Abstract
As previously discussed, in order to live and be usable over any period of time, learning objects must be interchangeable across systems. Interchangeability may be the most important factor in how objects are used and especially re-used given the constraints, needs, and policies of the organization or individual who either develops or locates a desired object. What works in a given context is the compelling entry point for many.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bloom, B. S. (1956). Taxonomy of educational objectives, Handbook I: The cognitive domain. New York: David McKay.
Metadata. (2015). Merriam-Webster.com. Retrieved November 10, 2015, from http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/metadata.
Or-Bach, R., & Lavy, I. (2004). Cognitive activities of abstraction in object orientation: An empirical study. SIGCSE Bulletin, 36(2), 82–86.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Frantiska, J.J. (2016). Interchangeability. In: Creating Reusable Learning Objects. SpringerBriefs in Educational Communications and Technology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32889-8_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32889-8_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32888-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32889-8
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)