Abstract
Engineering is commonly thought of as a problem-solving profession (e.g. Allenby in Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education: Educating the Stewards of a Sustainable Future. Schenectady, New York, 2009; Zhou in Eur J Eng Educ 37(4):343–353, 2012). Still, good problem-solving depends on good problem-framing, which typically means capturing both the technical and social aspects of the problem at hand. It can though be challenging for engineering students to capture both these aspects of a problem. Cech (Sci Tech Human Values 39(1):42–72, 2014) has pointed out that significant challenges still exist within engineering curricula with regard to “reading” technical problems with multiple layers of meaning. What can be done to better this state of affairs? Fortunately, sustainability issues have caught the attention of this generation of college students (Watson et al. in J Prof Issues Pract 235–243, 2013). Building on the student enthusiasm associated with sustainability may be one way to foster student development regarding how to include ethical dimensions as an integral part of engineering framing and problem solving. We suggest that one option to achieve this is by teaching sustainability using an ethics of care framework that offers elements that more easily engage individuals in problem framing. This approach assumes that because engineering students “care” about sustainability as it applies to their disciplines, faculty can use an ethics of care framework to help students operationalize ethics as an integral component of the engineering decision-making process. By building on these initial lessons, students are better prepared to consider the socio-technical dimensions of engineering problems. Our argument draws upon examples from the University of Portland that demonstrate how students have a difficult time translating ethical theories to engineering problems, and also show how the care ethics approach can manifest itself naturally in the engineering curricula. We hope this paper serves to facilitate efforts to intentionally use sustainability issues to improve the teaching and learning of engineering ethics and further cultivate the T-shaped engineer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABET. (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: Accreditation Board for Engineering and Technology.
Allenby B. R. (2009). The challenge of sustainable engineering education. In Union College Symposium on Engineering and Liberal Education: Educating the Stewards of a Sustainable Future. Schenectady, New York, June 5–6.
Bowen, W. R. (2009). Engineering ethics: Outline of an aspirational approach. Dordrecht, NL: Springer Press.
Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414–424.
Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72.
Funtowicz, S., & Ravetz, J. (2003). Post-normal Science. Internet Encyclopedia of Ecological Economics, International Society for Ecological Economics, February 1–10 .
Held, V. (1993). Feminist morality: Transforming culture, society, and politics. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Heywood, J. (2012). Education at the crossroads: Implications for educational policy makers. 2012 Distinguished lecture. American Society for Engineering Education. San Antonio, TX, June 10–13.
Jones, S. A., Michelfelder, D., & Nair, I. (2015). Engineering managers and sustainable systems: The need for and challenges of using an ethical framework for transformative leadership. Journal of Cleaner Production,. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.02.009
National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Grand Challenges for Engineering. http://www.engineeringchallenges.org/cms/8996.aspx.
National Institute for Engineering Ethics. (2010). Henry’s daughters © 2010. TX: Lubbock.
Noddings, N. (1984). Caring: A feminine approach to ethics and moral education. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching and practice. Journal of Engineering Education, 88(2), 205–212.
Riley, D. (2013). Hidden in plain view: Feminists Doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Journal of Science and Engineering Ethics., 19, 189–206.
University of British Columbia. (2009). Sustainability education at UBC: A student perspective. Kelowna, BC, Canada: Campus Sustainability Office.
Watson, M.K., Noyes, C., & Rodgers, M. (2013 July). Student perceptions of sustainability education in civil and environmental engineering at Georgia Institute of Technology. Journal of Professional Issues and Practice 235–243.
Williams, B. (1973). A critique of utilitarianism. In J. J. C. Smart & B. Williams (Eds.), Utilitarianism: For and against (pp. 82–117p). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zhou, C. (2012). Fostering creative engineers: A key to face the complexity of engineering practice. European Journal of Engineering Education, 37(4), 343–353.
Acknowledgements
The four senior civil engineering majors at University of Portland who agreed to let us use this example, and the reviewer comments that connected us to related literature.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Michelfelder, D.P., Jones, S.A. (2016). From Caring About Sustainability to Developing Care-Ful Engineers. In: Leal Filho, W., Nesbit, S. (eds) New Developments in Engineering Education for Sustainable Development. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_16
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32933-8_16
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32932-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32933-8
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)