Advertisement

Conclusion

  • Robert G. Wirsing
  • Zafar AdeelEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Water Security in a New World book series (WSEC)

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the contributing authors’ main findings about water insecurity in the Indus basin. Recalling the reasons offered in Chap.  1 for the importance of the Indus basin to the world, it also includes the editors’ reflections on the world’s importance to the basin. By “the world” is meant those foreign powers that have had a serious and sustained strategic relationship with one or more of the basin’s four riparian states, as well as the array of governmental and nongovernmental international and regional organizations and institutions that also have lengthy records of interaction with the countries sharing the basin. It also means the world order – the set of institutional arrangements, rules, and norms established internationally to promote stability, changes in which, in this highly interconnected and politically turbulent world, seem certain to impact upon water security in the countries sharing the Indus basin.

Keywords

Integrated river basin management Indus basin in the world order Water resource cooperation 

References

  1. Arbitral Tribunal of the Permanent Court of Arbitration (2015) In the matter of the bay of Bengal Maritime Boundary Arbitration (the People’s Republic of Bangladesh and the Republic of India), 7 Jul 2014, at: http://www.pca-cpa.org/showfile.asp?fil_id. Retrieved 27 Apr 2015
  2. Coker C (2015) The improbable war: China, the United States & the logic of great power conflict. Hurst & Company, London, p 181Google Scholar
  3. Fair CC, Ganguly S (2015) An unworthy ally: time for Washington to cut Pakistan loose. Foreign Aff 94(5):160–170Google Scholar
  4. Goldberg J, Ambinder M (2011) The Ally from Hell. The Atlantic, at: http://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/print/2011/12/the-ally-from-hell/8730/. Retrieved 3 Oct 2015
  5. International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS), Case No. 16, Dispute Concerning Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal, 14 March 2012, at: http://www.itlos.org. Retrieved 27 Apr 2015
  6. Kaplan R (2001) The coming anarchy: shattering the dreams of the post cold war. Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  7. Lieven A (2012) Pakistan: a hard country. Public Affairs, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Nye JS Jr (2015) Is the American century over? Polity, BostonGoogle Scholar
  9. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Decision on India’s Request for Clarification or Interpretation in the Matter of the Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration, 20 December 2013, at: http://www.pca-cpa.org/PK-IN%20Decision%20on%2. Retrieved 8 Oct 2015
  10. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Final Award in the Matter of the Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration, 20 December 2013, at: http://www.pca-cpa.org/PK-IN%20Final%20Award,%2. Retrieved 8 Oct 2015
  11. Permanent Court of Arbitration, Partial Award in the Matter of the Indus Waters Kishenganga Arbitration, 18 February 2013, at: http://www.pca-cpa.org/PK-IN%2020130218%20Partie. Retrieved 8 Oct 2015
  12. Riesenberg DP (2012) Introductory Note to the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea Delimitation of the Maritime Boundary between Bangladesh and Myanmar in the Bay of Bengal (Bangladesh/Myanmar), at: http://www.jstor.org/discover/10.5305/intelegamate.5. Retrieved 27 Apr 2015
  13. Roughton D et al (2015) UNCLOS Annex VII Tribunal Decides Bangladesh-India Maritime Boundary Dispute at: http://www.hsfnotes.com/arbitration/2014/07/15/unclos-annex-vii-tribunal-decides-bangladesh-india-maritime-boundary-dispute. Retrieved 27 Apr 2015
  14. Salman SMA (2007) The United Nations watercourses convention ten years later: why has its entry into force proven difficult? Water Int 32(1):1–15, http://www.unwatercoursesconvention.org/images/2t, Retrieved 7 Oct 2015CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Salman SMA (2015) Entry into force of the UN watercourses convention: why should it matter? Int J Water Resour Dev 31(1):4–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Schroeder-Wildberg, E (2002) The 1997 International Watercourses Convention – Background and Negotiations, Working Paper on Management in Environmental Planning Number 004, at: http://www.landschaftsoekonomie.tu-berlin. Retrieved 7 Oct 2015
  17. Schweller, R L (2014) Maxwell’s Demon and the Golden Apple: Global Discord in the New Millenium. Johns Hopkins University Press, BaltimoreGoogle Scholar
  18. Shambaugh D (2014) China goes global: the partial power. Oxford University Press, Cambridge, p 6Google Scholar
  19. Upadhyay A, Chatterjee T (Forthcoming, Dec 2015) The Kishenganga hydro-electric project arbitration dispute – partial award (Pakistan v. India): an analysis. Indian J Arbitr Law III(2), at: http://ijal.in/sites/default/files/Tamojit.pdf. Retrieved 8 Oct 2015
  20. Zeihan P (2014) The accidental superpower: the next generation of American preeminence and the coming global disorder. Twelve Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  21. Zeitoun M, Warner J (2006) Hydro-hegemony: a framework for analysis of trans-boundary water conflicts. Water Policy 8(5):435–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Formerly, Georgetown University School of Foreign Service in QatarDohaQatar
  2. 2.United Nations University, Institute for Water, Environment and HealthHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations