Abstract
An agency leader committed to fair and impartial policing needs an action plan for moving forward. The leader starts by identifying the gaps between what the agency is currently doing and what needs to be done pursuant to the Comprehensive Program to Promote Fair and Impartial Policing. The gaps become the action items for the agency. In acting on those items, the leader might decide to utilize an internal “Fair and Impartial Policing Committee” as was done in Prince William County. Or the chief or sheriff might take advantage of the wisdom, visibility, credibility, and accountability that comes with a police-community advisory board linked to the agency’s efforts. Such advisory boards are supported in the Kansas statutes and the training of those advisory boards is provided by the Kansas Attorney General’s Office. More research is needed to further guide police professionals in their quest to promote bias-free policing. Research exploring threat/aggression stereotypes should be expanded beyond race/ethnicity to explore other groups that are (or are not) linked to crime/aggression and additional research might expand to examine what groups are stereotypically linked to specific types of crime. Research could examine the effectiveness of various bias-reduction techniques on individuals within police departments and explore the suggestion that certain types of police assignments might exacerbate or reduce biases. The community frustration and anger that has characterized the post-Ferguson era has been particularly focused on police use of force, especially deadly force. There is much potential for research to enhance our understanding of the bias-related factors that might impact on officers’ decisions to use force and what interventions can reduce errors, especially errors linked to stereotypes.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The absence of police personnel was to ensure an environment that would encourage participants to speak frankly and openly. An exception was one focus group held with both law enforcement and community member participants.
- 2.
Such a board could have a mandate beyond producing bias-free policing. For instance, in Minneapolis, Chief Harteau has set up the Chief’s Advisory Council with the following mandate: “The Chief's Advisory Council is a conduit to advise and inform the chief on police-community issues. Many of these issues relate to our diverse communities and how to better build relationships to improve safety and improve public trust” (MPD 2014, p. 7).
- 3.
Under the leadership of Ed Pavey the director of the Kansas Law Enforcement Training Center, a unit of the University of Kansas, police personnel around the state are receiving training in the science-based perspective.
- 4.
One example of this expanded focus, albeit related to jurors not police, is the research conducted by Funk and Todorov (2013) looking at the impact of defendant facial tattoos on jury determinations of guilt.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fridell, L. (2017). The Way Ahead. In: Producing Bias-Free Policing. SpringerBriefs in Criminology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33175-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33175-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33173-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33175-1
eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)