Skip to main content

Forecasting with VAR Models

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 142k Accesses

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

Abstract

The discussion of forecasting with VAR models proceeds in two steps. First, we assume that the parameters of the model are known. Although this assumption is unrealistic, it will nevertheless allow us to introduce and analyze important concepts and ideas. In a second step, we then investigate how the results established in the first step have to be amended if the parameters are estimated. The analysis will focus on stationary and causal VAR(1) processes. Processes of higher order can be accommodated by rewriting them in companion form.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    If the mean is non-zero, a constant A 0 must be added to the forecast function.

  2. 2.

    A stationary stochastic process is called deterministic if it can be perfectly forecasted from its infinite past. It is called purely non-deterministic if there is no deterministic component (see Sect. 3.2).

  3. 3.

    Thus, \(\Delta \log P_{t}\) equals the inflation rate.

  4. 4.

    Although the unit root test indicate that R t is integrated of order one, we do not difference this variable. This specification will not affect the consistency of the estimates nor the choice of the lag-length (Sims et al. 1990), but has the advantage that each component of X t is expressed in percentage points which facilitates the interpretation.

  5. 5.

    Such tests would include an analysis of the autocorrelation properties of the residuals and tests of structural breaks.

  6. 6.

    Alternatively one could use the mean-absolute-percentage-error (MAPE). However, as all variables are already in percentages, the MAE is to be preferred.

References

  • Akaike H (1969) Fitting autoregressive models for prediction. Ann Inst Stat Math 21:243–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bai J, Lumsdaine RL, Stock JH (1998) Testing for and dating common breaks in multivariate time series. Rev Econ Stud 65:395–432

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banbura M, Giannone D, Reichlin L (2010) Large Bayesian vector autoregressions. J Appl Econ 25:71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhansali RJ (1999) Parameter estimation and model selection for multistep prediction of a time series: A review. In: Gosh S (ed) Asymptotics, Nonparametrics, and Time Series. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 201–225

    Google Scholar 

  • Christoffersen PF (1998) Evaluating interval forecasts. Int Econ Rev 39:841–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements MP, Hendry DF (1996) Intercept corrections and structural change. J Appl Econ 11:475–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clements MP, Hendry DF (2006) Forecasting with breaks. In: Handbook of economic forecasting, vol 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 605–657

    Google Scholar 

  • Corradi V, Swanson NR (2006) Predictive density evaluation. In: Handbook of economic forecasting, vol 1, Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 197–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold FX, Gunther TA, Tay AS (1998) Evaluating density forecasts, with applications to financial risk management. Int Econ Rev 39:863–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doan T, Litterman RB, Sims CA (1984) Forecasting and conditional projection using realistic prior distributions. Econ Rev 3:1–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dufour JM (1985) Unbiasedness of predictions from estimated autoregressions. Econ Theory 1:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunst R, Neusser K (1986) A forecasting comparison of some var techniques. Int J Forecast 2:447–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litterman RB (1986) Forecasting with Bayesian vector autoregressions: Five years of experience. J Bus Econ Stat 4:25–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Lütkepohl H (2006) New introduction to multiple time series analysis. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcellino M, Stock JH, Watson MW (2006) A comparison of direct and iterated multistep AR methods for forecasting macroeconomic time series. J Econ 135:499–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perron P (2006) Dealing with structural breaks. In: Hassani H, Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook in econometrics, vol 1. Econometric theory. Palgrave Macmillan, Hampshire, pp 278–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinsel GC (1993) Elements of multivariate time series analysis. Springer Series in statistics. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schorfheide F (2005) VAR forecasting under misspecification. J Econ 128:99–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims CA, Stock JH, Watson MW (1990) Inference in linear time series with some unit roots. Econometrica 58:113–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tay AS, Wallis KF (2000) Density forecasting: A Survey. J Forecast 19:235–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Neusser, K. (2016). Forecasting with VAR Models. In: Time Series Econometrics. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32862-1_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics