Skip to main content

The Emerging Area of Dynamic Products

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Dynamic Products

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology ((BRIEFSPOLIMI))

  • 399 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter investigates how technology transforms products and their aesthetics, making it possible to have dynamic sensory features. The chapter also introduces the concept of dynamic aesthetics, which stems from the merging of physical with digital in the field of product design. The relation between the object’s physical and temporal form is explained, as means to create aesthetic experiences. The concept of dynamic products refers to artefacts showing sensory features (visual, tactile, auditory and olfactory) that change in a proactive and reversible way over time. The possibility to use these dynamic changes in the product’s sensory appearance as media to convey dynamic messages is introduced, as an alternative to conventional digital interfaces. At the end of the chapter, the research questions and the methodology followed to explore the field of dynamic products are explained.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Baglieri, E., Zamboni, S., Secchi, R., & Rampino, L. (2009). Design as a strategic competence for continuous innovation. Proceedings of the Tsinghua International Design Management Symposium (pp. 315–322). Salford, UK: Adelphi Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, D., Costa, M., Zhao, L., & Badler, N. (2000, July). The EMOTE model for effort and shape. In Proceedings of the 27th Annual Conference on Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques (pp. 173–182). ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Colombo, S., Djajadiningrat, T., & Rampino, L. (2015). Tangible, smart and dynamic objects. How the new aesthetics affects meaning and experience. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Design and Semantics of Form and Movement, DeSForM, 2015, 12–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Djajadiningrat, T., Wensveen, S., Frens, J., & Overbeeke, K. (2004). Tangible products: Redressing the balance between appearance and action. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 8(5), 294–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Djajadiningrat, T., Matthews, B., & Stienstra, M. (2007). Easy doesn’t do it: Skill and expression in tangible aesthetics. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 11(8), 657–676.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desmet, P. (2012). Faces of product pleasure: 25 positive emotions in human-product interactions. International Journal of Design, 6(2).

    Google Scholar 

  • Drever, E. (2003). Using semi-structured interviews in small-scalex research. A teacher’s guide. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, A. (2005). Hertzian tales: Electronic products, aesthetic experience, and critical design. The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theory from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frayling, C. (1993). Research in art and design. Royal College of Art Research Papers, 1(1), 1–5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fredrickson, B. L. & Cohn, M. A. (2010). Positive emotions. In M. Lewis, J. M. Haviland-Jones, & L. F. Barrett (Eds.). Handbook of emotions. Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallnäs, L. & Redström, J. (2000). Slow technology. Designing For reflection. Journal of Personal and Ubiquitous Computing. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., & Zubek, R. (2004). MDA: A formal approach to game design and game research. In Proceedings of the AAAI Workshop on Challenges in Game AI (Vol. 4, p. 1).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hekkert, P. (2006). Design aesthetics: Principles of pleasure in design. Psychology Science, 48(2), 157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones J.C. (1992). Design methods, second edition. Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, P. W. (2002) Designing pleasurable products: An introduction to the new human factors. CRC press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaylo, J. (2009). Anima and animus embodied: Jungian gender and Laban movement analysis; body, movement and dance in psychotherapy. An International Journal for Theory, Research and Practice, 4(3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Khambete, P., & Athavankar, U. (2010). Grounded theory: An effective method for user experience design research. Design Thoughts, 11–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Y. K., Stolterman, E., Jung, H., & Donaldson, J. (2007). Interaction gestalt and the design of aesthetic interactions. Proceedings of the Conference on Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, 239–254. ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matthews, T., Dey, A. K., Mankoff, J., Carter, S., & Rattenbury, T. (2004). A toolkit for managing user attention in peripheral displays. Proceedings of the 17th Annual ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology (pp. 247–256).

    Google Scholar 

  • Mazé, R. (2007). Occupying time: Design, time, and the form of interaction. Axl Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pedersen, E. R., & Sokoler, T. (1997). AROMA: Abstract representation of presence supporting mutual awareness. Proceedings of the ACM SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 51–58).

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersen, M. G., Iversen, O. S., Krogh, P. G., & Ludvigsen, M. (2004). Aesthetic interaction: A pragmatist’s aesthetics of interactive systems. Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems: Processes, Practices, Methods, and Techniques (269–276).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pousman, Z., & Stasko, J. (2006). A taxonomy of ambient information systems: Four patterns of design. Proceedings of the Working Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (pp. 67–74).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, P., & Wensveen, S. (2010). Designing aesthetics of behavior in interaction: Using aesthetic experience as a mechanism for design. International Journal of Design, 4(2), 3–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saikaly, F. (2005). Approaches to design research: Towards the designerly way. In sixth international conference of the European Academy of Design (EAD06), University of the Arts, Bremen, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schifferstein, H.N.J., Hekkert, P. (2008). Product experience, Elsevier.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schön, D. A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action (Vol. 5126). Basic books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strong, R. & Gaver. B. (1996). Feather, scent and shaker: Supporting simple intimacy. Proceedings of CSCW ‘96 (pp 29–30).

    Google Scholar 

  • Udsen, L. E., & Jørgensen, A. H. (2005). The aesthetic turn: Unravelling recent aesthetic approaches to human-computer interaction. Digital Creativity, 16(04), 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VallgÃ¥rda, A. (2014). Giving form to computational things: Developing a practice of interaction design. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 18(3), 577–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • VallgÃ¥rda, A., & Sokoler, T. (2010). A material strategy: Exploring material properties of computers. International Journal of Design, 4(3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • VallgÃ¥rda, A., Winther, M., Mørch, N., & Vizer, E. E. (2015). Temporal form in interaction design. International Journal of Design, 9(3), 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Campenhout, L., Frens, J., Overbeeke, C., Standaert, A., & Peremans, H. (2013). Physical interaction in a dematerialized world. International Journal of Design, 7(1), 1–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wensveen, S. A., Djajadiningrat, J. P., & Overbeeke, C. J. (2004). Interaction frogger: a design framework to couple action and function through feedback and feedforward. In Proceedings of the 5th conference on Designing interactive systems: processes, practices, methods, and techniques (pp. 177–184). ACM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisneski, C., Ishii, H., Dahley, A., Gorbet, M., Brave, S., Ullmer, B., & Yarin, P. (1998). Ambient displays: Turning architectural space into an interface between people and digital information. In Cooperative buildings: Integrating information, organization, and architecture (pp. 22–32). Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmerman, J., Stolterman, E., Forlizzi, J. (2010). An analysis and critique of research through design: Towards a formalization of a research approach. In Proceedings of the 8th ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (pp. 310–319).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Colombo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Colombo, S. (2016). The Emerging Area of Dynamic Products. In: Dynamic Products. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology(). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33117-1_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33117-1_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33116-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33117-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics