Skip to main content

How to Use Learning Preferences to Optimize Teaching Effectiveness

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Handbook of Clinical Teaching

Abstract

Learners differ in their preferences and aptitudes for acquiring, consolidating, and integrating new information. Similarly, teachers have a variety of preferences, strategies, and strengths for teaching. While it is conceptually attractive to imagine that simply matching “learning styles” and “teaching styles” will lead to better educational outcomes, this conclusion is not supported by the available research. Rather, understanding learning and teaching styles allows the clinical teacher to improve educational outcomes by (a) presenting information in a variety of styles and (b) troubleshoot challenging teacher-student interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cook DA, Smith AJ. Validity of index of learning styles scores: multitrait-multimethod comparison with three cognitive/learning style instruments. Med Educ. 2006;40(9):900–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Romanelli F, Bird E, Ryan M. Learning styles: a review of theory, application, and best practices. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009;73(1):9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Cook DA, Thompson WG, Thomas KG, Thomas MR. Lack of interaction between sensing-intuitive learning styles and problem-first versus information-first instruction: a randomized crossover trial. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2009;14(1):79–90.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Shope TC, Frohna JG, Frohna AZ. Using the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) in the teaching of leadership skills. Med Educ. 2000;34(11):956.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Greenberg LW, Goldberg RM, Foley RP. Learning preference and personality type: their association in paediatric residents. Med Educ. 1996;30(4):307–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Cook DA. Reliability and validity of scores from the index of learning styles. Acad Med. 2005;80(10 Suppl):S97–101.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs Meyers I. MBTI manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Felder RM, Silverman L. Learning and teaching styles in engineering education [Electronic version]. Eng Educ. 1988;78(7):674–81.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsh SK, Kummerow JM. Introduction to type in organizations. 3rd ed. Mountain View: CPP; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul R. Sutton MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sutton, P.R., McPhillips, H.A. (2016). How to Use Learning Preferences to Optimize Teaching Effectiveness. In: Mookherjee, S., Cosgrove, E. (eds) Handbook of Clinical Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33193-5_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33193-5_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33191-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33193-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics