Abstract
Universities have been identified as being critical in developing sustainability-focused skillsets and mindsets (UNESCO in United Nations Decade of Education for Sustainable Development 2004–2014, 2004; UNCSD in The future we want, 2012; UE4SD in The state of the art report 2014). A UK-based survey further identified that 80 % of students believe that universities should incorporate sustainable development. Additionally this percentage increases as students progress through their degree (LSIS in Embedding sustainability into teaching, learning and curriculum in the learning and skills sector, 2013). There is also a growing demand from business, for graduates to be sustainability literate, with company leaders increasingly seeing sustainability as one of the top 3 priorities (McKinsey in Sustainability’s strategic worth McKinsey global survey results, 2014). Academic discussions around sustainability are often problematic due to many factors including understanding, relevance and time (LSIS 2013; Lozano 2010). The approach outlined in this chapter acknowledged barriers and utilised a method to mitigate these issues. The process focused on program level mapping and coverage of sustainability as an interdisciplinary concept, using the Macquarie University Sustainability Framework. The initial stages undertaken in 2014 investigated connections to sustainability in four undergraduate programs at Macquarie University: Bachelor of Media (Faculty of Arts); Bachelor of Human Science (Faculty of Human Science); Bachelor of Mechanical Engineering (Faculty of Science), and Bachelor of Business Administration (Faculty of Business and Economics). The programs involved in this phase were chosen because they were not typically ‘sustainability-focused’ degrees. However, mapping showed all programs demonstrated connections to sustainability learning at the program level, covering a minimum of 86 % of the Framework, with the Bachelor of Human Sciences demonstrating 100 % coverage. Evaluation as to whether graduates leave with sustainability skills and knowledge is yet to be completed. Providing evidence of teaching that not just informs, but transforms students will be vital to increasing employability of Macquarie University graduates. Going forward the authors aim to measure the transformational learning of both academics and students. Essentially, external circumstances at a global level dictate that embedding sustainability into the curriculum is a responsibility all universities must undertake. The evidence gathered to date indicates that this is not an impossible mission, so long as a considered methodology and adequate resourcing is in place to support often time-poor academics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
In this context, ‘program’ is equivalent to ‘degree’. Essentially, the grouping of individual units to make a program or degree, leading to a Bachelor qualification. Units are often called ‘courses’ elsewhere.
- 2.
‘Academics’ is the term used in Australia to define teaching staff. Often called ‘Faculty’ elsewhere.
- 3.
People units are designed to give students an understanding of what it means to live in the social world, and to develop cultural or social literacy, while Planet units enable students to develop an understanding of science and the challenges and issues facing the world at present (http://handbook.mq.edu.au/2015/Units/People and http://handbook.mq.edu.au/2015/Units/Planet).
References
Engineers Australia. (2015). Stage 1 competency standard for professional engineer. Available online at https://www.engineersaustralia.org.au/sites/default/files/shado/Education/Program%20Accreditation/110318%20Stage%201%20Professional%20Engineer.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2015.
Fallows, S., & Steven, C. (2000). Building employability skills into the higher education curriculum: A university-wide initiative. Education+Training, 42(2), 75–83. doi:10.1108/00400910010331620
Gardner, H. (2006). Five minds for the future. Boston, Mass: Harvard Business School Press.
Greig, A. J. (2015). Making sustainability part of every student’s curriculum. In Integrative approaches to sustainable development at university level (pp. 27–41). New York: Springer International Publishing.
HEA: The Higher Education Academy. (2014). Students want more on sustainable development from their higher education careers. Available online at https://www.heacademy.ac.uk/about/news/10194. Accessed February 20, 2015.
Johnston, L. F. (2013). Higher education for sustainability: Cases, challenges, and opportunities from across the curriculum. Abingdon: Routledge.
Lozano, R. (2010). Diffusion of sustainable development in universities’ curricula: An empirical example from Cardiff University. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(7), 637–644.
Lozano, R., Lukman, R., Lozano, F. J., Huisingh, D., & Lambrechts, W. (2013). Declarations for sustainability in higher education: Becoming better leaders, through addressing the university system. Journal of Cleaner Production, 48, 10–19.
LSIS: Learning and Skills Improvement Service. (2013). Embedding sustainability into teaching, learning and curriculum in the learning and skills sector. Available online at http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20130802100617/http:/lsis.org.uk/publication-content/embedding-sustainability-teaching-learning-and-curriculum-learning-and-skills. Accessed February 17, 2015.
McKinsey. (2014). Sustainability’s strategic worth McKinsey global survey results. Available online at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/sustainability/sustainabilitys_strategic_worth_mckinsey_global_survey_results. Accessed February 20, 2015.
Tilbury, D. (2011). Assessing ESD experiences during the DESD: An expert review on processes and learning for ESD. Paris: UNESCO. Available online at http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001914/191442e.pdf. Accessed February 21, 2015.
UE4SD: University Educators For Sustainable Development. (2014). The state of the art report. Available online at http://www.ue4sd.eu/images/RegionalMapping/UE4SD_State-of-the-art-report.pdf. Assessed February 17, 2015.
UNCSD: United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development. (2012). The future we want, paragraphs 229–235. Available online at http://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/futurewewant.html. Accessed May 12, 2014.
UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. (2004). United nations decade of education for sustainable development 2004–2014. Available online at http://portal.unesco.org/education/admin/ev.php?URL_ID=27279&URL_DO=DO_TOPIC&URL_SECTION=201. Assessed May 12, 2014.
UNESCO (2014) Roadmap for implementing the Global Action Programme on Education for Sustainable Development. UNESCO: France
Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6(2), 203–218.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Denby, L., Rickards, S. (2016). An Approach to Embedding Sustainability into Undergraduate Curriculum: Macquarie University, Australia Case Study. In: Leal Filho, W., Pace, P. (eds) Teaching Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32928-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32928-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32926-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32928-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)