- 567 Downloads
Chapter 5 presents a detailed ‘map’ of the methods adopted to collect and analyse the data in this policy analysis research. The rationale for using qualitative methods is explained, highlighting the sensitivity to context and the support for in-depth, holistic analysis which was sought in this study. To investigate the research questions about relevant policy influences, texts, practices/effects and outcomes, both documents and interviews were used as data sources, and the strengths and weaknesses of each are examined. The complex sampling across ‘global’ (OECD), ‘national’ (Australia, UK and US) and ‘local’ (university) levels of the policy trajectory is tabulated, as is interview participant coding to provide an audit trail and protection of anonymity. Critical discourse analysis (CDA) is the primary mechanism of data analysis because it highlights the interrogation of texts within their wider social and political contexts; a specific example of interrogation of a policy text using CDA is included. A discussion of ethical considerations closes this chapter.
KeywordElite interviews Critical discourse analysis (CDA)
- Australian Government (2009). Transforming Australia’s higher education system. Canberra: Author.Google Scholar
- Australian Learning and Teaching Council (2010). Learning and Teaching Academic Standards project: Final report. Author. http://www.olt.gov.au/system/files/altc_standards.finalreport.pdf. Accessed 11 May 2016.
- Ball, S. J. (1994). Education reform: A critical and post-structural approach. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
- Bradley, D., Noonan, P., Nugent, H., & Scales, B. (2008). Review of Australian higher education: Final report. Canberra: Department of Education, Employment and Workplace Relations.Google Scholar
- Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., & Manion, L. (1994). Research methods in education (4th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2013). Research methods in education (7th ed.). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2008). The landscape of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse and text: Textual analysis for social research. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Fairclough, N. (2010). Critical discourse analysis: The critical study of language (2nd ed.). London: Longman.Google Scholar
- Gillard, J. (2009). Universities Australia Conference – 4 March 2009 – speech. Ministers’ Media Centre. http://pandora.nla.gov.au/pan/80087/20100127-1030/www.deewr.gov.au/Ministers/Gillard/Media/Speeches/Pages/Article_090304_155721.html. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- Higher Education Standards Panel (2013). Draft standards for course design and learning outcomes. Australian Government. https://docs.education.gov.au/node/37821. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- Northcote, M. T. (2012). Selecting criteria to evaluate qualitative research. Avondale College of Higher Education. http://research.avondale.edu.au/edu_papers/38. Accessed 12 May 2016.
- Odendahl, T., & Shaw, A. M. (2002). Interviewing elites. In J. F. Gubrium & J. A. Holstein (Eds.), Handbook of interview research: Context and method (pp. 299–316). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Palys, T. (2008). Purposive sampling. In L. Given (Ed.), The SAGE encyclopedia of qualitative research methods (pp. 698–699). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Punch, K. F. (2005). Introduction to social research: Quantitative and qualitative approaches (2nd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Rizvi, F., & Lingard, B. (2010). Globalizing education policy. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. London: Sage.Google Scholar
- Stake, R. E. (2000). Case studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 435–454). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Thompson-Whiteside, S. (2011). Understanding academic standards in context of the massification and internationalisation of Australian higher education. Melbourne: University of Melbourne, Centre for the Study of Higher Education.Google Scholar
- Vidovich, L. (2013). Policy research in higher education: Theories and methods for globalising times? In J. Huisman & M. Tight (Eds.), Theory and method in higher education research (international perspectives on higher education research, volume 9) (pp. 21–39). Bingley: Emerald Insight.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2011). Qualitative research from start to finish. New York: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
- Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
- Zajda, J. (2014). Globalisation and neo-liberalism as educational policy in Australia. In D. Turner & H. Yolcu (Eds.), Neoliberal education reforms: A global analysis (pp. 164–183). Hoboken: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar