Skip to main content

In Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis Does Clot Removal Improve Functional Outcome When Compared to Traditional Anticoagulation?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Difficult Decisions in Vascular Surgery

Abstract

Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis is a common clinical condition which often results in post-thrombotic syndrome, a cause of long-term morbidity due to diminished function. The mainstays of treatment for deep vein thrombosis include anticoagulation and compression therapy but these only prevent propagation of the venous clot. Therapeutic options which actively remove clot decrease the risk of post-thrombotic syndrome when compared to conventional anticoagulation alone, an effect attributed to alleviated obstruction and decreased damage to venous valves. Removal of venous clot with catheter-directed thrombolysis is a safe, effective treatment option which can improve functional outcomes in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. In patients with contraindication to thrombolytic therapy, surgical thrombectomy is an alternative which also improves functional outcomes in iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 229.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Browse NL, Burnand KG, Lea Thomas M. Deep vein thrombosis: pathology, diagnosis, and treatment. In: Browse NL, Burnand KG, Irvine AT, editors. Disease of the veins. 2nd ed. London: Edward Arnold; 1999. p. 443–74.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Mohr DN, Silverstein MD, Heit JA, et al. The venous stasis syndrome after deep venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism: a population-based study. Mayo Clin Proc. 2000;75:1249–56.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Brandjes DP, Buller HR, Heijboer H, et al. Randomised trial of effect of compression stockings in patients with symptomatic proximal-vein thrombosis. Lancet. 1997;349:759–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Saarinen J, Kallio T, Lehto M, et al. The occurence of the post-thrombotic changes after an acute deep venous thrombosis. A prospective two-year follow-up study. J Cardiovasc Surg. 2000;41:441–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Cogo A, et al. The long-term clinical course of acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 1996;125:1–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kahn SR, Shrier I, Julian JA, et al. Determinants and time course of the postthrombotic syndrome after acute deep venous thrombosis. Ann Intern Med. 2008;149:698–707.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Bergqvist D, Jendteg S, Johansen L, et al. Cost of long-term complications of deep venous thrombosis of the lower extremities: an analysis of a defined patient population in Sweden. Ann Intern Med. 1997;126:454–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Smith JJ, Guest MG, Greenhalgh RM, et al. Measuring the quality of life in patients with venous ulcers. J Vasc Surg. 2000;31:642–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Ruckley CV. Socioeconomic impact of chronic venous insufficiency and leg ulcers. Angiology. 1997;48:67–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Suwanabol PA, Hoch JR. Venous thromboembolic disease. Surg Clin North Am. 2013;93:983–95.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Kearon C, Kahn SR, Agnelli G, et al. Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition). Chest. 2008;133:454S–545.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Prandoni P, Lensing AW, Prins MH, et al. Below-knee elastic compression stockings to prevent the post-thrombotic syndrome. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:249–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kahn SR, Shapiro S, Wells PS, et al. Compression stockings to prevent post-thrombotic syndrome: a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383:880–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Comerota AJ, Gale SS. Technique of contemporary iliofemoral and infrainguinal venous thrombectomy. J Vasc Surg. 2006;43:185–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Mewissen MW. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep vein thrombosis. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2001;4:111–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Soosainathan A, Moore HM, Gohel MS, et al. Scoring systems for the post-thrombotic syndrome. J Vasc Surg. 2013;57:254–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Okrent D, Messersmidt R, Buckman J. Transcatheter fibrinolytic therapy and angioplasty for left iliofemoral venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1991;1:195–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bjarnason H, Kruse JR, Asinger DA, et al. Iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis: safety and efficacy outcome during 5 years of catheter-directed thrombolytic therapy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1997;8:405–18.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Patel NH, Stookey KR, Ketcham DB, et al. Endovascular management of acute extensive iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis caused by May-Thurner syndrome. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2000;11:1297–302.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shortell CK, Queiroz R, Johansson M, et al. Safety and efficacy of limited-dose tissue plasminogen activator in acute vascular occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2001;34:854–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sugimoto K, Hofmann LV, Razavi MK, et al. The safety, efficacy, and pharmacoeconomics of low-dose alteplase compared with urokinase for catheter-directed thrombolysis of arterial and venous occlusion. J Vasc Surg. 2003;37:512–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Grunwald MR, Hofmann LV. Comparison of urokinase, alteplase, and reteplase for catheter-directed thombolysis of deep venous thrombosis. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2004;15:347–52.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Mewissen MW, Seabrook GR, Meissner MH, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for lower extremity deep venous thrombosis: report of a national multicenter registry. Radiology. 1999;211:39–49.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kim HS, Preece SR, Black JH, et al. Safety of catheter-directed thrombolysis for deep venous thrombosis in cancer patients. J Vasc Surg. 2008;47:388–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Herrera S, Comerota AJ, Thakur S, et al. Managing iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis of pregnancy with a strategy of thrombus removal is safe and avoids post-thrombotic morbidity. J Vasc Surg. 2014;59:456–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Garg K, Cayne N, Jacobowitz G. Mechanical and pharmacologic catheter-directed thrombolysis treatment of severe, symptomatic, bilateral deep vein thrombosis with congenital absence of the inferior vena cava. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:1707–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Sloot S, Nierop JV, Kootstra J, et al. Bilateral catheter-directed thombolysis in a patient with deep venous thrombosis caused by a hypoplastic inferior vena cava. Phlebology. 2015;30:293–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Meissner MH, Gloviczki P, Comerota AJ, et al. Early thrombus removal strategies for acute deep venous thrombosis: Clinical Practice Guidelines of the Society for Vascular Surgery and the American Venous Forum. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1449–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Vedantham S, Thorpe PE, Cardella JF, et al. Quality improvement guidelines for the treatment of lower extremity deep vein thrombosis with use of endovascular thrombus removal. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20:S227–39.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Schweizer J, Kirch W, Koch R, et al. Short- and long-term results after thrombolytic treatment of deep venous thrombosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:1336–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Dasari TW, Pappy RM, Hennebry TA. Pharmacomechanical thrombolysis of acute and chronic symptomatic deep vein thrombosis: a systematic review of literature. Angiology. 2012;63:138–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim HS, Patra A, Paxton BE, et al. Adjunctive percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy for lower-extremity deep vein thrombosis: clinical and economic outcomes. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2006;17:1099–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin PH, Zhou W, Dardik A, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis versus pharmacomechanical thrombectomy for treatment of symptomatic lower extremity deep venous thrombosis. Am J Surg. 2006;192:782–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Casey ET, Murad MH, Zumaeta M, et al. Treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:1463–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Watson L, Broderick C, Armon MP. Thrombolysis for acute deep vein thrombosis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(1):CD002783.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Comerota AJ, Throm RC, Mathias SD, et al. Catheter-directed thrombolysis for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis improves health-related quality of life. J Vasc Surg. 2000;32:130–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. AbuRahma AF, Perkins SE, Wulu JT, et al. Iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis: conventional therapy versus lysis and percutaneous transluminal angioplasty and stenting. Ann Surg. 2001;233:752–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Comerota AJ. Quality-of-life improvement using thrombolytic therapy for iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis. Rev Cardiovasc Med. 2002;3:S61–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Elsharawy M, Elzayat E. Early results of thrombolysis vs anticoagulation in iliofemoral venous thrombosis. A randomised clinical trial. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2002;24:209–14.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Markevicius N, Apanavicius G, Scerbinskas S. Comparison between long-term results of catheter-directed thrombolysis and anticoagulation in the treatment of acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis. Phlebology. 2004;19:148–9.

    Google Scholar 

  41. Enden T, Haig Y, Klow NE, et al. Long-term outcome after additional catheter-directed thrombolysis versus standard treatment for acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis (the CaVenT study): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2012;379:31–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Enden T, Wik HS, Kvam AK, et al. Health-related quality of life after catheter-directed thombolysis for deep vein thrombosis: secondary outcomes of the randomised, non-blinded, parallel-group CaVenT study. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e002984.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Baekgaard N. Benefit of catheter-directed thrombolysis for acute iliofemoral DVT: myth or reality? Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2014;48:361–2.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Vedantham S, Goldhaber SZ, Kahn ST, et al. Rationale and design of the ATTRACT study – a multicenter randomized trial to evaluate pharmacomechanical catheter-directed thrombolysis for the prevention of post-thrombotic syndromes in patients with proximal deep vein thrombosis. Am Heart J. 2013;165:523–30.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sharafuddin MJ, Gu X, Han YM, et al. Injury potential to venous valves from the Amplatz thrombectomy device. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 1999;10:64–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Vedantham S, Vesely TM, Parti N, et al. Lower extremity venous thrombolysis with adjunctive mechanical thrombectomy. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2002;13:1001–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Cakir V, Gulcu A, Akay E, et al. Use of percutaneous aspiration thrombectomy vs anticoagulation therapy to treat acute iliofemoral venous thrombosis: 1-year follow-up results of a randomised, clinical trial. Cardiovasc Interv Radiol. 2014;37:969–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Plate G, Eklof B, Norgren L, et al. Venous thrombectomy for iliofemoral vein thrombosis – 10-year results of a prospective randomised study. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1997;14:367–74.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Brian Funaki MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Patel, M.V., Funaki, B. (2017). In Patients with Iliofemoral Deep Vein Thrombosis Does Clot Removal Improve Functional Outcome When Compared to Traditional Anticoagulation?. In: Skelly, C., Milner, R. (eds) Difficult Decisions in Vascular Surgery. Difficult Decisions in Surgery: An Evidence-Based Approach. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33293-2_34

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33293-2_34

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33291-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33293-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics