Advertisement

Management System of Heterogeneous Software-Defined Networking Controllers

  • Heng Qi
  • Keqiu Li
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Electrical and Computer Engineering book series (BRIEFSELECTRIC)

Abstract

In the previous chapter, we studied the controller placement problem to improve the performance of the distributed control plane. When placing multiple controllers into their proper positions, the management of controllers is an important problem. In the distributed control plane, each software-defined networking (SDN) controller has its own control domain. To realize entire network control and management, these controllers must communicate with each other. However, there are no standard communication interfaces between controllers in the standard architecture of SDN. In particular, when there are heterogeneous controllers in a large-scale network, it is very difficult to coordinate these controllers to improve control plane performance. Moreover, heterogeneous controllers provide entirely different application programming interfaces (APIs) for users, leading to difficulties in management and application development. To address this problem, we propose a controller management system that consists of a heterogeneous controller management (HCM) module, domain relationships management (DRM) module, database module, and front-end module. This system can generate a global network view by collecting network information from a group of controllers while providing unified APIs for application developers that shield the differences among heterogeneous controllers.

References

  1. 1.
    H. Yin, H. Xie, T. Tsou, et al. SDNi: A Message Exchange Protocol for Software Defined Networks (SDNS) across Multiple Domains. [Online]. Available: https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-yin-sdn-sdni-00.
  2. 2.
    P. Lin, J. Bi, Z. Chen, et al. WE-bridge: West-East Bridge for SDN Inter-domain Network Peering. Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Conference on Computer Communications Workshops (INFOCOM Workshops). IEEE, 2014: 111–112.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    P. Lin, J. Bi, S. Wolff, et al. A West-East Bridge based SDN Inter-domain Testbed. IEEE Communications Magazine, 2015, 53(2): 190–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    P. Helebrandt and I. Kotuliak. Novel SDN Multi-domain Architecture. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Emerging eLearning Technologies and Applications (ICETA). IEEE, 2014: 139–143.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    S. S. Hayward, S. Natarajan and S. Sezer. A Survey of Security in Software Defined Networks. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 2015, DOI: 10.1109/COMST.2015.2453114.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    H. Yu, K. Li, H. Qi, W. Li and X. Tao. Zebra: An East-West Control Framework For SDN Controllers. Proceedings of the 44th International Conference on Parallel Processing (ICPP). IEEE, 2015: 610–618.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    The Pica8 Openflow Switch, http://www.pica8.org/.
  8. 8.
    The ONetSwitch20 from Meshsr company. http://www.meshsr.com/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heng Qi
    • 1
  • Keqiu Li
    • 1
  1. 1.Dalian University of TechnologyDalianChina

Personalised recommendations