Skip to main content

Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 503 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems ((LNE,volume 684))

Abstract

This outlines the book’s content: it is a new formal framework for the theory of perfectly competitive equilibrium and its industrial applications. Based in good part on ideas of Boiteux and Koopmans, the “short-run approach” is a scheme for calculating long-run producer optimum and market equilibrium by building on short-run solutions to the producer’s profit maximization problem, in which capital inputs and natural resources are treated as fixed. These inputs are valued at their marginal contributions to the operating profit. Since short-run profit is a concave but generally nondifferentiable function of the fixed inputs, their marginal values are defined as the generally nonunique supergradient vectors. Also, they usually have to be obtained as solutions to the dual programme of fixed-input valuation. The key property of the dual solution is therefore its marginal interpretation, but this requires the use of a generalized, multi-valued derivative of a convex function—the subdifferential—because an optimal-value functions are commonly nondifferentiable. Applied to the peak-load pricing of electricity generated by thermal, hydro and pumped-storage plants, the approach gives a sound and practical method of valuing the fixed assets (the river flows and the geological sites suitable for reservoirs).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    When carried out by iterations, the calculations might also be seen as modelling the real processes of price and quantity adjustments.

  2. 2.

    The theory of differentiable convex functions is, of course, included in subdifferential calculus as a special case. Furthermore, the subgradient concept can also be used to prove, rather than assume, that a convex function is differentiable—by showing that it has a unique subgradient. This method is used in [21, 23], [27, Section 9] and [30, Section 9].

  3. 3.

    From Sect. 3.2 on, short-run cost minimization is split off as a subprogramme, whose solution is denoted by \(\check{v}\left (y,k,w\right )\). In these terms, \(\hat{v}\left (\,p,k,w\right ) =\check{ v}\left (\hat{y}\left (\,p,k,w\right ),k,w\right )\).

  4. 4.

    A short-run approach to equilibrium might also be based on short-run cost minimization, in which not only the capital inputs (k) but also the outputs (y) are kept fixed and are shadow-priced in the dual problem, but such cost-based calculations are usually much more complicated than those using profit maximization: see Sect. 4.1

  5. 5.

    Boiteux’s work is also presented by Drèze [15, pp. 10–16], but the short-run character of the approach is more evident from the original [9, 3.2–3.3] because Boiteux discusses the short-run equilibrium first, before using it as part of the long-run equilibrium system. When Drèze mentions short-run equilibrium on its own, it is only as an afterthought [15, p. 16].

  6. 6.

    This is not an unacceptable condition, but some capacities can of course be zero in long-run equilibrium. The long-run model meets the usual adequacy assumption, as does the short-run model with positive capacities, and so existence of an equilibrium follows from Bewley’s result [7, Theorem 1], which is amplified in [31, Section 3] and [29] by a proof based on continuity of demand in prices.

  7. 7.

    As is well known, this process does not always converge, but there are other iterative methods.

  8. 8.

    In general, this is an inclusion rather than an equality: see (4.2.19).

  9. 9.

    By contrast, SRC minimization for a system of plants can be difficult because it involves allocating the system’s given output among the plants. Its complexity shows in, e.g., the case of a hydro-thermal electricity-generating system studied by Koopmans [35]. The decentralized approach taken here (Chaps. 4 and 5 with their references) avoids having to deal directly with the formidable problem of minimizing the entire system’s cost: see the Comments with Formulae (4.1.3) and (4.1.4).

  10. 10.

    This shows how mistaken is the widespread but unexamined view that nondifferentiabilities of convex functions are of little consequence: the very points which, in a sense, are exceptional a priori turn out to be the rule rather than the exception in equilibrium. Also, it is only on finite-dimensional spaces that convex functions are “generically smooth” or, more precisely, twice differentiable almost everywhere with respect to the Lebesgue measure (Alexandroff’s Theorem). On an infinite-dimensional space, a convex function can be nondifferentiable everywhere.

  11. 11.

    Capital inputs are called independent if the SRP function (\(\Pi _{\mathrm{SR}}\)) is linear in the capital-input bundle \(k = \left (k_{1},k_{2},\ldots \right )\); an example is the multi-station technology of thermal electricity generation. Such a technology in effect separates into a number of production techniques with a single capital input each, and so Boiteux’s analysis applies readily: to ensure that a short-run equilibrium is a long-run equilibrium, it suffices to require cost recovery for each production technique θ with k θ  > 0, although one must also remember to check that any unutilized production technique (one with k θ  = 0) is unprofitable at the equilibrium prices (e.g., that \(r_{\theta } \geq \int \left (\,p\left (t\right ) - w_{\theta }\right )\mathrm{d}t\) for any unbuilt type θ of thermal station, with unit capital cost r θ and unit fuel cost w θ ).

  12. 12.

    To distinguish the two quite different meanings of the word “Lagrangian”, it shall be occasionally expanded into either “Lagrange function” (in the multiplier method of optimization) or “Lagrange integrand” (in the calculus of variations only).

  13. 13.

    Without involving \(\Pi _{\mathrm{SR}}\), the inclusion ( y C LR ⊆  y C SR) can be improved only by making it more precise but no more useful: \(\partial _{y}C_{\mathrm{SR}}\left (y,k\right )\) can be shown to equal the union of \(\partial _{y}C_{\mathrm{LR}}\left (y,r\right )\) over \(r \in -\partial _{k}C_{\mathrm{SR}}\left (y,k\right )\), i.e., over all those fixed-input price systems r for which k is an optimal fixed-input bundle for the output bundle y (given also the suppressed variable-input price system w): see (3.9.11).

  14. 14.

    For a count of variables and constraints, see the last Comment in Sect. 3.12 before Formula (3.12.15).

  15. 15.

    See [21] and [23] for examples of an SRP programme in which the output space is \(L^{\infty }\left [0,T\right ]\) and a “singular” price term places the price system outside the predual \(L^{1}\left [0,T\right ]\), but it is the timing of the singularity, and not just its presence, that determines whether the programme is soluble or not.

References

  1. Afriat SN (1971) Theory of maxima and the method of Lagrange. SIAM J Appl Math 20:343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aubin JP, Ekeland I (1984) Applied nonlinear analysis. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bewley T (1972) Existence of equilibria in economies with infinitely many commodities. J Econ Theory 4:514–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Boiteux M (1964) Peak-load pricing. In: Nelson JR (ed) Marginal cost pricing in practice (Chapter 4). Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs ((1949) A translation of “La tarification des demandes en pointe: application de la théorie de la vente au coût marginal”, Revue Général de l’Electricité 58:321–340)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Diewert WE (1982) Duality approaches to microeconomic theory. In: Arrow KJ, Intriligator MD (eds) Handbook of mathematical economics, vol II (Chapter 12). North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drèze JH (1964) Some postwar contributions of French economists to theory and public policy. Am Econ Rev 54(supplement):1–64

    Google Scholar 

  7. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (1996) Efficiency rents of storage plants in peak-load pricing, I: pumped storage. STICERD Discussion Paper TE/96/301, LSE (This is a fuller version of Ref. [27])

    Google Scholar 

  8. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (1999) Efficiency rents of storage plants in peak-load pricing, II: hydroelectricity. STICERD Discussion Paper TE/99/372, LSE (This is a fuller version of Refs. [24] and [30])

    Google Scholar 

  9. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (1999) Efficiency rents of hydroelectric storage plants in continuous-time peak-load pricing. In: Dahiya SB (ed) The current state of economic science, vol 1. Spellbound Publications, Rohtak, pp 453–480

    Google Scholar 

  10. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (2002) Boiteux’s solution to the shifting-peak problem and the equilibrium price density in continuous time. Econ Theory 20:503–537. DOI:10.1007/s001990100226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (2002) Efficiency rents of pumped-storage plants and their uses for operation and investment decisions. J Econ Dyn Control 27:109–142. DOI: 10.1016/S0165-1889(01)00030-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (2006) Demand continuity and equilibrium in Banach commodity spaces. In: Wieczorek A, Malawski M, Wiszniewska-Matyszkiel A (eds) Game theory and mathematical economics, vol 71. Banach Center Publications, pp 163–183. (Also available as CDAM Research Report LSE-CDAM-2005-01, http://www.cdam.lse.ac.uk/Reports/reports2005.html)

  13. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ (2007) Profit-maximizing operation and valuation of hydroelectric plant: a new solution to the Koopmans problem. J Econ Dyn Control 31:938–970. DOI: 10.1016/j.jedc.2006.03.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Horsley A, Wrobel AJ, Van Zandt T (1998) Berge’s Maximum Theorem with two topologies on the action set. Econ Lett 61:285–291. DOI:10.1016/S0165-1765(98)00177-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Koopmans TC (1957) Water storage policy in a simplified hydroelectric system. In: Proceedings of the First international conference on operational research, pp 193–227. Operations Research Society of America, Baltimore (Also in: Koopmans TC (1970) Scientific papers of Tjalling C. Koopmans. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp 282–316)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rockafellar RT (1968) A general correspondence between dual minimax problems and convex programs. Pac J Math 25:597–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rockafellar RT (1970) Conjugate convex functions in optimal control and the calculus of variations. J Math Anal Appl 32:174–222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rockafellar RT (1974) Conjugate duality and optimization. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Rockafellar RT, Wets RJB (1997) Variational analysis. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg-New York

    Google Scholar 

  20. Takayama A (1985) Mathematical economics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge-London-New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Horsley, A., Wrobel, A.J. (2016). Introduction. In: The Short-Run Approach to Long-Run Equilibrium in Competitive Markets. Lecture Notes in Economics and Mathematical Systems, vol 684. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33398-4_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics