Skip to main content

Education for Ethical Leadership: Social Responsibility and Public Deliberation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Business Ethics Education and the Pragmatic Pursuit of the Good

Part of the book series: Advances in Business Ethics Research ((ABER,volume 6))

  • 434 Accesses

Abstract

The pragmatic pursuit of the good in business operations and outcomes entails a social responsibility to serve the general welfare as a matter of justice. Reflections on matters of justice currently occur in legislative and judicial forums, but government and law are not adequate to address and resolve the many considerations of justice involving business activities. In order to meet their social responsibilities, business leaders must be prepared to engage in public ethical reflection that distinguishes public accountability on matters of justice from personal moral accountability to one’s conscience, and be prepared as well to convene and lead public deliberations to determine the legitimacy, priority, and just resolution of social claims. Drawing upon the extensive experience and literature of deliberative democracy, these deliberations can take a variety of forms and function at different scales, depending on the parties and concerns involved. In all cases, deliberations must proceed under the standards of public reason and be informed by objective evidence and reasonable argument. An important component of these deliberations is therefore a process of social analysis that can uncover personal and organizational biases and capabilities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Public justice is my term for these duties, as a shorthand way to refer to this particular area of responsibility and accountability.

References

  • Ackert, L.F., B.K. Church, X(J). Kuang, and L. Qi. 2011. Lying: An experimental investigation of the role of situational factors. Business Ethics Quarterly 21(4): 605–632.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1962. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. M. Ostwald. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall (Original published c. 330 BCE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J.D. 2000. A framework for discussing normative theories of business ethics. Business Ethics Quarterly 10(3): 563–591.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J.R. 1994. Fiduciary duties and the shareholder-management relation: Or, what’s so special about shareholders? Business Ethics Quarterly 4(4): 393–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boatright, J.R. 2012. Ethics and the conduct of business, 7th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Education, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, P.C. 2000. Social entrepreneurship: The art of mission-based venture development. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brinckerhoff, P.C. 2009. Mission-based management: Leading your not-for-profit in the 21st century, 3rd ed. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchholz, R.A. 2009. Rethinking capitalism: Community and responsibility in business. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Comer, D.R., and G. Vega. 2011. Introduction: Why moral courage matters in organizations. In Moral courage in organizations: Doing the right thing at work, ed. D.R. Comer and G. Vega, xv–xxii. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • Corning, P. 2011. The fair society: The science of human nature and the pursuit of social justice. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • DesJardins, J. 2009. An introduction to business ethics, 3rd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., and T.W. Dunfee. 1994. Toward a unified conception of business ethics: Integrative social contracts theory. The Academy of Management Review 19(2): 252–284.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, T., and T.W. Dunfee. 1995. Integrative social contracts theory: A communitarian conception of economic ethics. Economics and Philosophy 11: 85–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 1997. The architectonic of the ethics of liberation. Philosophy and Social Criticism 23(3): 1–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dussel, E. 1999. Six theses toward a critique of political reason: The citizen as political agent. Trans. C. Lloyd and E. Mendieta. Radical Philosophy Review 2(2): 79–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dworkin, R. 1986. Law’s empire. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fishkin, J.S., and R.C. Luskin. 2005. Experimenting with a democratic ideal: Deliberative polling and public opinion. Acta Politica 40: 284–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R.E., J.S. Harrison, A.C. Wicks, B.L. Parmar, and S. De Colle. 2010. Stakeholder theory: The state of the art. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gentile, M.C. 2010. Giving voice to values: A brief introduction. Available from Babson College at http://www.babson.edu/faculty/teaching-learning/gvv/Documents/Student/GVV-Brief-Introduction_S.pdf.

  • Gentile, M.C. 2011. Giving voice to values: Building moral competence. In Moral courage in organizations: Doing the right thing at work, ed. D.R. Comer and G. Vega, 117–129. Armonk: M. E. Sharpe.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, B. 2007. True north: Discover your authentic leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gregory, R. 1995. Accountability, responsibility and corruption: Managing the “public production process.”. In The state under contract, ed. J. Boston, 56–77. Wellington: Bridget Williams Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guy, M.E., and S.A. McCandless. 2012. Social equity: Its legacy, its promise. Public Administration Review 72(1): S5–S13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haight, C. 2011. The problem with Fair Trade Coffee. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Summer. http://www.ssireview.org/articles/entry/2534.

  • Hampshire, S. 2000. Justice is conflict. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holland, J., and P. Henriot. 1983. Social analysis. Maryknoll: Orbis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Josephson, M. 2006. The six pillars of character. In The ethics edge, 2nd ed, ed. J.P. West and E.M. Berman, 11–17. Washington, DC: ICMA Press (Original work published 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kahane, D., K. Loptson, J. Herriman, and M. Hardy. 2013. Stakeholder and citizen roles in public deliberation. Journal of Public Deliberation 9(2), Article 2. Available at: http://www.publicdeliberation.net/jpd/vol9/iss2/art2.

  • Kalscheur, G.A. 2004. American Catholics and the state. America 191(3): 15–18, August 2–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kania, J., and M. Kramer. 2011. Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, Winter, pp. 36–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kant, I. 1956. Groundwork of the Metaphysic of Morals. Trans. H.J. Paton. New York: Harper & Row (Original published 1785).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaveny, M.C. 2000. Law, morality, and common ground. America 183(19): 7–10, December 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettering Foundation. 1996. Twelve major findings from studies of public deliberation. Unpublished manuscript, Kettering Foundation, Dayton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kilpatrick, W. 1992. Why Johnny can’t tell right from wrong. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohlberg, L. 1980. Stages of moral development as a basis for moral education. In Moral development, moral education, and Kohlberg, ed. B. Munsey, 1–98. Birmingham: Religious Education Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lager, J.M. 2009. Have a problem with compliance? Public Administration Times, October, p. 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lickona, T. 1991. Educating for character: How our schools can teach respect and responsibility. New York: Bantam Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Light, P.C. 2008. The search for social entrepreneurship. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohmann, R.A. 1992. The commons. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukensmeyer, C.J., and L.H. Torres. 2006. Public deliberation: A manager’s guide to citizen engagement. Retrieved July 22, 2015 from the IBM Center for the Business of Government at http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/LukensmeyerReport.pdf.

  • Mackey, J. 2007. Conscious capitalism: Creating a new paradigm for business. Retrieved April 20, 2011 at http://www.flowidealism.org/2007/Downloads/Conscious-Capitalism_JM.pdf.

  • Maritain, J. (1966). The person and the common good. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press (Original published 1946).

    Google Scholar 

  • Millon, D. 1990. Theories of the corporation. Duke Law Journal 39:2 201–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naroll, R. 1983. The moral order: An introduction to the human situation. Beverley Hills/London/New Delhi: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Coalition for Dialogue & Deliberation. 2010. Resource Guide on Public Engagement. Retrieved July 23, 2015 at http://www.ncdd.org/files/NCDD2010_Resource_Guide.pdf.

  • Nussbaum, M.C. 2011. Creating capabilities: The human development approach. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Padfield, S. 2012. The silent role of corporate theory in the Supreme Court’s campaign finance cases, University of Pennsylvania Journal of Constitutional Law (forthcoming draft, electronic copy available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=2025159).

  • Porter, M. 1979. How competitive forces shape strategy. Harvard Business Review, March–April, pp. 1–10.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M.E., and M.R. Kramer. 2011. Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review 89(1/2): 62–77, January–February.

    Google Scholar 

  • Powers, R., S. Williams, R. Daugherty, and W. Pettersen. 2002. Public deliberation: Does it work? University Outreach and Extension, University of Missouri System and Cooperative Extension Service, Oklahoma State University. Available at: http://extension.missouri.edu/cd/pubdelib/CPPEForumParticipantpaperfinal65021.pdf, June.

  • Rawls, J. 1971. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1996. Political liberalism, Rev ed. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. 1997. The idea of public reason revisited. University of Chicago Law Review, Summer, pp. 765–807.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rest, J.R. 1994. Background: Theory and research. In Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics, ed. J.R. Rest and D. Narváez, 1–26. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roemer, J.E. 1996. Theories of distributive justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, K. 1996. Character education in the United States. Journal for a Just and Caring Education 2(1): 75–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saddler-Smith, E. 2012. Before virtue: Biology, brain, behavior, and the “moral sense”. Business Ethics Quarterly 22(2): 351–376. doi:10.5840/beq201222223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schultz, W.J. 2001. The moral conditions of economic efficiency. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, F.J. 2007. The priority of justice: A framework approach to ethics in program evaluation. Evaluation and Program Planning 30: 294–399.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweigert, F.J. 2016. Social responsibility as a matter of justice: A proposal to expand business ethics education. In Understanding ethics and responsibilities in a globalizing world, ed. M.C. Coutinho de Arruda and B. Rok, 229–246. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 2009. The idea of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro, S.J. 2011. Legality. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silver-Greenberg, J., and B. Protess. 2013. Senate inquiry faults JPMorgan on trading loss. The New York Times, March 15, pp. A1, A3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snyder, K. 2006. Putting democracy front & center: Technology for citizen participation. Planning (American Planning Association), July, pp. 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Svara, J. 2007. The ethics primer for public administrators in government and nonprofit organizations. Sudbury: Jones and Bartlett Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trevino, L.K., and K.A. Nelson. 2007. Managing business ethics: Straight talk about how to do it right, 4th ed. Hoboken: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. 1948. Universal declaration of human rights. Available from the United Nations at http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/.

  • Weissbourd, R. 2003. Moral teachers, moral students. Educational Leadership 60(6): 6–11, March.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wettstein, F. 2009. Multinational corporations and global justice. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • What Is the Social License? 2014. Retrieved July 23, 2015 from On Common Ground Consultants Inc. & Robert Boutilier and Associates at http://socialicense.com/definition.html.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schweigert, F.J. (2016). Education for Ethical Leadership: Social Responsibility and Public Deliberation. In: Business Ethics Education and the Pragmatic Pursuit of the Good. Advances in Business Ethics Research, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33402-8_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics