Abstract
This chapter investigates how technology transforms products and their aesthetics, making it possible to have dynamic sensory features. The chapter also introduces the concept of dynamic aesthetics, which stems from the merging of physical with digital in the field of product design. The relation between the object’s physical and temporal form is explained, as means to create aesthetic experiences. The concept of dynamic products refers to artefacts showing sensory features (visual, tactile, auditory and olfactory) that change in a proactive and reversible way over time. The possibility to use these dynamic changes in the product’s sensory appearance as media to convey dynamic messages is introduced, as an alternative to conventional digital interfaces. At the end of the chapter, the research questions and the methodology followed to explore the field of dynamic products are explained.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Baglieri, E., Zamboni, S., Secchi, R., & Rampino, L. (2009). Design as a strategic competence for continuous innovation. Proceedings of the Tsinghua International Design Management Symposium (pp. 315–322). Salford, UK: Adelphi Research Institute.
Chi, D., Costa, M., Zhao, L., & Badler, N. (2000, July). The EMOTE model for effort and shape. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 173–182). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
Colombo, S., Djajadiningrat, T., & Rampino, L. (2015). Tangible, smart and dynamic objects. How the new aesthetics affects meaning and experience. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement, DeSForM, 2015, 12–18.
Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., & Overbeeke, K. (2004). Tangible products: Redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 294–309.
Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., & Stienstra, M. (2007). Easy doesn’t do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 657–676.
Desmet, P. (2012). Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions. International Journal of Design, 6(2).
Drever, E. (2003). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scalex research. A teacher’s guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.
Dunne, A. (2005). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. The MIT Press.
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.
Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.
Fredrickson, B. L. & Cohn, M. A. (2010). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.). Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press.
Hallnäs, L. & Redström, J. (2000). Slow technology. Designing For reflection. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer.
Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Vol. 4, p. 1).
Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157.
Jones J.C. (1992). Design methods, second edition. Wiley.
Jordan, P. W. (2002) Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC press.
Kaylo, J. (2009). Anima and animus embodied: Jungian gender and Laban movement analysis; body, movement and dance in psychotherapy. An International Journal for Theory, Research and Practice, 4(3).
Khambete, P., & Athavankar, U. (2010). Grounded theory: An effective method for user experience design research. Design Thoughts, 11–24.
Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., & Donaldson, J. (2007). Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 239–254. ACM.
Matthews, T., Dey, A. K., Mankoff, J., Carter, S., & Rattenbury, T. (2004). A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 247–256).
Mazé, R. (2007). Occupying time: Design, time, and the form of interaction. Axl Books.
Pedersen, E. R., & Sokoler, T. (1997). AROMA: Abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 51–58).
Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (269–276).
Pousman, Z., & Stasko, J. (2006). A taxonomy of ambient information systems: Four patterns of design. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 67–74).
Ross, P., & Wensveen, S. (2010). Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3–13.
Saikaly, F. (2005). Approaches to design research: Towards the designerly way. In sixth international conference of the European Academy of Design (EAD06), University of the Arts, Bremen, Germany.
Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P. (2008). Product experience, Elsevier.
Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic books.
Strong, R. & Gaver. B. (1996). Feather, scent and shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. Proceedings of CSCW ‘96 (pp 29–30).
Udsen, L. E., & Jørgensen, A. H. (2005). The aesthetic turn: Unravelling recent aesthetic approaches to human-computer interaction. Digital Creativity, 16(04), 205–216.
Vallgårda, A. (2014). Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), 577–592.
Vallgårda, A., & Sokoler, T. (2010). A material strategy: Exploring material properties of computers. International Journal of Design, 4(3), 1–14.
Vallgårda, A., Winther, M., Mørch, N., & Vizer, E. E. (2015). Temporal form in interaction design. International Journal of Design, 9(3), 1–15.
Van Campenhout, L., Frens, J., Overbeeke, C., Standaert, A., & Peremans, H. (2013). Physical interaction in a dematerialized world. International Journal of Design, 7(1), 1–18.
Wensveen, S. A., Djajadiningrat, J. P., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2004). Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 177–184). ACM.
Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., & Yarin, P. (1998). Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In Cooperative buildings: Integrating information, organization, and architecture (pp. 22–32). Springer.
Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 310–319).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Colombo, S. (2016). The Emerging Area of Dynamic Products. In: Dynamic Products. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33117-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33117-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33116-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33117-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)