on biodiversity in Central America, Mexico, Dominican Republic. Panamá: Centro del Agua del Trópico Húmedo para América Latina y el Caribe (CATHALAC).
Asner, G. P., et al. (2013). High-fidelity national carbon mapping for resource management and REDD+. Carbon Balance and Management, 8(1), 7. doi:10.1186/1750-0680-8-7.
BIOMARCC, SINAC, & GIZ (2012). Clasificación sistemas marino costeros costa Pacífica de Costa Rica. Costa Rica: BIOMARCC, SINAC, GIZ
Blackman, A. (2013). Evaluating forest conservation policies in developing countries using remote sensing data: An introduction and practical guide. Forest Policy and Economics, 34, 1–16. doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2013.04.006.
Blackman, A., Pfaff, A., & Robalino, J. (2015). Paper park performance: Mexico’s natural protected areas in the 1990s. Global Environmental Change, 31, 50–61. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.12.004.
Cartus, O., Kellndorfer, J., Walker, W., Franco, C., Bishop, J., Santos, L., & Fuentes, J. (2014). A national detailed map of forest aboveground carbon stocks in Mexico. Remote Sensing, 6(6), 5559–5588. doi:10.3390/rs6065559.
CELADE. (2004). America Latina y el Caribe: Estimaciones y proyecciones de población 1950–2050. Chile: CEPAL.
CELADE (2014). Estimaciones y proyecciones de población a largo plazo 1950–2100
Center for the Support of Native Lands, and National Geographic (2002). Indigenous peoples and natural ecosystems in Central America and Southern Mexico.
Cerdeira-Estrada, S., & López-Saldaña, G. (2011). Nuevo Sistema Satelital de Monitoreo Oceánico para México. Ciencias marinas, 37(2), 237–247.
Cherrington, E., Ek, E., Cho, P., Howell, B., Hernández, B., Anderson, E., Flores, A., García, B., Sempris, E., & Irwin D. (2010). Forest cover and deforestation in Belize: 1980–2010. Panamá: Centro del Agua del Trópico Húmedo para América Latina y el Caribe (CATHALAC)
Cherrington, E., Hernández, B., García, B., Oyuela, M. & Clemente, A. (2011). Changes in land cover and deforestation in Central America 1990–2008. Panamá: Centro del Agua del Trópico Húmedo para América Latina y el Caribe (CATHALAC).
CONAP, INAB, CONRED, & MARN (n.d.). Sistema de Información Geoespacial para Manejo de Incendios en la República de Guatemala (SIGMA-I). Guatemala: CONAP, INAB, CONRED, MARN.
CONAPO (2014). Dinámica demográfica 1990–2010 y proyecciones de población 2010–2030
Courteille, J. -C. (2015). International Charter “Space and Major Disasters” space-based information in support of relief efforts after major disasters
Dilley, M. (2005). Natural disaster hotspots: A global risk analysis, disaster risk management (series no. 5). Washington, DC: World Bank.
Flasse, S., Ceccato, P. (1996). A contextual algorithm for AVHRR fire detection. International Journal of Remote Sensing, 17(2), 419–424.
Flores, A., Anderson, E., Irwin, D., & Cherrington, E. (2012). Contributions of servir in promoting the use of space data in climate change and disaster management. Naples, Italy: International Astronautical Federation.
Gebhardt, S., et al. (2014). MAD-MEX: Automatic wall-to-wall land cover monitoring for the Mexican REDD-MRV program using all landsat data. Remote Sensing, 6(5), 3923–3943. doi:10.3390/rs6053923.
Gevorgyan, Y., & Briggs S. (2014). International charter “Space and major disasters”.
Giglio, L., Descloitres, J., Justice, C. O., & Kaufman, Y. J. (2003). An enhanced contextual fire detection algorithm for MODIS. Remote Sensing of Environment, 87(2–3), 273–282. doi:10.1016/S0034-4257(03)00184-6.
Graves, S., Yubin He M., & Hardin D. (2007). SERVIR at the age of four: The development of an environmental monitoring and visualization system for Mesoamerica. University of Maryland University College.
Grupo Regional Interagencial de Riesgo, Emergencia y Desastres de America Latina y el Caribe (REDLAC) (2008). Diez años después del huracán Mitch: panorama de la tendencia de la gestión del riesgo de desastre en Centroamérica.
Guha-Sapir, D., Below, R. & Hoyois, P. (2009). EM-DAT:International disaster database—www.emdat.be, http://www.emdat.be/advanced_search/index.html (Retrived from 2 November 2015)
Hansen, M. C., et al. (2013). High-resolution global maps of 21st-century forest cover change. Science, 342(6160), 850–853. doi:10.1126/science.1244693.
Harmeling, S. (2007). Global climate risk index 2008. Bonn, Berlin: Germanwatch.
INAB, CONAP, UVG, & URL (2012). Mapa de Cobertura Forestal de Guatemala 2010 y Dinámica de la Cobertura Forestal 2005–2010. Guatemala: INAB, CONAP, UVG, URL.
Jimenez, A. (2013). Metodología para el mapeo de tipos de bosques en el contexto de la cuantificación de la biomasa y el carbono forestal.
Mejía, S., Valerio, L., & Coronado, C. (2004). Aplication of low resolution satellite data for the detection and monitoring of fire in Nicaragua (pp. 413–417). Istanbul, Turkey: ISPRS.
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R. A., Mittermeier, C. G., da Fonseca, G. A. B., & Kent, J. (2000). Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature, 403(6772), 853–858. doi:10.1038/35002501.
Pierce, S. (2015). Unaccompanied Child Migrants in U.S. Communities, Immigration Court and Schools. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.
Ressl, R., Lopez, G., Cruz, I., Colditz, R. R., Schmidt, M., Ressl, S., & Jiménez, R. (2009). Operational active fire mapping and burnt area identification applicable to Mexican Nature Protection Areas using MODIS and NOAA-AVHRR direct readout data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 113(6), 1113–1126. doi:10.1016/j.rse.2008.10.016.
Rival, A., & Levang, P. (2015). The oil palm (Elaeis guineensis): Research challenges beyond controversies. Palms, 59(1), 33–49.
Rivera, S., Lowry, J. L., Sánchez, A. J. H., Ramsey, R. D., Lezama, R., & Velázquez, M. (2011). A MODIS generated land cover mapping of Honduras: a base-line layout to create a national monitoring center. Revista de teledetección: Revista de la Asociación Española de Teledetección, 35, 94–108.
Rocchio, L. E. P. (2014). Mapping disaster: A global community helps from space landsat science
Rodríguez, M., et al. (2013). Manglares de México: extensión, distribución y monitoreo. México: CONABIO.
Rose, R. A., et al. (2015). Ten ways remote sensing can contribute to conservation: Conservation remote sensing questions. Conservation Biology, 29(2), 350–359. doi:10.1111/cobi.12397.
Secades, C., O´Connor, B., Brown, C., & Walpole M. (2014). Earth observation for biodiversity monitoring: A review of current approaches and future opportunities for tracking progress towards the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Montréal, Canada: Technical Series, Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity.
Skidmore, A. K., et al. (2015). Environmental science: Agree on biodiversity metrics to track from space. Nature, 523(7561), 403–405. doi:10.1038/523403a.
Turner, W., et al. (2015). Free and open-access satellite data are key to biodiversity conservation. Biological Conservation, 182, 173–176. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2014.11.048.
UNEP-WCMC (2014). World database on protected areas (WDPA).
UNODC. (2013). Global study on homicide. Vienna, Austria: UNODC.
VAVILOV, N. I., & FREIER, F. (1951). Studies on the origin of cultivated plants.
Vreugdenhil, D., Meerman, J., Meyrat, A., Gomez, L. D., & Graham, D. (2002). Map of the ecosystems of Central America : Main report. Washington, DC.: World Bank.
Wang, J., Christopher, S. A., Nair, U. S., Reid, J. S., Prins, E. M., Szykman, J., & Hand, J. L.(2006). Mesoscale modeling of Central American smoke transport to the United States: 1. “Top-down” assessment of emission strength and diurnal variation impacts. Journal of Geophysical Research, 111(D5). doi:10.1029/2005JD006416.
World Bank. (2013). Shifting gears to accelerate shared prosperity in Latin America and the Caribbean. Washington, DC: World Bank.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramos, V.H., Flores, A.I. (2016). The Role of Earth Observation for Managing Biodiversity and Disasters in Mesoamerica: Past, Present, and Future. In: Hossain, F. (eds) Earth Science Satellite Applications. Springer Remote Sensing/Photogrammetry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33438-7_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33438-7_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33436-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33438-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)