Skip to main content

Designing an Online Learning and Peer Feedback Platform for GRE Writing Test Preparation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Current Developments in Web Based Learning (ICWL 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 9584))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, an online platform for learning GRE writing and providing peer feedback is designed. The platform consists of 4 modules: the first module helps the users to get familiar with the rhetorical moves and linguistic features found in the model essays; the second module trains the users to recognise the problems with content and form and prepare the users for peer review; the third module simulates the test environment for the users to practice writing with time constraints; the final module allows the users to review other users’ writing from module 3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ashwell, T.: Patterns of teacher response to student writing in a multiple-draft composition classroom: is content feedback followed by form feedback the best method? J. Second Lang. Writ. 9(3), 227–257 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, D.: L2 writing in the post-process era: Introduction. J. Second Lang. Writ. 12(1), 3–15 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Attali, Y.: Exploring the feedback and revision features of criterion. J. Second Lang. Writ. 14, 191–205 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • Attali, Y., Burstein, J.: Automated essay scoring with e-rater® V. 2. J. Technol. Learn. Assess. 4(3) (2006). http://napoleon.bc.edu/ojs/index.php/jtla/article/view/1650

  • Aydin, S.: EFL writers’ perceptions of portfolio keeping. Assessing Writ. 15(3), 194–203 (2010). doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.08.001

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Brett, P.: A genre analysis of the results section of sociology articles. Engl. Specif. Purp. 13(1), 47–59 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, I.: Results sections in sociology and organic chemistry articles: a genre analysis. Engl. Specif. Purp. 28(2), 105–124 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Futagi, Y., Deane, P., Chodorow, M., Tetreault, J.: A computational approach to detecting collocation errors in the writing of non-native speakers of English. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 21(4), 353–367 (2008). doi:10.1080/09588220802343561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golonka, E. M., Bowles, A. R., Frank, V. M., Richardson, D. L., Freynik, S.: Technologies for foreign language learning: a review of technology types and their effectiveness. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 27(1), 70–105 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirano, E.: Research article introductions in English for specific purposes: a comparison between Brazilian Portuguese and English. Engl. Specif. Purp. 28(4), 240–250 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, A., Dudley-Evans, T.: A genre-based investigation of the discussion sections in articles and dissertations. Engl. Specif. Purp. 7(2), 113–121 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, J.M.H.: Method sections of management research articles: a pedagogically motivated qualitative study. Engl. Specif. Purp. 25(3), 282–309 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monaghan, W., Bridgeman, B.: e-rater as a Quality Control on Human Scores (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulus, T.M.: The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing. J. Second Lang. Writ. 8(3), 265–289 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Peacock, M.: Communicative moves in the discussion section of research articles. System 30(4), 479–497 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powers, D.E., Burstein, J.C., Chodorow, M., Fowles, M.E., Kukich, K.: Stumping e-rater: challenging the validity of automated essay scoring. Comput. Human Behav. 18(2), 103–134 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shei, C.-C., Pain, H.: An ESL writer’s collocational aid. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 13(2), 167–182 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swales, J.: Genre Analysis: English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., Badger, R., Yu, Z.: A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class. J. Second Lang. Writ. 15(3), 179–200 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y.-F.: Transforming and constructing academic knowledge through online peer feedback in summary writing. Comput. Assist. Lang. Learn. 29, 1–20 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Simon Ho Wang .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wang, S.H. (2016). Designing an Online Learning and Peer Feedback Platform for GRE Writing Test Preparation. In: Gong, Z., Chiu, D., Zou, D. (eds) Current Developments in Web Based Learning. ICWL 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9584. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32865-2_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32865-2_17

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32864-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32865-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics