Skip to main content

DGS Deviations Using Angle Beam Probes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Defect Sizing Using Non-destructive Ultrasonic Testing

Abstract

Oversizing occurs using the DGS method with traditional angle beam probes. Most angle beam probes have rectangular transducers. In order to find an explanation of the deviations, the sound fields of straight beam probes with circular and rectangular transducers are analyzed and compared. Straight beam probes with circular transducers generate a rotationally symmetric sound field. Due to the effects at the interface between the probe wedge and the test piece, the generated sound field is far from rotationally symmetry-independent on whether a circular or a rectangular transducer is used in angle beam probes. Using the same DGS diagram for sizing with these different sound fields does not look promising. The observed issue of the deviations is not an issue from a single probe manufacturer, but a common problem with traditional angle beam probes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Krautkramer, J., Krautkramer, H.: Ultrasonic Testing of Materials. 4th Fully Revised Edition Translation of the 5th Revised German Edition, Springer, Berlin (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Krautkrämer J.: Fehlergrössenermittlung mit Ultraschall, Arch. Eisenhüttenwesen 30 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Kleinert W., Oberdörfer Y., Splitt G.: The Ideal Angle Beam Probe for DGS Evaluation, 10th ECNDT, Moskau (2010). http://www.ndt.net/article/ecndt2010/reports/1_03_64.pdf

  4. Yan X., Zhang J., Kass D., Langlois P.: DGS Sizing Diagram with Single Element and Phased Array Angle Beam Probe, Olympus, Waltham, MA, ndt.net (2010). http://www.ndt.net/article/ndtnet/2010/14_Yan.pdf

  5. Kleinert, W., Oberdörfer, Y.: Calculated Bandwidth Dependent DGS and DAC Curves for Phased Array Sizing. In: Proceedings of ECNDT Prag (2014). http://www.ndt.net/events/ECNDT2014/app/content/Paper/165_Kleinert.pdf

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolf Kleinert .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kleinert, W. (2016). DGS Deviations Using Angle Beam Probes. In: Defect Sizing Using Non-destructive Ultrasonic Testing. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32836-2_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics