Abstract
Pro-Ana are websites that are designed to promote and support Anorexia Nervosa (AN) and other eating disorders. Common features of these websites include forums and chat rooms, tips and tricks, ‘thinspirations’, as well as links to other Pro-Anorexia websites. One of the most common and disconcerting aspects of these websites is the detailed instructions for initiating and maintaining the illness, AN. Pro-Ana members join a special target-based virtual community in order to encourage one another in losing weight and creating a social environment that does not denounce self-starvation, but rather support and strengthens the disordered behavior. The aim of this chapter is to try to identify the characteristics of the Pro-Ana community, to understand the motivations underlining the engagement in these websites and accordingly to suggest clinical and research implications for therapists and researchers.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Hsu LKG. Eating disorders. New York: Gilford Press; 1990.
Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P, Quinn CE, Zoino J. The mass marketing of disordered eating and eating disorders: The social psychology of women, thinness and culture. Women’s Studies International Forum. 2006;29:208–24.
Hesse-Biber SN. The cult of thinness. New York: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Latzer Y. Eating disorders. Jerusalem: Sold Institute; 1999. (Hebrew).
Agras WS. The consequences and costs of the eating disorders. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2001;24:371–9.
Harrison K. Television viewing, fat stereotyping, body shape standards, and eating disorder symptomatology in grade school children. Communication Research. 2000;27:617–40.
Holmstrom AJ. The effect of the media on body image: a meta-analysis. Journal of Broadcasting and Electronic Media. 2004;48:196–218.
Norris ML, Boydell KM, Pinhas L, Katzman DK. Ana and the Internet: a review of pro-anorexia websites. Int J Eat Disord. 2006;39:443–7.
Fox S. Health Information Online.PEW Internet & American Life Project 2005. Accessed July 9, 2008, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Healthtopics_May05.pdf.
Dias K. The ana sanctuary: Women’s pro-anorexia narratives in cyberspace. Journal of International Women’s Studies. 2003;4:31–45.
Abbate Daģa G, Gramaglia C, Piero A, Fassino S. Eating disorders and the Internet: Cure and curse. Eating & Weight Disorders, 2006; 11:68–71.
Brotsky SR, Giles D. Inside the “Pro-Ana” community: A covert online participant observation. Eating Disorders. 2007;15:93–109.
Barak A. Youth and Internet: The psychology of the ‘as if’ [KE’ILU] and the ‘suchlike’ [KAZE]. Panim, 2006; 37:48–58. (Hebrew).
Steinberg L. Adolescence. Boston: McGraw-Hill; 2008.
Valkenburg PM, Peter J. Preadolescents’ and adolescents’ online communication and their closeness to friends. Dev Psychol. 2007;43:267–77.
Bargh JA, McKenna KYA. The Internet and social life. Annu Rev Psychol. 2004;55:573–90.
Suler J. The psychology of text relashionships. In: Kraus R, Zack J, Stricker G, editors. Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals. San Diego, CA: Elsevier Academic Press; 2004. p. 19–50.
Gavin J, Rodham K, Poyer H. The presentation of “pro-anorexia” in online group interactions. Qual Health Res. 2008;18:325–33.
Chesley EB, Alberts JD, Klein JD, Kreipe RE. Pro or con? Anorexia Nervosa and the Internet. J Adolesc Health. 2003;32:123–4.
Russel J. Treating Anorexia nervosa. British Medical Journal (editorial article). 1995;311:584.
Mulveen R, Hepworth J. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of participation in a pro-anorexia Internet site and its relationship with disordered eating. Journal of Health Psychology. 2006;11:283–96.
Martijn C, Smeets E, Jansen A, Hoeymans N, Schoemaker C. Don’t get the message: the effect of a warning text before visiting a proanorexia website. International Journal of Eating Disorder. 2009;42:139–45.
Shirky C. Here comes everybody: the power of organizing without organizations. New-York: The Penguin Press; 2008. p. 202–8.
Giles D. Constructing identities in cyberspace: the case of eating disorders. Br J Soc Psychol. 2006;45:463–77.
Fox N, Ward K, O’Rourke A. Pro-anorexia, weight loss drugs and the Internet: an ‘anti-recovery’ explanatory model of anorexia. Sociol Health Illn. 2005;27:944–71.
Bardone-Cone AM, Cass KM. Investigating the impact of pro-anorexia websites a pilot study. European Eating Disorders Review. 2006;14:256–62.
Lyons EJ, Mehl MR, Pennebaker JW. Pro-anorexia and recovering anorexics differ in their linguistic Internet self-presentation. J Psychosom Res. 2006;60:253–6.
Tierney S. The dangers and draw of online communication: Pro-anorexia websites and their implications for users, practitioners, and researchers. Eating Disorders. 2006;14:181–90.
Rheingold H. Smart Mobs: the next social revolution. Cambridge: Perseus Publishing; 2002.
Harshbarger JL, Ahlers-Schmidt CR, Mayans L, Mayans D, Hawkins JH. Pro-Anorexia websites: What a clinician should know. International Journal on Eating Disorders. 2009;42:367–70.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Boniel-Nissim, M., Latzer, Y. (2016). The Characteristics of Pro-Ana Community. In: Latzer, Y., Stein, D. (eds) Bio-Psycho-Social Contributions to Understanding Eating Disorders. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32742-6_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32742-6_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32740-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32742-6
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)