Abstract
Over the past 20 years, the discipline of forensic archaeology has established itself in the United Kingdom as a primary method of detection for buried human remains. This has been achieved predominantly through the recognition of specific variations, patterning and disturbances in landscape, geological, botanical and ground signatures. These interpretations have subsequently been greatly enhanced by an increasingly sophisticated understanding, adoption and utilisation of geophysical search equipment and search techniques. In addition, the application of traditional archaeological excavation methodologies to criminal investigations that involve buried human remains can be seen to have become an important milestone in optimising an investigating team’s ability to elucidate and extract evidence from the grave and burial environment (Hunter et al. 1995; Groen et al. 2015).
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) (2006) Murder investigation manual. National Centre of Policing Excellence, Wyboston
Davenport GC, France DL, Griffin TJ, Swanburg JG, Lindemann JW, Tranunell V, Armbrust CT, Kondrateiff B, Nelson A, Castellano K, Hopkins D (1992) A multidisciplinary approach to the detection of clandestine graves. J Forensic Sci 37:1445–1458
Dawson LA, Hillier S (2009) Measurement of soil characteristics for forensic applications. Surf Interface Anal 42:363–377
Dawson LA, Mayes RW (2014) Criminal and environmental soil forensics: soil as physical evidence in forensic investigations. In: Murphy BL, Morrison RD (eds) Introduction to environmental forensics, 3rd edn. Academic, Oxford, pp 457–486
Donnelly LJ, Harrison M (2013) Geomorphological and geoforensic interpretation of maps, aerial imagery, conditions of diggability and the colour coded RAG prioritisation system in searches for criminal burials. In: Pirrie D, Ruffell AR, Dawson L (eds) Environmental and criminal geoforensics, vol 384, Special publication. Geological Society of London, London, pp 173–194
Groen WJM, Marquez-Grant N, Janaway R (2015) Forensic archaeology: a global perspective. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford
Harrison M, Donnelly L (2008) Buried homicide victims: applied geoforensics in search to locate strategies. J Homicide Major Incident Investig 4(2):71–86
HOLMES2: The future of crime management technology. www.holmes2.com. [Online. Accessed 19 Oct 2015]
Hunter J, Roberts C, Martin A (1995) Studies in crime: an introduction to forensic archaeology. Routledge, London
Pirrie D, Ruffell A, Dawson LA (eds) (2013) Environmental and criminal geoforensics. Geological Society of London Special Publications, London
Roberts J, Márquez-Grant N (2012) Forensic ecology handbook: from crime scene to court. Wiley-Blackwell, London
Ruffell A, McKinley J (2004) Forensic geoscience: applications of geology, geomorphology and geophysics to criminal investigations. Earth-Sci Rev 69:235–247
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harrison, K., Dawson, L., Mackinnon, G. (2016). Interdisciplinary Approaches to the Search and Location of Buried Bodies: A United Kingdom Context. In: Kars, H., van den Eijkel, L. (eds) Soil in Criminal and Environmental Forensics. Soil Forensics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33115-7_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-33113-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-33115-7
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)