Skip to main content

The Ordonomic Approach to Order Ethics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

The ordonomic approach to order ethics contains four elements: (a) a diagnosis of modernity, which identifies the core problems and directs the research strategy to solving them; (b) a rational-choice analysis of social dilemmas, i.e., positive theorizing which informs about the un-intended consequences of intentional inter-action; (c) the idea of orthogonal positions, i.e., normative theorizing that aims at providing reform orientation while at the same time systematically avoiding controversial value statements; (d) a scheme of three social arenas that helps to understand the interplay between institutions and ideas in societal learning processes.

Kurzfassung

Der ordonomische Ansatz zur Ordnungsethik besteht aus vier Elementen: (a) einer Diagnose der Moderne, die die Kernprobleme identifiziert und die Forschungsstrategie auf Problemlösungen ausrichtet; (b) eine Rational-Choice-Analyse sozialer Dilemmata, also eine positive Modelltheorie, die über die nicht-intendierten Effekte intentionaler Interaktionen informiert; (c) das Konzept orthogonaler Positionierung, also eine normative Modelltheorie, die auf intellektuelle Orientierungsleistungen abzielt und dabei strittige Werturteile systematisch vermeidet; (d) eine Drei-Ebenen-Analyse, die das für gesellschaftliche Lernprozesse konstitutive Zusammenspiel von Ideen und Institutionen verständlich werden lässt.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Beckmann, Markus, and Ingo Pies. 2008a. Ordo-responsibility—conceptual reflections towards a semantic innovation. Corporate Citizenship. In Contractarianism and ethical theory. eds. Jesús Conill, Christoph Luetge, and Tatjana Schönwälder-Kuntze, 87–115. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Markus, and Ingo Pies. 2008b. Sustainability by corporate citizenship. The moral dimension of sustainability. The Journal of Corporate Citizenship (31), autumn 2008, 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Markus, Stefan Hielscher, and Ingo Pies. 2012a. Commitment strategies for sustainability: How business firms can transform trade-offs into win-win outcomes. Business Strategy and the Environment. doi:10.1002/bse.1758.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann, Markus, Ingo Pies, and Alexandra von Winning. 2012b. Passion and compassion as strategy drivers for sustainable value creation: An ordonomic perspective on social and ecological entrepreneurship. Economic and Environmental Studies 12(3), 191–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, Samuel. 2004. Microeconomics. In Behavior, institutions, and evolution. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, James M. 1989. The relatively absolute absolutes. In Essays on the political economy. eds. James M. Buchanan, 32–46. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buttkereit, Sören, and Ingo Pies. 2008. Social dilemmas and the social contract. In Corporate citizenship, contractarianism and ethical theory. eds. Jesús Conill, Christoph Luetge, and Tatjana Schönwälder-Kuntze, 135–147. Farnham, Burlington: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, Gregory. 2007. A farewell to alms. A brief economic history of the world. Princeton, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galor, Oded. 2011. Unified growth theory. Princeton, Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardimon, Michael O. 1994. Hegel’s social philosophy. The project of reconciliation. Cambridge, New York, Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardin, Garrett. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science, New Series 162(3859): 1243–1248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hielscher, Stefan, Ingo Pies, and Vladislav Valentinov. 2012. How to foster social progress: An ordonomic perspective on progressive institutional change. Journal of Economic Issues (JEI) XLVI(3):779–797.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lippmann, Walter. 1929, 2009. A preface to morals, 6th ed. New Brunswick, London: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ostrom, Elinor. 2012. The future of the commons: Beyond market failure and government regulation. London: Institute of Economic Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petrick, Martin, and Ingo Pies. 2007. In search for rules that secure gains from cooperation: The heuristic value of social dilemmas for normative institutional economics. European Journal of Law and Economics 23(3): 251–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo. 2000. Ordnungspolitik in der Demokratie. Ein ökonomischer Ansatz diskursiver Politikberatung. Tübingen: Mohr-Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, and Claudia Schott. 2001. Heroin: The case for prescription. In High time for reform: drug policy for the 21st century. eds. Selina Chen, and Edward Skidelsky, 113–126. London: Social Market Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, and Stefan Hielscher. 2009a. The international provision of pharmaceuticals: A comparison of two alternative argumentative strategies for global ethics. Journal of Global Ethics 7(1): 73–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, and Stefan Hielscher. 2009b. The role of corporate citizens in fighting poverty: An ordonomic approach to global justice. In Absolute poverty and global justice. eds. Elke Mack, Michael Schramm, Stephan Klasen, and Thomas Pogge, 233–247. Aldershot, London: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Stefan Hielscher, and Markus Beckmann. 2009. Moral commitments and the societal role of business: An ordonomic approach to corporate citizenship. Business Ethics Quarterly 19(3):375–401.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Markus Beckmann, and Stefan Hielscher. 2010. Value creation, management competencies, and global corporate citizenship: An ordonomic approach to business ethics in the age of globalization. Journal of Business Ethics 94: 265–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Markus Beckmann, and Stefan Hielscher. 2011. Competitive markets, corporate firms, and new governance—an ordonomic conceptualization. Corporate citizenship and new governance—the political role of corporations. eds. Ingo Pies, and Peter Koslowski, 171–188. Dordrecht u.a.O.: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, and Stefan Hielscher. 2012. Gründe versus Anreize? Ein ordonomischer Werkstattbericht in sechs Thesen. In Welt der Gründe, Deutsches Jahrbuch für Philosophie. eds. Nida-Rümelin Julian, and Elif Özmen, Band 4, 215–230 (XXII. Deutscher Kongress für Philosophie, 11–15. September 2011 an der Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, Kolloquienbeiträge), Hamburg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Markus Beckmann, and Stefan Hielscher. 2013a. The political role of the business firm: An ordonomic concept of corporate citizenship developed in comparison with the aristotelian idea of individual citizenship. Business & Society 0007650313483484, first published on April 17, 2013 as doi:10.1177/0007650313483484.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Matthias Georg Will, Thomas Glauben, and Sören Prehn. 2013b. Hungermakers?—Why futures market activities by index funds are promoting the common good, Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013–19 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pies, Ingo, Matthias Georg Will, Thomas Glauben, and Sören Prehn. 2013c. The ethics of financial speculation in futures markets. Diskussionspapier Nr. 2013–21 des Lehrstuhls für Wirtschaftsethik an der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, Halle.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1971. A theory of justice. Oxford etc.: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 1993. Political liberalism, (Columbia University Press), New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, John. 2001. Justice as fairness. A restatement. ed. Erin Kelly. Cambridge, MA, London: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1911, 2006. Theorie der wirtschaftlichen Entwicklung. Nachdruck der ersten Auflage von 1912 [eigentlich 1911, I.P.], herausgegeben und ergänzt um eine Einleitung von Jochen Röpke und Olaf Stiller, Berlin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagorin, Perez. 2003 How the idea of religious toleration came to the west. Princeton, Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ingo Pies .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Pies, I. (2016). The Ordonomic Approach to Order Ethics. In: Luetge, C., Mukerji, N. (eds) Order Ethics: An Ethical Framework for the Social Market Economy . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33151-5_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics