Skip to main content

From Caring About Sustainability to Developing Care-Ful Engineers

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development

Part of the book series: World Sustainability Series ((WSUSE))

Abstract

Engineering is commonly thought of as a problem-solving profession (e.g. Allenby in Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education: Educating the Stewards of a Sustainable Future. Schenectady, New York, 2009; Zhou in Eur J Eng Educ 37(4):343–353, 2012). Still, good problem-solving depends on good problem-framing, which typically means capturing both the technical and social aspects of the problem at hand. It can though be challenging for engineering students to capture both these aspects of a problem. Cech (Sci Tech Human Values 39(1):42–72, 2014) has pointed out that significant challenges still exist within engineering curricula with regard to “reading” technical problems with multiple layers of meaning. What can be done to better this state of affairs? Fortunately, sustainability issues have caught the attention of this generation of college students (Watson et al. in J Prof Issues Pract 235–243, 2013). Building on the student enthusiasm associated with sustainability may be one way to foster student development regarding how to include ethical dimensions as an integral part of engineering framing and problem solving. We suggest that one option to achieve this is by teaching sustainability using an ethics of care framework that offers elements that more easily engage individuals in problem framing. This approach assumes that because engineering students “care” about sustainability as it applies to their disciplines, faculty can use an ethics of care framework to help students operationalize ethics as an integral component of the engineering decision-making process. By building on these initial lessons, students are better prepared to consider the socio-technical dimensions of engineering problems. Our argument draws upon examples from the University of Portland that demonstrate how students have a difficult time translating ethical theories to engineering problems, and also show how the care ethics approach can manifest itself naturally in the engineering curricula. We hope this paper serves to facilitate efforts to intentionally use sustainability issues to improve the teaching and learning of engineering ethics and further cultivate the T-shaped engineer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ABET. (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allenby B. R. (2009). The challenge of sustainable engineering education. In Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education: Educating the Stewards of a Sustainable Future. Schenectady, New York, June 5–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen, W. R. (2009). Engineering ethics: Outline of an aspirational approach. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2003). Post-normal Science. Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics, International Society for Ecological Economics, February 1–10 .

    Google Scholar 

  • Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heywood, J. (2012). Education at the crossroads: Implications for educational policy makers. 2012 Distinguished lecture. American Society for Engineering Education. San Antonio, TX, June 10–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, S. A., Michelfelder, D., & Nair, I. (2015). Engineering managers and sustainable systems: The need for and challenges of using an ethical framework for transformative leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production,. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.009

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996.aspx.

  • National Institute for Engineering Ethics. (2010). Henry’s daughters © 2010. TX: Lubbock.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riley, D. (2013). Hidden in plain view: Feminists Doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics., 19, 189–206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • University of British Columbia. (2009). Sustainability education at UBC: A student perspective. Kelowna, BC, Canada: Campus Sustainability Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, M.K., Noyes, C., & Rodgers, M. (2013 July). Student perceptions of sustainability education in civil and environmental engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. Journal of Professional Issues and Practice 235–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 82–117p). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (2012). Fostering creative engineers: A key to face the complexity of engineering practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The four senior civil engineering majors at University of Portland who agreed to let us use this example, and the reviewer comments that connected us to related literature.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Diane P. Michelfelder .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Michelfelder, D.P., Jones, S.A. (2016). From Caring About Sustainability to Developing Care-Ful Engineers. In: Leal Filho, W., Nesbit, S. (eds) New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_16

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics