Skip to main content

Justice

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Language, Hegemony and the European Union
  • 277 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter argues that there is a link between hegemony and the ethical, the normative being presented in ethical terms and unity being the consequence of justice. This frames our discussion of justice. This chapter is devoted to the relationship between justice and the changing moral order. It considers a range of different approaches and the relationship between justice and different dimensions of inequality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Benhabib (2002:197–198) persists with a similar argument. On the other hand no such argument is made with reference to global English segmenting state labour markets.

  2. 2.

    Touraine (1994:55) replaces individual inequality with the notion of social groups constantly in positions of inequality. Collective action does not aim to redress individual inequality but strives to direct attention to the injustice of inequality in the name of the dominated. All forms of social organisation are hierarchical, any appeal against the consequences of this hierarchy being a moral call for equality.

  3. 3.

    Essentially this is the same argument as that made by Anderson (1983) with reference to what he calls ‘imagined communities’.

  4. 4.

    Some argue that nomadisation, understood as the attempt to deny the link between identity and place in order to show that identities are constructed in and through hegemonic struggles, on the one hand, and hybridisation on the other, can undermine antagonism based on territoriality (Mouffe 1994).

  5. 5.

    There is a sense in which Habermas’ understanding of the individual as formed in and through intersubjectivity and interaction overlaps with Foucault’s notion of the constitution of the individual as subject. Of course they derive from quite different problematics.

  6. 6.

    The depth of involvement and the breadth of discussion on the issues associated with the referendum on Scotland’s independence is a case in point.

Bibliography

  • Anderson, B. 1983. Imagined communities: Reflections on the spread of nationalism. New York: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Archibugi, D. 2008. The global commonwealth of citizens: Towards cosmopolitan democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Balibar, E. 2004. We the people of Europe. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B. 1995. Justice as impartiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaud, O. 1996. Constitution et constitutionalisme. In Dictionaire de philosophie politique, ed. P. Raynaud and S. Rials, 117–126. Paris: PUF.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benhabib, S. 2002. The claims of culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Besnier, N. 1990. Language and affect. Annual review of anthropology 19, 419-451.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L. 1993. La Souffrance à distance. Paris: Metailie.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. 1978. Writing and Difference, U. Chicago: Chicago Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1977. The philosophy of law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1983. In defence of equality. Social Philosophy and Policy 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. 2003. Society must be defended: Lectures at the College de France 1975–1976. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. 1995. Recognition or redistribution? A critical reading of Iris Young’s justice and the politics of difference. Journal of Political Philosophy 3: 166–180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1991); Europe’s Second Chance. In J. Habermas, The Past as Future. Cambridge, Polity, 1994

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. 1996b. Between facts and norms: Contributions to a discourse theory of law and democracy. Cambridge: MIT University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2001. Why Europe needs a constitution. New Left Review 11.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2002. Three normative models of democracy. In Democracy and difference, ed. S. Benhabib, 21–31. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2005. Euroscepticisme, Europe du marche ou Europe (como) politique. In Une epoque des transitions, ecrits politque 1998–2003. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2012. The crisis of the European Union. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardt, M., and A. Negri. 2000. Empire. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hechter, M. 1975. Internal colonialism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. 1995. The struggle for recognition. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ives, P. 2015. Global English and the limits of liberalism. In Language policy and political economy, ed. T. Riciento, 48–71. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, M. ed. 1994; Critique and Power: recasting the Foucault-Habermas debate. MIT Press, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kymlicka, W. 1995. Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2007. Multicultural Odysses. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E. 2000a. Identity and hegemony. In Contingency, hegemony, universality, ed. J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Zizek, 44–89. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2000c. Constructing inequality. In Contingency, hegemony, universality, ed. J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Zizek, 281–307. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laclau, E., and C. Mouffe. 1985. Hegemony and socialist strategy. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Laitin, D. 2004. Language policy and Civil War. In Cultural diversity versus economic solidarity, ed. P. Van Parijs, 171–188. Brussels: De Boek.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. 1994. Political liberalism, neutrality and the political. Ratio Juris 7(3): 314–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2002. Politics and passions: The stakes of democracy. London: Centre for the Study of Democracy.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2009. Wittgenstein, political theory and democracy. Polylog.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muehelbach, A. 2012. The Moral Neoliberal. U. Chicago press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nozick, R. 1974. Anarchy, state and utopia. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rao, R. 2010. Third world protest: Between home and the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1977. A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1985. Justice as fairness: Political and metaphysical. Philosophy and Public Affairs 14(3): 225–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1993. Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rorty, R. 1989. Contingency, irony, and solidarity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Rosanvallon, P. 2008. La légitimité démocratique. Impartialité, réflexivité, proximité, Seuil, Paris 2008

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1991. Wittgenstein, Heidegger, and the reification of language. In Essays on Heidegger and others. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1996. Objectivity, relativism and truth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidentop, L. (2000). Democracy in Europe. London, Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1976. A theory of moral sentiments. Indianapolis: Liberty Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stiglitz, J. 2010. Moral Bankruptcy. Mother Jones, January/February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, C. 1989. Sources of the self. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1992. Multiculturalism and the politics of recognition. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1995. Philosophical arguments. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torfing, J. 1999. New theories of discourse. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Touraine, A. 1994. Qu’est-de que la democratie. Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1997. Pourrons-Nous Vivre Ensemble? Paris: Fayard.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2010. Apres le Crise. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Parijs, P. 2011. Linguistic justice for Europe and for the world. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M. 1987. Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzer, M., and D. Miller. 1995. Pluralism, justice and equality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wievrioka, M. 2008. Neuf leçons de sociologie. Paris: Laffont.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, G. 1987. Bilingualism, class dialect and social reproduction. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 66: 85–99.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1999. French discourse analysis: The method of poststructuralism. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. 1958. Philosophical investigation. New York: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, I.M. 1996. Communication and the other: Beyond deliberative Democracy. In Democracy and difference, ed. S. Benhabib, 120–137. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Žižek, S. 2000. Holding the place. In Contingency, hegemony, universality, ed. J. Butler, E. Laclau, and S. Zizek, 308–329. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Williams, G., Williams, G. (2016). Justice. In: Language, Hegemony and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33416-5_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33416-5_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33415-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33416-5

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics