Skip to main content

Supporting the Process of the Most Preferred Variant Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1191 Accesses

Part of the book series: International Series in Operations Research & Management Science ((ISOR,volume 242))

Abstract

Several police divisions rushed here and there, searched the grounds, every bush, every weed, and both x-rays and laboratory samples were diligently taken of everything imaginable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Electronic supplementary material The online version of this chapter (doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-32756-3_8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

  2. 2.

    This statement is a slight simplification, in each case one should rather speak of a class of methods which differ in formal and technical details. However, here we do not elaborate on this.

  3. 3.

    See Prospect Theory by David Kahneman and Amos Tversky; David Kahneman, the American psychologist, the Nobel Price laureate in 2002; Amos Tversky, the American psychologist.

References

  1. Ehrgott, M., 2005. Multicriteria optimization. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Kaliszewski, I., 1994. Quantitative Pareto Analysis by Cone Separation Technique. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  3. Kaliszewski, I., 2006. Soft computing for complex multiple criteria decision making problems. Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Köksalan, M., Wallenius, J., Zionts S., 2011. Multiple Criteria Decision Making From Early History to the 21st Century. World Scientific.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  5. Miettinen, K.M., 1999. Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Wierzbicki, A.P., (1999), Reference point approaches. In: Multicriteria Decision Making – Advances in MCDM: Models, Algorithms, Theory and Applications. Gal T., Stewart Th., Hanne Th. (Eds.) Kluwer Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Yu, P.L., Leitman, G., 1974. Compromise solutions, domination structures and Salukvadze’s solution. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 14, 362–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

8.1 Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Kaliszewski, I., Miroforidis, J., Podkopaev, D. (2016). Supporting the Process of the Most Preferred Variant Selection. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Making by Multiobjective Optimization. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 242. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32756-3_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics