Skip to main content

Model Explanations of a Nuclear Powered South Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to the analysis and constructs of nuclear proliferation in South Africa. The analysis highlights the rationale for nuclear proliferation. It provides model explanations for South Africa’s nuclear weapons development and determines the nature of the political environment that conditioned decisions and outcomes. This chapter seeks to determine whether or not certain patterns of similarity or difference exist among the nations and to identify the significant factors influencing a nation’s nuclear options. Based on this comparison, this chapter also provides an overall evaluation of nuclear weapons programs in the case study countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By 1981, South Africa had formal diplomatic relations with only 15 states.

  2. 2.

    The term “laager” means a defensive formation of wagons and comes from the Afrikaners’ treks into South Africa. It is used to describe a defensive attitude towards the world.

  3. 3.

    Some suggest that US intervention in the 1973 Yom Kippur war on Israel’s side encouraged South Africans to believe in catalytic deterrence.

  4. 4.

    Interestingly, Pik Botha, the South African Prime Minister, described the nuclear weapon as a diplomatic weapon to defend South Africa. Other possible uses of the weapon listed by Betts were dissuading neighboring African states from harboring insurgents and compelling them to engage in greater economic and diplomatic interaction with South Africa, thus reducing its isolation. These seem even more implausible.

  5. 5.

    Angola, Botswana, Lesotho, Mozambique, Namibia, Swaziland, and Zimbabwe have borders with South Africa. These “frontline states” were accused of providing shelter to antiapartheid fighters and to Communists.

  6. 6.

    But failed to mention Britain as a collaborator in its advancement in nuclear strategy and capability.

  7. 7.

    South African engineers had extensive experience with deep-level mining, so it is unclear why they would make the preparations above ground, permitting detection by satellites. It is also suggested that the country had not produced enough HEU for a test in 1977.

  8. 8.

    “Rogue states” is a term usually attributed to states other than the five recognized nuclear states (the USA, Soviet Union, Britain, France, and China) that chose to build nuclear weapons against the dictates of international treaties banning such. In the 1990s, Iraq was regarded as one. South Africa was fairly quietly regarded as rogue state in the 1980s.

References

  • Albright, D., & Hibbs, M. (1993). South Africa: The ANC and the atom bomb. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 49(3), 32–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asuelime, L. (2012). Perche il Sudafrica si e Fatto la Bomba (E Pol L’ha Smantellata) (pp. 237–244). Limes: Rivista Italiana di Geopolitica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Asuelime, L. (2013). Drivers of nuclear proliferation in the global south: A historical analysis of South Africa. A PhD thesis international relations, submitted to the College of Humanities, University of KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa (Unpublished).

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R. (1977). Paranoids, pygmies, pariahs and nonproliferation. Foreign Policy, No. 26 (Spring), 162–164.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betts, R. (1979). A diplomatic bomb for South Africa? International Security, 4(2), 91–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Villiers, J. W., Jardine, R., & Reiss, M. (1993). Why South Africa gave up the bomb. Foreign Affairs, 72(6), 98–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department of Foreign Affairs. (2001, April 7). Statement regarding the visit of the Director-General of the IAEA. Department of Foreign Affairs, South Africa. http://www.info.gov.za/speeches/2001/010409945a1001.htm. Accessed 11 Jan 2006.

  • Dunn, L. A. (1991). Containing nuclear proliferation. Adelphi Paper, No. 263, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fig, D. (1999). Sanctions and the nuclear industry. In N. Crawford & A. Klotz (Eds.), How sanctions work. New York: St. Martin’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, D. (1993). Reversing nuclear proliferation: South Africa. Security Dialogue, 24(3), 273–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forge, J., & Myhra, S. (1995). The utility of ambiguity: Towards a theory of horizontal proliferation in the ‘New World Order’. Canberra: Peace Research Centre, Australian National University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frankel, B. (1993). The brooding shadow: Systemic incentives and nuclear weapons proliferation. In Z. Davis & B. Frankel (Eds.), The proliferation puzzle: Why nuclear weapons spread. Portland, OR: Frank Cass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garrity, P. J. (1980). South African strategy: The strategy of an international pariah. Naval War College Review, 33, 23–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkavy, R. E. (1981). Pariah states and nuclear proliferation. International Organization, 35(1), 135–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hibbs, M. (1993). South Africa’s secret nuclear program: The dismantling. Nuclear Fuel, 18(11), 9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howlett, D., & Simpson, J. (1993). Nuclearization and denuclearization in South Africa. Survival, 35(3), 154–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klotz, A. (1995). Norms in international relations: The struggle against apartheid. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liberman, P. (2001). The rise and fall of the South African bomb. International Security, 26, No. 2 (Fall), 45–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Masiza, Z., & Landsberg, C. (1996). Fission for compliments? South Africa and the 1995 extension of the nuclear nonproliferation treaty. Johannesburg: Centre for Policy Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Minty, A. S. (1994). South Africa’s military and nuclear build-up. In E. S. Reddy (Ed.), Anti-apartheid movement and the United Nations: Statements, papers and letters of Abdul S. Minty. New Delhi: Sanchar Publishing House.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Security Archive. (1985, April 17). Memo from Chester Crocker, Assistant Secretary of State, to the Joint Committee on Foreign Affairs—Item SA01795.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Security Archive. (1987, July 29). Nuclear news from South Africa—Item SA02378. Secret Cable 11288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pabian, F. (1995). South Africa’s nuclear weapons programme: Lessons for US nonproliferation policy. Nonproliferation Review, 3, 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik, A. V. (1993). South Africa’s nuclear bomb: A Western responsibility. Strategic Analysis, 26(3), 297–310.

    Google Scholar 

  • Purkitt, H. E., & Burgess, S. F. (2005). South Africa’s weapons of mass destruction. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajamohan, C. (1980). Atomic teeth to apartheid: South Africa and nuclear weapons. IDSA Journal, 12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M. (1995). Bridled ambition: Why countries constrain their nuclear capabilities. Washington, DC: Woodrow Wilson Center Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheinman, L. (1987). The IAEA and world nuclear order. Washington, DC: Resources for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, W. (1996). South Africa’s nuclear weapons program: From deterrence to dismantlement. Arms Control Today, 25(10), 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thayer, B. A. (1998). The causes of nuclear proliferation and the utility of the nonproliferation regime. In R. G. C. Thomas (Ed.), The nuclear nonproliferation regime. Houndmills: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walters, R. W. (1987). South Africa and the bomb: Responsibility and deterrence. Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Asuelime, L.E., Adekoye, R.A. (2016). Model Explanations of a Nuclear Powered South Africa. In: Nuclear Proliferation in South Africa. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33373-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics