Abstract
In this section the analysis and results from the freight slipstream experiments will be discussed. Throughout the analysis model scale results are presented in terms of a series of container loading configurations defined as consists 1–5, in Fig. 2.8, measured at a series of probe positions defined in Table 2.1. Results will be presented in terms of the equivalent full scale distances in various flow regions at train side and above train roof (Sects. 4.2 and 4.3). Firstly a comparison of flow development for different loading efficiencies is undertaken. By expanding this comparison and focusing on key flow regions (Sect. 4.5), conducting a series of analyses including displacement thickness, turbulence intensity and autocorrelation calculations, a thorough view of slipstream development for a Class 66 hauled container freight train and the influencing factors on slipstream development is possible. Section 4.6 discusses the influence of train speed on slipstream development at model scale. Finally comparisons are made between full and model scale data with conclusions drawn on the suitability of using model scale experiments to understand freight slipstream development (Sect. 4.7).
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baker, C., and A. Quinn. 2012. Train slipstream measurements at Uffington on the Western Main Line. Technical report, Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education at the University of Birmingham.
Baker, C., S. Dalley, T. Johnson, A. Quinn, and N. Wright. 2001. The slipstream and wake of a high-speed train. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 215(2): 83–99.
Baker, C., S. Jordan, T. Gilbert, M. Sterling, and A. Quinn. 2012. RSSB project T750 - Review of Euronorm design requirements for trackside and overhead structures subjected to transient aerodynamic loads. Technical report, Birmingham Centre for Railway Research and Education.
Baker, C.J. 2010. The flow around high speed trains. Journal of Wind Engineering and Industrial Aerodynamics 98: 277–298.
Baker, C.J., A. Quinn, M. Sima, L. Hoefener, and R. Licciardello. 2013. Full-scale measurement and analysis of train slipstreams and wakes: Part 1 ensemble averages. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 0: 1–17.
Box, G.P., and G. Jenkins. 1970. Time series analysis: Forecasting and control. San Francisco: Holden-Day.
Davidson, P. 2004. Turbulence: an introduction for scientists and engineers. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deeg, P., M. Jönsson, H. Kaltenbach, M. Schober, and M. Weise. 2008. Cross-comparison of measurement techniques for the determination of train induced aerodynamic loads on the track bed. Proceedings of the BBAA VI, Milano, Italy.
Durbin, P., and G. Medic. 2007. Fluid dynamics with a computational perspective, vol. 10. Cambridge: Cambridge university press.
George, W. 2004. Lectures in turbulence for the 21st century.
Gil, N., C. Baker, and C. Roberts. 2008. The measurement of train slipstream characteristics using a rotating rail rig. 6th international colloquium on bluff body aerodynamics and its applications.
Hemida, H., and C. Baker. 2010. Large-eddy simulation of the flow around a freight wagon subjected to a crosswind. Computers & Fluids 39(10): 1944–1956.
Hemida, H., N. Gil, and C. Baker. 2010. LES of the slipstream of a rotating train. Journal of Fluids Engineering 132: 051103.
Jordan, S., M. Sterling, and C. Baker. 2009. Modelling the response of a standing person to the slipstream generated by a passenger train. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 223(6(6)): 567–579.
Kundu, P.K., and I.M. Cohen. 2010. Fluid mechanics. San Diego: Academic Press.
Sterling, M., C. Baker, S. Jordan, and T. Johnson. 2008. A study of the slipstreams of high-speed passenger trains and freight trains. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part F: Journal of Rail and Rapid Transit 222(2): 177–193.
Stoesser, T., F. Mathey, J. Frohlich, and W. Rodi. 2003. LES of flow over multiple cubes. Ercoftac Bulletin 56: 15–19.
Taghizadeh, S. 2000. Digital signal processing part3: discrete-time signals & systems case studies.
Temple, J., and S. Dalley. 2001. RAPIDE project; Analysis of the slipstream data. AEA technology rail AEATR-T&S-2001-197. Technical report, AEA technology rail.
Temple, J., and T. Johnson. 2008. Effective management of risk from slipstream effects at trackside and on platforms. Technical report, a report produced for rail safety and standards board.
Torrence, C., and G. Compo. 1998. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 79(1): 61–78.
TSI. 2008. Commission decision of 21 Feb 2008 concerning the technical specification for interoperability relating to the rolling stock subsystem of the trans-European high-speed rail system. Technical report, Official Journal of the European Union.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Soper, D. (2016). Slipstream Data Analysis, Results and Discussion. In: The Aerodynamics of a Container Freight Train. Springer Theses. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33279-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33279-6_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33277-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33279-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)