Abstract
In this paper, I consider how a combined corpus linguistics and conversation analysis methodology can reveal new insights into the relationship between interaction patterns, language use, and learning. The context of the paper is higher education small group teaching sessions and data are drawn from a one million word corpus, the Limerick-Belfast Corpus of Academic Spoken English (LI-BEL CASE. In this study, the analysis is based on 500,000 words of the corpus). The methodology combines corpus linguistics (CL) and applied conversation analysis (CA), enabling quantitative findings to be elaborated by more close-up qualitative analysis of sequences of interaction. This CLCA approach offers a fuller, richer description of small group teaching talk than would be found using either CA or CL alone. I suggest that awareness among practitioners of these relationships would help facilitate interactions which are more conducive to learning and in which students feel more engaged and involved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ädel, A. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of political discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 591–604). London: Routledge.
Basturkmen, H. (2002). Negotiating meaning in seminar-type discussions and EAP. English for Specific Purposes, 21(1), 233–242.
Baumgart, N. (1976). Verbal interaction in university tutorials. Higher Education, 5, 301–317.
Bednarek, M. (2006). Evaluation in media discourse. Analysis of a newspaper corpus. London/New York: Continuum.
Bennett, C., Howe, C., & Truswell, E. (2002). Small group teaching and learning in psychology. York: LTSN Psychology University of York.
Benwell, B. M., & Stokoe, E. H. (2002). Constructing discussion tasks in university tutorials: Shifting dynamics and identities. Discourse Studies, 4(4), 429–453.
Carter, R. A., & Fung, L. (2007). Discourse markers and spoken English: Native and non-native use in pedagogic settings. Applied Linguistics, 28(3), 410–439.
Cotterill, J. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in forensic linguistics? In A. O’Keeffe & M. J. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 164–182). London: Routledge.
Farr, F., Murphy, B., & O’Keeffe, A. (2002). The limerick corpus of Irish English: Design, description and application. Teanga, 21, 5–29.
Gibson, W., Hall, A., & Callery, P. (2006). Topicality and the structure of interactive talk in face-to-face seminar discussions: Implications for research in distributed learning media. British Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 77–94.
Heritage, J. (2004). Conversation analysis and institutional talk: Analysing data. In D. Silverman (Ed.), Qualitative research: Theory, method and practice (2nd ed., pp. 222–245). London, Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi: Sage.
Koester, A. (2006). Investigating workplace discourse. London: Routledge.
Mercer, N. (2000). Words and minds: How we use language to think together. London: Routledge.
O’Halloran, K. (2010). How to use corpus linguistics in the study of media discourse. In A. O’Keeffe & M. McCarthy (Eds.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (pp. 65–89). London: Routledge.
O’Keeffe, A. (2006). Investigating media discourse. London: Routledge.
O’Keeffe, A., & Farr, F. (2003). Using language corpora in language teacher education: Pedagogic, linguistic and cultural insights. TESOL Quarterly, 37(3), 389–418.
O’Keeffe, A., & McCarthy, M. (Eds.). (2010). The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics. London: Routledge.
Scott, M. (2004). WordSmith tools (Version 4). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Seedhouse, P. (2004). The interactional architecture of the language classroom: A conversation analysis perspective. Oxford: Blackwell.
Stokoe, E. H. (2000). Constructing topicality in university students’ small-group discussion: A conversation analytic approach. Language & Education, 14(3), 184–203.
Viechnicki, G. B. (1997). An empirical analysis of participant intentions: Discourse in a graduate seminar. Language & Communication, 17(2), 103–131.
Walsh, S. (2006). Investigating classroom discourse. London: Routledge.
Walsh, S. (2013). Classroom discourse and teacher development. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Walsh, S., & O’Keeffe, A. (2007). Applying CA to a modes analysis of third-level spoken academic discourse. In H. Bowles & P. Seedhouse (Eds.), Conversation analysis and languages for specific purposes (pp. 56–74). Bern: Peter Lang.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Walsh, S. (2016). Applying Corpus Linguistics and Conversation Analysis in the Investigation of Small Group Teaching in Higher Education. In: Chodkiewicz, H., Steinbrich, P., Krzemińska-Adamek, M. (eds) Working with Text and Around Text in Foreign Language Environments. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33272-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33272-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33271-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33272-7
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)