Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Critique and the Deliberate Professional: Framing the New and Enhanced Role of Intermediaries in Digital Culture

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Educating the Deliberate Professional

Part of the book series: Professional and Practice-based Learning ((PPBL,volume 17))

  • 920 Accesses

Abstract

The ‘new spirit of capitalism’ has profoundly transformed the realms of education and culture, while also altering what it means today to be reflexive, and critical more broadly. New problems and constraints have risen, yet new avenues of engagement with cultural content—via Web-based technologies especially—have risen too. The first section of this chapter is dedicated to the new digital ecology where participation and critique are linked to important changes in the nature of cultural gatekeeping. Entrenched intellectuals and intermediaries are currently redefining cultural legitimacy and connoisseurship by crafting a more horizontal, deliberative and thus somewhat democratic public sphere. All of those positive developments should not lead, however, to a blind faith in digital technology. In the second section, it is argued that there is a role for deliberate professionals to participate in the critique of technological infrastructures. There is also a role for them to critique how the organisation and circulation of cultural content, impart visibility to what is too often inscrutable or unaccountable, and question —inside as much as outside universities— how social media platforms create a ‘new normal’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, J. C., & Jacobs, R. (1998). Mass communication, ritual and civil society. In T. Liebes & J. Curran (Eds.), Media, ritual and identity. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, H. S. (1973/2008). Art worlds. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atton, C. (2010). Popular music fanzines: genre, aesthetics, and the “democratic conversation”. Popular Music and Society, 33(4), 517–531.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, D. (2009). Power through the algorithm? Participatory Web culture and the technological unconscious. New Media and Society, 11(6), 985–1002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, M. (1998). The crisis of criticism. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2007). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1977/1980). The production of belief: Contribution to an economy of symbolic goods. Media, Culture and Society, 2, 261–293.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1983). The field of cultural production, or: The economic world reversed. Poetics, 12, 311–356.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowker, G. C., & Leigh Star, S. (1999). Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, T. (2012). Want to be on top? Algorithms powers and the threat of invisibility on Facebook. New Media and Society, 14(7), 1164–1180.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cain Miller, C. (2013, June 19). Privacy officials press Google on its glasses. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/06/19/privacy-officials-worldwide-press-Google-about-glass

  • Capps, R. (2014, July 22). How smartphones have unleashed humanity’s creative potential. Wired. Retrieved from http://www.wired.com/2014/07/smart-phone-creativity/

  • Cronin, A. M. (2004). Regimes of mediation: Advertising practitioners as cultural intermediaries? Consumption, Markets and Culture, 7(4), 349–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dean, J. (2003). Why the Net is not a public sphere. Constellations, 10(1), 95–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Del Aguila-Obra, A. R., Padilla-Meléndez, A., & Serarols-Tarrés, C. (2007). Value creation and new intermediaries on Internet. An exploratory analysis of the online news industry and the Web content aggregators. International Journal of Information Management, 27(3), 187–199.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deuze, M. (2006). Participation, remediation, bricolage: Considering principal components of a digital culture. The Information Society, 22(2), 63–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerlitz, C., & Helmond, A. (2013). The like economy: Social buttons and the data-intensive Web. New Media & Society, 15(8), 1348–1365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2010). The politics of ‘platforms’. New Media & Society, 12(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, T. (2014). The relevance of algorithms. In T. Gillespie & K. Foot (Eds.), Media technologies (pp. 167–194). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1962/1989). The structural transformation of the public sphere. An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge, MA: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (2006). Political communication in media society: Does democracy still enjoy an epistemic dimension? The impact of normative theory on empirical research. Communication Theory, 16, 411–426.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hargittai, E. (2000). Open portals or closed gates? Channeling content on the World Wide Web. Poetics, 27(4), 233–253.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hawkins, R., Mansell, R., & Steinmueller, W. E. (1999). Toward digital intermediation in the information society. Journal of Economic Issues, 33(2), 383–391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hesmondhalgh, D. (2007). Audiences and everyday aesthetics: Talking about good and bad music. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 10(4), 507–527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillis, K., Petit, M., & Jarrett, K. (2013). Google and the culture of search. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hohendahl, P. U. (1982). The institution of criticism. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, R. N. (2007). From mass to public: Rethinking the value of the culture industry. In I. Reed & J. C. Alexander (Eds.), Culture, society and democracy: The interpretive approach. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, P. (2007). Beyond the semantic ‘Big Bang’: Cultural sociology and an aesthetic public sphere. Cultural Sociology, 1(1), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leadbeater, C. (2008). We-think: The power of mass creativity. London: Profile Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lohr, S. (2012, October 12). Drafting antitrust case, F.T.C. raises pressure on Google. The New York Times. Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2012/10/13/technology/ftc-staff-prepares-antitrust-case-against-Google-over-search.html

  • McDonald, R. (2007). The death of the critic. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuigan, J. (2005). The cultural public sphere. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 8(4), 427–443.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKelvey, F. (2010). Ends and ways: The algorithmic politics of network neutrality. Global Media Journal – Canadian Edition, 3(1), 51–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mellet, K., & Beuscart, J. S. (2012). La conversion de la notoriété en ligne. Une étude des trajectoires de vidéastes pro-am. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moor, L. (2012). Beyond cultural intermediaries? A socio-technical perspective on the market for interventions. European Journal of Cultural Studies, 15(5), 563–580.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Negus, K. (2002). The work of cultural intermediaries and the enduring distance between production and consumption. Cultural Studies, 16(4), 501–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1969/1974). The conflict of interpretations. Essays in hermeneutics. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberge, J. (2011). The aesthetic public sphere and the transformation of criticism. Social Semiotics, 21(3), 435–453.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singhal, A. (2008). Technologies behind Google ranking. Retrieved from http://googleblog.blogspot.ca/2008/07/technologies-behind-Google-ranking.html

  • Stamatov, P. (2002). Interpretive activism and the political uses of Verdi’s operas in the 1840s. American Sociological Review, 67, 345–366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terranova, T. (2000). Free labor: Producing culture for the digital economy. Social Text, 18(2), 33–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thrift, N. (2005). Knowing capitalism. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trede, F., & McEwen, C. (2016). Carving out the territory for educating the deliberate professional. In F. Trede & C. McEwen (Eds.), Educating the deliberate professional: Preparing for future practices. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willson, M. (2013). The politics of social filtering. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 20, 218–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, T. (2010). Master switch: The rise and fall of information empires. New York: Vintage Book.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Social Sciences and Humanities, Université du Québec, Institut national de recherche scientifique, Ville de Québec, QC, Canada

    Jonathan Roberge

Authors
  1. Jonathan Roberge
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Roberge .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. The Education For Practice Institute, Charles Sturt University, Silverwater, New South Wales, Australia

    Franziska Trede

  2. The Education For Practice Institute, Charles Sturt University, Silverwater, New South Wales, Australia

    Celina McEwen

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roberge, J. (2016). Critique and the Deliberate Professional: Framing the New and Enhanced Role of Intermediaries in Digital Culture. In: Trede, F., McEwen, C. (eds) Educating the Deliberate Professional. Professional and Practice-based Learning, vol 17. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32958-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32958-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32956-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32958-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation