Abstract
A contrast between the ascriptive and consensual models of citizenship allows for an interesting parallel between national citizenship and civil marriage as state institutions. First, ascriptive citizenship is based on birth or some immutable characteristic, while consensual citizenship is in varying degrees rooted in both the prospective member of the community and also the community itself. Second, although consensual citizenship is typically regarded as more compatible with liberal democratic values, I show that in marriage as in citizenship, the consensual model may facilitate exclusion as much as inclusion. Third, I examine the interface between the views of both enthusiasts and skeptics about same-sex marriage and relate these to conceptions of citizenship. Finally, because many still seek the formal statuses of national citizenship or civil marriage, greater attention to the ascriptive model will promote greater inclusiveness in a context of increasing diversity.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ambach v. Norwick. 1979. 441 U.S. 68.
Blankenhorn, David. 2007. The future of marriage. New York: Encounter Books.
Carens, Joseph H. 1987. Who belongs? Theoretical and legal questions about birthright citizenship. University of Toronto Law Review 37(4): 413–443.
Carens, Joseph H. 2013. The ethics of immigration. New York: Oxford University Press.
Chait, Jonathan. 2009. Miss guided. New Republic, June 17, 2.
Cherlin, Andrew J. 2009. The marriage go-round: The state of marriage and the family in America today. New York: Knopf.
Coontz, Stephanie. 2005. Marriage, a history: From obedience to intimacy, or how love conquered marriage. New York: Viking Penguin.
Cott, Nancy. 2000. Public vows. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Gallagher, Maggie. 2003. Normal marriage: Two views. In Marriage and same-sex unions: A debate, ed. Lynn D. Wardle, Mark Strasser, William C. Duncan, and David Orgon Coolidge, 13–24. Westport: Praeger.
Gerstmann, Evan. 2008. Same-sex marriage and the Constitution, 2nd ed. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jacobson, Robin. 2006. Characterizing consent: Race, citizenship, and the new restrictionists. Political Research Quarterly 59(4): 645–654.
Jakobsen, Janet R., and Ann Pellegrini. 2004. Love the sin: Sexual regulation and the limits of religious tolerance. Boston: Beacon.
Josephson, Jyl. 2005. Citizenship, same-sex marriage, and feminist critiques of marriage. Perspectives on Politics 3(2): 269–284.
Lehr, Valerie. 1999. Queer family values; Debunking the myth of the nuclear family. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
Metz, Tamara. 2010. Untying the knot: Marriage, the state, and the case for their divorce. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Obergefell v. Hodges. (576 U.S.___).
Plyler v. Doe. 1982. 457 U.S. 202.
Polikoff, Nancy D. 2008. Beyond (straight and gay) marriage: Valuing all families under the law. Boston: Beacon.
Rauch, Jonathan. 2005. Gay marriage: Why it is good for gays, good for straights, and good for America. New York: Owl Books.
Romer v. Evans. 1996. 517 U.S. 620.
Schuck, Peter H., and Rogers M. Smith. 1985. Citizenship without consent: Illegal aliens in the American polity. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Semple, Kirk. 2013. Making choice to halt at door of citizenship. New York Times, August 26, A1, A26.
Smith, Rogers M. 1997. Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven/London: Yale University Press.
Smith, Rogers M. 2009. Beyond sovereignty and uniformity: The challenges for equal citizenship in the twenty-first century. Harvard Law Review 122(3): 907–936.
Snyder, Claire. 2006. Gay marriage and democracy: Equality for all. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield.
Spiro, Peter J. 2008. Beyond citizenship: American identity after globalization. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sullivan, Andrew. 1996. Virtually normal: An argument about homosexuality. New York: Vintage.
Sullivan, Andrew. 2001. Unveiled. New Republic, August 13, 7.
Tamir, Yael. 1993. Liberal nationalism. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Walzer, Michael. 1983. Spheres of justice: A defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
Whitehead, Jaye Cee. 2012. The nuptial deal: Same-sex marriage and neo-liberal governance. Chicago/London: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gill, E.R. (2016). National Citizenship and Civil Marriage: Ascriptive and Consensual Models. In: Cudd, A., Lee, Wc. (eds) Citizenship and Immigration - Borders, Migration and Political Membership in a Global Age. AMINTAPHIL: The Philosophical Foundations of Law and Justice, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32786-0_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32786-0_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32785-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32786-0
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)