Skip to main content

Students’ Engagement in an Extension Program in Agroecology for Subsistence Farmers at the Universidad Católica Santa Maria La Antigua (USMA), Panamá

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Teaching Education for Sustainable Development at University Level

Abstract

Experiential learning complements an education for sustainability that aims at becoming transformative in fostering students’ competencies in sustainable development. In this work we assessed the experience of a private institution of higher education in Panamá where a sample of its students was engaged in an extension program for farmers, during the academic year 2014–2015. As part of course work in agroecology, students assisted the investigators with the development of topics and materials to be employed for five one-day workshops that were taught at the university farm, located in Las Minas (Herrera province). In this region, also known as ‘Arco Seco’ or ‘Dry Arc’ region of Panamá the dry season causes severe water stresses. The chronic poverty in the farming communities nearby is strongly related to deforestation and amplified by its effects on the hydrologic water cycle and climate change. These factors put at risk food production and quality of life for the inhabitants in most parts of the region. USMA’s philosophy of education predicates that every student can be a vector (teacher) of positive change in sustainable development. Through this program we were able to put into practice the tenets of USMA’s vision and experience its educational power and benefits.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altieri, M. A. (1995). Agroecology. The science of sustainable agriculture. Boulder, Colorado, USA: Westview Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., Funez-Monzote, F. R., & Petersen, P. (2012). Agroecologically efficient agricultural systems for smallholder farmers: Contributions to food sovereignty. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 32, 1–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altieri, M. A., & Toledo, V. M. (2011). The agroecological revolution in Latin America: rescuing nature, ensuring food sovereignty and empowering peasants. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 38(3), 587–612.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Lloyd, E., & Vatovec, C. (2010). Activating the countryside: Rural power, the power of the rural and the making of rural politics. Sociologia Ruralis, 50(3), 205–224.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beynaghi, A., Moztarzadeh, F., Maknoon, R., Waas, T., Mozafari, M., Hugé, J., et al. (2014). Towards an orientation of higher education in the post Rio + 20 process: How is the game changing? Futures, 63, 49–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borsari, B. (2012). Curriculum framework for sustainability education. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 16(1), 74–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsari, B., Espinosa, J., & Hassán, J. (2014b). Agroecology and a vision for sustainable agriculture in spite of global climate change. Investigación y pensamiento critico., 2(5), 63–69.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsari, B., Neri. D., Ferretti, G., Tavoletti, S., & Wei-Choun Y. (2014a). Critical evaluation of genetic manipulation for improved productivity: Is this a sustainable agenda? In W. B. Campbell & S. Lopez-Ortiz (Eds.), Sustainable food production includes human and environmental health. Springer, Berlin, 233p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Camara-Cabrales, L. (1999). Small farmer migration and the agroforestry alternative in the Panamá Canal Watershed. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 8(3/4), 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cochran, J. B., & Bonnell, R. (2005). Patterns of sustainable agriculture adoption/non-adoption in Panamá. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 23(3), 147–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuellar, M., & Calle, A. (2011). Can we find solutions with people? Participatory action research with small organic producers in Andalusia. Journal of Rural Studies, 27, 372–383.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Desrochers, A. (2004). Water harvesting through ponds in the Arco Seco region of the Republic of Panamá; decision support system for pond storage capacity estimation. Montreal, Canada: Macdonald Campus of McGill University (Masters’ thesis).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson, B. G., & Morales, H. (2010). Latin American agroecologists build a powerful scientific and social movement. Journal of Sustainable Agriculture, 34, 339–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischer, A., & Vasseur, L. (2000). The crisis in shifting agriculture practices and the promise of agroforestry: A review of the Panamanian experience. Biodiversity and Conservation, 9, 739–756.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Glesne, C. (1999). Becoming qualitative researchers: An introduction (2nd ed., 336 p). White Plains, NY: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gliessman, S. R. (2007). Agroecology. The ecology of food systems: CRC Press, Boca Raton, Florida, USA. 371p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, R. R. (1996). Development pathways toward sustainable systems following slash-and- burn. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 58, 75–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heckadon-Moreno, S., & Espinoza-González, J. (Eds.), (1985). Agonia de la Naturaleza.Ensayos sobre el costo ambiental del desarrollo panameño. Panamá: Instituto de Investigacion Agropecuaria de Panama and Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, 327p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hilimire, K., Gliessman, S. R., & Muramoto, J. (2013). Soil fertility and crop growth under poultry/crop integration. Renewable Agriculture and Food Systems, 28(2), 173–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Censo (INEC), Panamá. Censo Nacional de Poblacion y Vivienda: Año (2010). Available at: http://www.contraloria.gob.pa/INEC/Publicaciones/Publicaciones.aspx?ID_SUBCATEGORIA=59&ID_PUBLICACION=362&ID_IDIOMA=1&ID_CATEGORIA=13

  • Isakson, S. R. (2009). No hay ganancia en la milpa: the agrarian question, food sovereignty, and the on-farm conservation of agrobiodiversity in the Guatemalan highlands. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 36(4), 725–759.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. L., & Jackson, L. L. (2002). The farm as natural habitat. Reconnecting food systems with ecosystems (297 p). Washington D.C., USA: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, A., & Sherington, J. (1997). Participatory research methods implementation, effectiveness and institutional context. Agricultural Systems, 55(2), 195–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Méndez, V. E., Bacon, C. M., & Cohen, R. (2013). Agroecology as a transdisciplinary, participatory, and action-oriented approach. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems, 37, 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mozejko, A. (2009). Sustainability, climate change, and carbon sequestration in Panama master’s thesis. Bern, Switzerland: Faculty of Science, University of Bern.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Byrne, D., Dripps, W., & Nicholas, K. A. (2014). Teaching and learning sustainability: An assessment of the curriculum content and structure of sustainability degree programs in higher education. Sustainability Science, 10(1), 43–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onwueme, I., & Borsari, B. (2008). Empowering universities and colleges to become dynamic actors for driving sustainable development. In C. H. Daub, P. Burger & Y. Sherrer (Eds.), Creating Values for Sustainable Development, p. 265. Proceedings of the 2nd International Sustainability Conference, pp. 115–117. Basel, Switzerland. (Extended Abstract).

    Google Scholar 

  • Onwueme, I., Borsari, B., & Leal Filho, W. (2008). An analysis of some paradoxes in alternative agriculture and a vision of sustainability for future food systems. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology, 7(3), 199–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (532 p). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popham, J. W. (1993). Educational evaluation (3rd ed.). MA, Prentice Hall: Needham Heights. 235p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pretty, J. N., Morrison, J. I. L., & Hine, R. E. (2003). Reducing food poverty by increasing agricultural sustainability in the development countries. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 9, 5–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, L., & Quental, C. (2014). Research for better health: The Panamanian priority-setting experience and the need for a new process. Health Research Policy and Systems, 12, 38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruttan, V. W. (2000). The continuing challenge of food production in the 21st century: From science to sustainable agriculture. Environment, 42(10), 25–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Balzer, C., Hill, J., & Befort, B. L. (2011). Global food demand and sustainable intensification of agriculture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 108(50), 20260–20264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tilman, D., Cassman, K. G., Matson, P. A., Naylor, R., & Polasky, S. (2002). Agricultural sustainability and intensive production practices. Nature, 418, 671–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wezel, A., Bellon, S., Doré, T., Francis, C., Vallod, D., & David, C. (2009). Agroecology as a science, a movement and a practice. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 29, 503–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by a Fulbright grant (award #: 48142622) that was awarded to the senior author in 2014. The authors are grateful to the criticism and thoughtful comments of two anonymous reviewers who helped improve the quality of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Bruno Borsari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Borsari, B., De Gracia, N.P., Peralta, J.C. (2016). Students’ Engagement in an Extension Program in Agroecology for Subsistence Farmers at the Universidad Católica Santa Maria La Antigua (USMA), Panamá. In: Leal Filho, W., Pace, P. (eds) Teaching Education for Sustainable Development at University Level. World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32928-4_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics