Abstract
While the fact that, despite their strained relations, India and Pakistan managed to negotiate the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) has been widely celebrated as a success, tensions concerning how to share the water resources of the Indus are rising again. The apparent mismatch between analysis and reality is due to the fact that, so far, most scholars have asked the wrong questions when it comes to water security, international law, and the obligation to cooperate. This chapter will introduce a contemporary understanding of water security which goes beyond the narrow state-centered zero-sum game debate and provides a platform for various disciplines to engage in strengthening cooperation over shared waters. This novel lens will then be applied to analyze the legal framework governing the utilization of the Indus. Can the concept of common concern for water security actually be implemented through the IWT? In marrying security studies with international law, potential futures for the legal framework governing the Indus will be illustrated. It is hoped that this chapter will shine a new light on the question whether the IWT is up to the task of providing water security by building a more resilient future for the basin and whether international law has a role to play in bringing about Industan.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abseno MM (2013) The influence of the UN Watercourses Convention on the development of a treaty regime in the Nile river basin. Water Int 38(2):192–203. doi:10.1080/02508060.2013.782798
Allan T (2002) The Middle East water question: hydropolitics and the global economy. I.B. Tauris, London/New York
AQUASTAT of FAO (2011) Indus river basin. http://www.fao.org/nr/water/aquastat/basins/indus/index.stm
Asian Development Bank (2013) Asian water development outlook 2013: measuring water security in Asia and the Pacific. Asian Development Bank, Manila
Bagla P (2010) Along the Indus river, saber rattling over water security. Science 328(5983):1226–1227
Barnaby W (2009) Do nations go to war over water? Nature 458(7236):282–283
Berkoff J (2003) China: the South-North water transfer project: is it justified? Water Policy 5(1):1–28
Bhatnagar M (2009) Reconsidering the Indus waters treaty. Tulane Environ Law J 22(2):271–314
Birnie P, Boyle A, Redgwell C (2009) International law and the environment, 3rd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Biswas AK (1992) Indus Water Treaty: the negotiating process. Water Int 17(4):201–209
Bjorge E (2014) The evolutionary interpretation of treaties. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Brennan JF (2008) The China-India-Pakistan water crisis: prospects for interstate conflict. Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey
Brock H (2011) Competition over resources: drivers of insecurity and the Global South. Oxford Research Group, London
Brunnée J (2007) Common areas, common heritage, and common concern. In: Bodansky D, Brunnée J, Hey E (eds) The Oxford handbook of international environmental law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 550–573
Brunnée J, Toope SJ (1994) Environmental security and freshwater resources: a case for international ecosystem law. Yearb Int Environ Law 5:41–76
Buzan B (1991) People, states and fear: an agenda for international security studies in the post-cold war era, 2nd edn. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London
Center for Policy and Human Development (2011) Afghanistan human development report 2011. The forgotten front: water security and the crisis in the sanitation. Center for Policy and Human Development, Kabul
Chellaney B (2011) Water: Asia’s new battleground. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC
Delbrück J (2012) The international obligation to cooperate: an empty shell or a hard law principle of international law? A critical look at a much debated paradigm of modern international law. In: Hestermeyer HP, König D, Matz-Lück N, Röben V, Seibert-Fohr A, Stoll T-P et al (eds) Coexistence, cooperation and solidarity, vol 1. Martinus Nijhoff Publishers, Leiden, pp 3–16
Dimitrov RS (2010) Inside UN climate change negotiations: the Copenhagen conference. Rev Pol Res 27(6):795–821. doi:10.1111/j.1541-1338.2010.00472.x
Expert determination on points of difference referred by the Government of Pakistan under the provisions of the Indus Water Treaty, Executive Summary (12 February 2007). Available at http://siteresources.worldbank.org/SOUTHASIAEXT/Resources/223546–1171996340255/BagliharSummary.pdf
Forslund A, Malm-Renöfält B, Barchiesi S, Cross K, Davidson S, Farrell T et al. (2009) Securing water for ecosystems and human well-being: the importance of environmental flows. Swedish Water House Report, 24
Fröhlich CJ (2012) Security and discourse: the Israeli-Palestinian water conflict. Confl Secur Dev 12(2):123–148. doi:10.1080/14678802.2012.688290
Gleditsch NP (1998) Armed conflict and the environment: a critique of the literature. J Peace Res 35(3):381–400
Goldenman G (1990) Adapting to climate change: a study of international rivers and their legal arrangements. Ecol Law Q 17(4):741–802
Grey D, Connors G (2009) The water security imperative: we must and can do more. 5th World Water Forum Istanbul 2009. World Water Council, Istanbul, pp 58–62
Guruswamy LD (1999) The convention on biological diversity: exposing the flawed foundations. Environ Conserv 26(2):79–82
Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248
Hollis DB (2014) The existential function of interpretation in international law. In: Bianchi A, Peat D, Windsor M (eds) Interpretation in international law. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 78–110
Homer-Dixon TF (1994) Environmental scarcities and violent conflict: evidence from cases. Int Secur 19(1):5–40
ICJ (1997) Case Concerning the Gabčíkovo-Nagymaros Project (Hungary v. Slovakia) General List no. 92. Reprinted in 37 ILM 162 (1998)
International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (2001) The MOX plant case (Ireland v. United Kingdom). Found at: <http://www.itlos.org/fileadmin/itlos/documents/cases/case_no_10/Order.03.12.01.E.pdf>
IUCN Commission on Environmental Law, & International Council of Environmental Law (2010) Draft international covenant on environment and development, 4th edn. IUCN, Gland
Khalid ARM (2004) The interlinking of rivers project in India and international water law: an overview. Chin J Int Law 3(2):553–570
Kumar S (2013) The Indus waters Kishenganga arbitration (Pakistan v. India). ASIL Insights 17(13):1–8
Loures FR, Rieu-Clarke A (eds) (2013) The UN watercourses convention in force: strengthening international law for transboundary water management. Earthscan, London
Magsig B-O (2009) Introducing an analytical framework for water security: a platform for the refinement of international water law. J Water Law 20(2/3):61–69
Magsig B-O (2014) Pushing the boundaries: rethinking international law in light of the common concern for water security. In: Sancin V, Kovič Dine M (eds) International environmental law: contemporary concerns and challenges in 2014. GZ Založba, Ljubljana, pp 441–452
Magsig B-O (2015a) International water law and the quest for common security. Routledge, London
Magsig B-O (2015b) Water security in Himalayan Asia: first stirrings of regional cooperation? Water Int 40(2):342–353
Mandhanda N for Time Magazine (2012) Water wars: why India and Pakistan are squaring off over their rivers. http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2111601,00.html. 16 April 2012
McCaffrey SC (2003) The need for flexibility in freshwater treaty regimes. Nat Res Forum 27(2):156–162
McKinney DC (2011) Transboundary water challenges: case studies. Center for Research in Water Resources, University of Texas, Austin
Moynihan R, Magsig B-O (2014) The rising role of regional approaches in international water law: lessons from the UNECE water regime and Himalayan Asia for strengthening transboundary water cooperation. Rev Eur Commun Int Environ Law 23(1):43–58
Orakhelashvili A (2011) Collective security. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Permanent Court of Arbitration (2013) Final award in the matter of the Indus waters Kishenganga arbitration (Pakistan v. India). http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=2471. 20 December 2013
Permanent Court of Arbitration (2011) Order on interim measures in the matter of the Indus waters Kishenganga arbitration (Pakistan v. India). http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=1726. 23 September 2011
Permanent Court of Arbitration (2013). Partial award in the matter of the Indus waters Kishenganga arbitration (Pakistan v. India). http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id=2101. 18 February 2013
Perrez FX (2000) Cooperative sovereignty: from independence to interdependence in the structure of international environmental law. Kluwer Law International, The Hague/Boston
Rieu-Clarke A, Gooch G (2010) Governing the tributaries of the Mekong: the contribution of international law and institutions to enhancing equitable cooperation over the Sesan. Pac McGeorge Glob Bus Dev Law J 22(2):193–224
Rieu-Clarke A, Moynihan R, Magsig B-O (2012) UN watercourses convention: user’s guide. IHP-HELP Centre for Water Law, Policy and Science, Dundee
Salman SMA (2006) International water disputes: a new breed of claims, claimants, and settlement institutions. Water Int 31(1):2–11
Salman SMA (2008) The Baglihar difference and its resolution process: a triumph for the Indus Waters Treaty? Water Policy 10(2):105–117
Sands P, Peel J (2012) Principles of international environmental law, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Schaffer TC (2007) Putting the Kashmiris into the Kashmir issue. Asia Pol 3:192–195
Schmeier S (2013) Governing international watercourses: river basin organizations and the sustainable governance of internationally shared rivers and lakes. Routledge, New York
Scholtz W (2009) Collective (environmental) security: the yeast for the refinement of international law. Yearb Int Environ Law 19:135–162
Schreuer C (2002) State sovereignty and the duty to cooperate – two incompatible notions? In: Delbrück J (ed) International law of cooperation and state sovereignty: proceedings of an international symposium of the Kiel Walther Schücking-Institute of International Law, May 23–26, 2001. Duncker & Humblot, Berlin, pp 163–180
Schuster-Wallace CJ, Grover VI, Adeel Z, Confalonieri U, Elliott S (2008) Safe water as the key to global health. United Nations University, International Network on Water, Environment and Health, Hamilton
Sinha UK (2010a) 50 years of the Indus Water Treaty: an evaluation. Strateg Anal 34(5):667–670
Sinha UK (2010b) Water a pre-eminent political issue between India and Pakistan. Strateg Anal 34(4):482–485
Sinha UK, Gupta A, Behuria A (2012) Will the Indus Water Treaty survive? Strateg Anal 36(5):735–752. doi:10.1080/09700161.2012.712376
Taenzler D, Ruettinger L, Ziegenhagen K, Murthy G (2011) Water, crisis and climate change in India: a policy brief. Adelphi, Berlin
Tellis AJ, Mirski S (eds) (2013) Crux of Asia: China, India, and the emerging global order. Carnegie Endowment, Washington, DC
Timoshenko AS (1992) Ecological security: response to global challenges. In: Weiss EB (ed) Environmental change and international law: new challenges and dimensions. United Nations University Press, Tokyo, pp 413–458
Treaty between India and Pakistan Regarding the Use of the Waters of the Indus (19 September 1960; entered into force 1 April 1960) 419 UNTS 125 (1960)
UN General Assembly, Declaration of Principles of International Law Concerning Friendly Relations and Co-operation Among States in Accordance with the Charter of the United Nations (UNGA Resolution A/RES/2625(XXV), 24 October 1970)
United Nations (1945) Charter of the United Nations (San Francisco, 26 June 1945; in force 24 October 1945)
United Nations (1997) Convention on the Law of the non-navigational uses of international watercourses (New York, 21 May 1997; in force 17 August 2014)
United Nations (2004) A more secure world: our shared responsibility – report of the secretary-general’s high-level panel on threats, challenges and change. United Nations, New York
Uprety K (2015) The Kishenganga arbitration: reviving the Indus Treaty and managing transboundary hydropolitics. [Article]. Chin J Int Law 14(3):497–543. doi:10.1093/chinesejil/jmv029
Villiger ME (2011) The rules on interpretation: misgivings, misunderstandings, miscarriage? The ‘crucible’ intended by the International Law Commission. In: Cannizzaro E (ed) The law of treaties beyond the Vienna Convention. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 105–122
Voigt C (2009) Sustainable security. Yearb Int Environ Law 19:163–196
von Tigerstrom B (2007) Human security and international law. Hart Publishing, Oxford
Weinthal E, Zawahri N, Sowers J (2015) Securitizing water, climate, and migration in Israel, Jordan, and Syria. Int Environ Agreements: Polit Law Econ 15(3):293–307. doi:10.1007/s10784-015-9279-4
Wirsing RG, Stoll DC, Jasparro C (2013) International conflict over water resources in Himalayan Asia. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
Wolpert S (2010) India and Pakistan: continued conflict or cooperation? University of California Press, Berkeley
Wouters P, Chen H (2013) China’s ‘soft-path’ to transboundary water cooperation examined in the light of two UN global water conventions – exploring the ‘Chinese way’. J Water Law 22(2/3):229–247
Wouters P, Moynihan R (2013) Benefit sharing in the UN Watercourses Convention and under international water law. In: Loures FR, Rieu-Clarke A (eds) The UN Watercourses Convention in force: strengthening international law for transboundary water management. Earthscan, London, pp 321–335
Wouters P, Vinogradov S, Allan A, Jones P, Rieu-Clarke A (2005) Sharing transboundary waters: an integrated assessment of equitable entitlement: the legal assessment model, vol 74, IHP-VI technical documents in hydrology. UNESCO, Paris
Wouters P, Vinogradov S, Magsig B-O (2009) Water security, hydrosolidarity and international law: a river runs through it …. Yearb Int Environ Law 19(1):97–134
Zhang Y, Block P, Hammond M, King A (2015) Ethiopia’s Grand Renaissance Dam: implications for downstream riparian countries. J Water Resour Plan Manag 141(9):05015002_05015001–05015002_05015010, doi:10.1061/(ASCE)WR.1943-5452.0000520
Ziganshina D (2014) Promoting transboundary water security in the Aral Sea basin through international law (International Water Law). Brill Nijhoff, Leiden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Magsig, BO. (2017). The Indus Waters Treaty: Modernizing the Normative Pillars to Build a More Resilient Future. In: Adeel, Z., Wirsing, R. (eds) Imagining Industan. Water Security in a New World. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32845-4_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32845-4_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32843-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32845-4
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)