Skip to main content

Disputes About General Facts and Theories

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Beg to Differ
  • 215 Accesses

Abstract

Debates on answers to factual questions invite considering first what answer reduces the strangeness of the world, and perhaps also to what degree. Check which answer is simpler; of two theories that explain the same items, the simpler is usually preferred. Check also whether the theory under dispute successfully predicts previously unknown surprising facts or rather just explains known facts (the latter is much the easier one). Avoid debates with people who repeatedly change the wording of their assertions in response to refutations by applying ad hoc corrections to them, especially those who pretend that these corrections are mere clarifications. In general, adversaries who admit error frankly are preferable; more so those who admit error with no fuss.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 19.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 29.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Agassi, J., Meidan, A. (2016). Disputes About General Facts and Theories. In: Beg to Differ. Copernicus, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33307-6_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics