Skip to main content

Developing Robust Climate Policies: A Fuzzy Cognitive Map Approach

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robustness Analysis in Decision Aiding, Optimization, and Analytics

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 241))

Abstract

Climate change has been considered one of the most significant risks for sustainability in our century; in order to move towards low-carbon and climate resilient economies, fundamental changes must take place. In this direction, the European Union has set ambitious goals regarding the transition of its Member States to low carbon societies, but the policy strategies to promote this transition must be socially acceptable and supported. So far, climate policies have been evaluated using quantitative methods, including general equilibrium and integrated assessment models but, despite their undoubted contribution to climate modeling, both the quantitative frameworks used for studying climate change and its impacts and those aiming at policy optimization or evaluation feature significant uncertainties and limitations. In order to overcome these issues, a Fuzzy Cognitive Map based approach is proposed, aiming to directly involve stakeholders and assess human knowledge and expertise. The suggested methodological framework can significantly support climate policy making, by supplementing quantitative models and exploring impacts of selected sets of policies, based on qualitative information deriving from a structured stakeholder engagement process. Finally, an innovative approach of incorporating the concept of time into the methodology is proposed and evaluated, in the aim of enhancing the robustness of transition pathways.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. AdaptCost: Briefing paper 1: Integrated Assessment Models – Africa Results. Stockholm Environment Institute (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Amer, M., Jetter, A., Daim, T.: Development of fuzzy cognitive map (FCM)-based scenarios for wind energy. Int. J. Energy Sect. Manage. 5 (4), 564–584 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Axelrod, R.: The analysis of cognitive maps. In: Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, pp. 55–73. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Barker, T.: Achieving a 10 % cut in Europe’s carbon dioxide emissions using additional excise duties: coordinated, uncoordinated and unilateral action using the econometric model E3ME. Econ. Syst. Res. 11 (4), 401–422 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Bergek, A., Jacobsson, S., Carlsson, B., Lindmark, S., Rickne, A.: Analyzing the functional dynamics of technological innovation systems: a scheme of analysis. Res. Policy 37 (3), 407–429 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Biloslavo, R., Dolinšek, S.: Scenario planning for climate strategies development by integrating group Delphi, AHP and dynamic fuzzy cognitive maps. Foresight 12 (2), 38–48 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Biloslavo, R., Grebenc, A.: Integrating group Delphi, analytic hierarchy process and dynamic fuzzy cognitive maps for a climate warning scenario. Kybernetes 41 (3/4), 414–428 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Bontis, N., Fitz-Enz, J.: Intellectual capital ROI: a causal map of human capital antecedents and consequents. J. Intellect. Cap. 3 (3), 223–247 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Bougon, M., Weick, K., Binkhorst, D.: Cognition in organizations: an analysis of the Utrecht jazz orchestra. Adm. Sci. Q. 22 (4), 606–639 (1977)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bourgani, E., Stylios, C.D., Manis, G., Georgopoulos, V.C.: Integrated approach for developing timed fuzzy cognitive maps. In: Intelligent Systems’ 2014, pp. 193–204. Springer, Berlin (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Brown, S.R.: Political Subjectivity: Applications of Q Methodology in Political Science. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brown, S.M.: Cognitive mapping and repertory grids for qualitative survey research: some comparative observations. J. Manag. Stud. 29 (3), 287–307 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Bukowski, M., Kowal, P.: Large Scale, Multi-Sector DSGE Model as a Climate Policy Assessment Tool. Instytut Badań Strukturalnych, Warszawa (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Bukowski, M., Kowal, P.: Modelling the transition to a low carbon economy with a large scale dsge model of Poland. Technical Report, IBS Technical Paper, Institute for Structural Research, Warsaw (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Carvalho, J.P., Tomè, J.A.: Rule based fuzzy cognitive maps-expressing time in qualitative system dynamics. In: The 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 280–283. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Commission, E.: A roadmap for moving to a competitive low carbon economy in 2050 (2011). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee, and the Committee of Regions, Document COM (2011): 112, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal--content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52011DC0112&from=en

  17. Council, E.: European Council, 4 February 2011, Conclusions (2011). http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%202%202011%20REV%201

  18. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9 (3), 458–467 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dickerson, J., Kosko, B., et al.: Virtual worlds as fuzzy cognitive maps. In: IEEE Virtual Reality Annual International Symposium, pp. 471–477. IEEE (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Eden, C., Ackermann, F.: Strategy Making: The Journey of Strategic Management. Sage, London (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Eden, C., Ackermann, F., Cropper, S.: The analysis of cause maps. J. Manag. Stud. 29 (3), 309–324 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Edenhofer, O., Pichs-Madruga, R., Sokona, Y., Farahani, E., Kadner, S., Seyboth, K., Adler, A., Baum, I., Brunner, S., Eickemeier, P., et al.: Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of Working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, pp. 511–597 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Edmonds, J., Wise, M., MacCracken, C.: Advanced energy technologies and climate change: an analysis using the global change assessment model (GCAM). Fondazione ENI Enrico Mattei (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Fuss, S., Szolgayova, J., Obersteiner, M., Gusti, M.: Investment under market and climate policy uncertainty. Appl. Energy 85 (8), 708–721 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Groumpos, P.P.: Fuzzy cognitive maps: basic theories and their application to complex systems. In: Glykas, M. (ed.) Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, pp. 1–22. Springer, Berlin/ Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hagiwara, M.: Extended fuzzy cognitive maps. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 795–801. IEEE (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Harary, F., Norman, R., Cartwright, D.: Structural Models: An Introduction to the Theory of Directed Graphs. Wiley, New York (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Hare, W.: A Safe Landing for the Climate. State of the World, pp. 13–29. Worldwatch Institute, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Heaps, C.: Long-Range Energy Alternatives Planning (leap) System [software version 2011.0043]. Stockholm Environment Institute, Somerville (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Hobbs, B.F., Ludsin, S.A., Knight, R.L., Ryan, P.A., Biberhofer, J., Ciborowski, J.J.: Fuzzy cognitive mapping as a tool to define management objectives for complex ecosystems. Ecol. Appl. 12 (5), 1548–1565 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Huff, A.S.: Mapping Strategic Thought. Wiley, New York (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Isak, K., Wildenberg, M., Adamescu, M., Skov, F., De Blust, G., Varjopuro, R.: Manual for applying fuzzy cognitive mapping–experiences from ALTER-Net. Alter-Net final report (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Jetter, A.J.: Fuzzy cognitive maps for engineering and technology management: what works in practice? In: Technology Management for the Global Future. PICMET 2006, vol. 2, pp. 498–512. IEEE (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Kabashi, S., Bekteshi, S., Ahmetaj, S., Kabashi, G., Najdovski, D., Zidanšek, A., Šlaus, I.: Effects of kosovo’s energy use scenarios and associated gas emissions on its climate change and sustainable development. Appl. Energy 88 (2), 473–478 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Kandasamy, W., Smarandache, F.: Fuzzy Cognitive Maps and Neutrosophic Cognitive Map. Infinite Study, Phoenix (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Kardaras, D., Karakostas, B.: The use of fuzzy cognitive maps to simulate the information systems strategic planning process. Inf. Softw. Technol. 41 (4), 197–210 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Kelly, D.L., Kolstad, C.D.: Integrated assessment models for climate change control. In: Folmer, H., Tietenberg, T. (eds.) International Yearbook of Environmental and Resource Economics 1999/2000, pp. 171–197. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Kok, K.: The potential of fuzzy cognitive maps for semi-quantitative scenario development, with an example from Brazil. Glob. Environ. Chang. 19 (1), 122–133 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kosko, B.: Fuzzy cognitive maps. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 24 (1), 65–75 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kulmer, V., Koland, O., Steininger, K.W., Fürst, B., Käfer, A.: The interaction of spatial planning and transport policy: a regional perspective on sprawl. J. Transport Land Use 7 (1), 57–77 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Laurenti, R., Lazarevic, D., Poulikidou, S., Montrucchio, V., Frostell, B., Bistagnino, L., Wennersten, R.: Using causal maps to identify potential sources of environmental impact outside the scope of LCA studies: preliminary findings from case studies on washing machines and road vehicles. In: 18th Annual International Sustainable Development Research Conference, 24–26 June 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lazarus, M., Heaps, C., Raskin, P.: Long range energy alternatives planning system (LEAP). Reference Manual. Boston Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Boston (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Lee, K.C., Kim, J.S., Chung, N.H., Kwon, S.J.: Fuzzy cognitive map approach to web-mining inference amplification. Expert Syst. Appl. 22 (3), 197–211 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lee, K.C., Lee, H., Lee, N., Lim, J.: An agent-based fuzzy cognitive map approach to the strategic marketing planning for industrial firms. Ind. Mark. Manag. 42 (4), 552–563 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Lopolito, A., Nardone, G., Prosperi, M., Sisto, R., Stasi, A.: Modeling the bio-refinery industry in rural areas: a participatory approach for policy options comparison. Ecol. Econ. 72, 18–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Nordhaus, W.D.: The ‘dice’ model: background and structure of a dynamic integrated climate-economy model of the economics of global warming. Technical Report, Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics, Yale University (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  47. OECD: The Economic Consequences of Climate Change. OECD Publishing, Paris (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olazabal, M.: Sustainable urban development under climate change and resource scarcity. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Ortiz, R.A., Golub, A., Lugovoy, O., Markandya, A., Wang, J.: The DICER model: methodological issues and initial results. Technical Report, Basque Centre for Climate Change/Klima Aldaketa Ikergai (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Ozesmi, U.: Ecosystems in the mind: fuzzy cognitive maps of the kizilirmak delta wetlands in turkey. Ph.D. thesis, University of Minnesota (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Özesmi, U., Özesmi, S.L.: Ecological models based on people’s knowledge: a multi-step fuzzy cognitive mapping approach. Ecol. Model. 176 (1), 43–64 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Papageorgiou, E., Kontogianni, A.: Using fuzzy cognitive mapping in environmental decision making and management: a methodological primer and an application. In: Young, S.S., Silvern, S.E. (eds.) International Perspectives on Global Environmental Change, pp. 427–450. INTECH, Rijeka (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Papageorgiou, E., Spyridonos, P., Glotsos, D.T., Stylios, C., Ravazoula, P., Nikiforidis, G., Groumpos, P.: Brain tumor characterization using the soft computing technique of fuzzy cognitive maps. Appl. Soft Comput. 8 (1), 820–828 (2008). doi:10.1016/j.asoc.2007.06.006.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Papageorgiou, E., Markinos, A., Gemtos, T.: Soft computing technique of fuzzy cognitive maps to connect yield defining parameters with yield in cotton crop production in central Greece as a basis for a decision support system for precision agriculture application. In: Glykas, M. (ed.) Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, pp. 325–362. Springer, Berlin/Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  55. Papaioannou, M., Neocleous, C., Papageorgiou, C., Schizas, C.: A fuzzy cognitive map model of the repercussions of Greek PSI on Cypriot economy. In: 14th IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence and Informatics (CINTI), pp. 255–260. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Park, K.S., Kim, S.H.: Fuzzy cognitive maps considering time relationships. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 42 (2), 157–168 (1995). doi:10.1006/ijhc.1995.1007.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Roberts, F.: The questionnaire method. In: Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, pp. 333–342. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Rode, J., Crassard, F.: The Evolution of Building Integrated Photovoltaics (BIPV) in the German and French Technological Innovation Systems for Solar Cells. Chalmers University of Technology, Gothenburg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  59. Scasny, M., Pisa, V., Pollit, H., Chewpreecha, U.: Analyzing macroeconomic effects of environmental taxation in the Czech Republic with the econometric E3ME model. Czech J. Econ. Finance 59 (5), 460–491 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  60. Schneider, M., Shnaider, E., Kandel, A., Chew, G.: Automatic construction of FCMs. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 93 (2), 161–172 (1998). doi:10.1016/s0165-0114(96)00218-7.

    Google Scholar 

  61. Smith, J., Schellnhuber, H., Mirza, M.: Vulnerability to climate change and reasons for concern: a synthesis. In: McCarthy, J.J., White, K.S., Canziani, O., Leary, N., Dokken, D.J. (eds.) Climate Change 2001: Impacts: Adaptation and Vulnerability, pp. 913–967. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  62. Stach, W., Kurgan, L., Pedrycz, W.: Expert-based and computational methods for developing fuzzy cognitive maps. In: Glykas, M. (ed.) Fuzzy Cognitive Maps, pp. 325–362. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  63. Stocker, T., Qin, D., Plattner, G.K., Tignor, M., Allen, S.K., Boschung, J., Nauels, A., Xia, Y., Bex, V., Midgley, P.M.: Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge/New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  64. Styblinski, M., Meyer, B.: Signal flow graphs vs fuzzy cognitive maps in application to qualitative circuit analysis. Int. J. Man Mach. Stud. 35 (2), 175–186 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Stylios, C.D., Groumpos, P.P.: Modeling complex systems using fuzzy cognitive maps. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. A Syst. Hum. 34 (1), 155–162 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Thomas, S.: The Analytic Hierarchy Process - Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation. McGraw-Hill, New York (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  67. UNFCCC: Report of the Conference of the Parties on Its Sixteenth Session, Held in Cancun from 29 November to 10 December 2010. FCCC/CP/2010/7/Add. 1, 15 March 2011, http://unfccc.int/files/na/application/pdf/07a01--1.pdf

  68. UNFCCC: Adoption of the Paris Agreement, Proposal by the President, Draft Decision –/cp.21. Conference of the Parties, 21st Session (2015). http://unfccc.int/resource/docs/2015/cop21/eng/l09r01.pdf

  69. van Vliet, M., Kok, K., Veldkamp, T.: Linking stakeholders and modellers in scenario studies: the use of fuzzy cognitive maps as a communication and learning tool. Futures 42 (1), 1–14 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Van Vuuren, D.P., Den Elzen, M.G., Lucas, P.L., Eickhout, B., Strengers, B.J., van Ruijven, B., Wonink, S., van Houdt, R.: Stabilizing greenhouse gas concentrations at low levels: an assessment of reduction strategies and costs. Clim. Chang. 81 (2), 119–159 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Vidican, G., Samulewicz, D., McElvaney, L.: Challenges to developing technological innovation systems energy in Abu Dhabi. In: The 8th Triple Helix Conference, Madrid (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  72. Wang, K., Wang, C., Chen, J.: Analysis of the economic impact of different Chinese climate policy options based on a CGE model incorporating endogenous technological change. Energy Policy 37 (8), 2930–2940 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Watkiss, P., Downing, T., Dyszynski, J.: AdaptCost Project: Analysis of the Economic Costs of Climate Change Adaptation in Africa. UNEP, Nairobi (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  74. Wei, Z., Lu, L., Yanchun, Z.: Using fuzzy cognitive time maps for modeling and evaluating trust dynamics in the virtual enterprises. Expert Syst. Appl. 35 (4), 1583–1592 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Weyant, J., Davidson, O., Dowlabathi, H., Edmonds, J., Grubb, M., Parson, E., Cline, W.: Integrated assessment of climate change: an overview and comparison of approaches and results. In: Bruce, J., Lee, H., Haites, E. (eds.) Climate Change 1995: Economic and Social Dimensions of Climate, pp. 367–396. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  76. Wiseman, J., Edwards, T., Luckins, K.: Post carbon pathways: A meta-analysis of 18 large-scale post carbon economy transition strategies. Environ. Innov. Soc. Transit. 8, 76–93 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Wrightson, M.: The documentary coding method. In: Axelrod, R. (ed.) Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elites, pp. 291–332. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    Google Scholar 

  78. Xirogiannis, G., Glykas, M.: Fuzzy cognitive maps in business analysis and performance-driven change. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 51 (3), 334–351 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The most important part of this research is based on the H2020 European Commission Project “Transitions pathways and risk analysis for climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies—TRANSrisk” under grant agreement No. 642260. The sole responsibility for the content of this chapter lies with the authors. It does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the European Commission.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandros Nikas .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Nikas, A., Doukas, H. (2016). Developing Robust Climate Policies: A Fuzzy Cognitive Map Approach. In: Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C., Grigoroudis, E. (eds) Robustness Analysis in Decision Aiding, Optimization, and Analytics. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 241. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33121-8_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics