Abstract
This chapter examines Ricœur’s reading of In Search of Lost Time by Marcel Proust, which is developed in the second volume of Time and Narrative. It insists first and foremost on the corporeality of involuntary memory. Highlighting both the strengths and weaknesses of Ricoeur’s interpretation, it argues that Ricoeur has not sufficiently emphasized the corporeal dimension of memory that is so crucial in Proustian descriptions, where it is primarily the body that remembers through the senses of taste, smell, touch, etc. Far from being secondary, the anchoring of memory in corporeality is essential to the sudden rediscovery of the time that was believed to be lost forever.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
Ricoeur (1986: 150) cites Proust (1981: 1089): “For they [my readers] will not, according to me, be my readers, but real readers of themselves, my book being nothing more than a sort of magnifying glass like those that the optician in Cambray holds out to a customer; my book, thanks to which I will provide them with the means to read themselves.”
- 2.
Note that Ricoeur always uses the term “visitation”, which has an evangelical and thus religious origin – it is about the visit of Maria, pregnant with Jesus, to Elizabeth, pregnant with John the Baptist and the recognition by Elizabeth of the Messiah in Mary’s belly! – to explain the scene in Guermantes’ library.
- 3.
These are the same examples Ricoeur uses in The Course of Recognition (2005), Study 2, section 1, “Ulysses makes himself known”.
- 4.
Allusion to Anne Simon’s title Proust ou le réel retrouvé (2000).
- 5.
Richard Kearney’s article has been published in Portuguese in Nascimento and Salles (2013). See also Kearney’s chapter in this book.
Bibliography
Benjamin, Walter. 1977. “Zum Bilde Prousts”. In Gesammelte Schriften, II-1. Frankfurt/Main: Suhrkamp.
Carbone, M., and E. Sparvedi (eds.). 2008. Proust et la philosophie aujourd’hui. Pisa: Edizioni ETS.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1964. Proust et les signes. Paris: PUF.
Deleuze, Gilles. 1972. Proust and signs. Transl. R. Howard. New York: George Brazilier.
Grondin, Jean. 2013. Paul Ricoeur. Paris: PUF.
Michel, Johann. 2015. Ricoeur and the Post-Structuralists. Trans. Scott Davidson. London: Rowman & Littlefield Intl.
Nascimento, F., and W. Salles (eds.). 2013. Paul Ricoeur. Ética, Identidade e Reconhecimento. São Paulo: Loyola Editions.
Proust, Marcel. 1981. Remembrance of things past. Transl. C.K. Scott-Montcrieff, T. Kilmartin & A. Mayor. New York: Random House.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1966. Freedom and nature: The voluntary and the involuntary. Transl. E. Kohak. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1969. The symbolism of evil. Transl. E. Buchanan. Boston: Beacon Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1986. Time and narrative II. Transl. K. McLaughlin and D. Pellauer. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ricoeur, Paul. 1995. Intellectual autobiography. In Library of living philosophers: Paul Ricoeur, ed. L.E. Hahn. Chicago: Open Court.
Ricoeur, Paul. 2005. The course of recognition. Transl. D. Pellauer. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Simon, Anne. 2000. Proust ou le réel retrouvé. Paris: PUF.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gagnebin, J.M. (2016). Involuntary Memory and Apprenticeship to Truth: Ricoeur Re-reads Proust. In: Davidson, S., Vallée, MA. (eds) Hermeneutics and Phenomenology in Paul Ricoeur. Contributions to Hermeneutics, vol 2. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33426-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33426-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33424-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33426-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)