Abstract
In this chapter, we report the findings from a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of using virtual manipulatives to improve preschool students’ early mathematics skills. One hundred thirty-two preschool children were randomly assigned to nine sessions of adaptive computerized counting or comparison with virtual manipulatives, or to a typical instruction control group. Children in both experimental intervention groups, including children with poor calculation skills at the start of the intervention, performed better than controls not using virtual manipulatives on early mathematics tasks at the posttest. In addition, the effects of the training held six months later with the counting intervention improving number knowledge and mental arithmetic performance, and the comparison intervention only enhancing the number knowledge proficiency in Grade 1. The effect of virtual manipulatives was present in empathic children, thinkers, persisters, dreamers, rebels and promoters according to the Kahler Process Communication Model. In addition children in both experimental groups became more adventurous after the training. We discuss the value of these short interventions with virtual manipulatives in preschool as a forward-looking approach to enhance arithmetic proficiency.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ampaw, F. D., Gilbert, M. B., & Donlan, R. A. (2013). Verifying the validity and reliability of the personality pattern inventory: Preliminary Results. Expanded paper (originally presented at the 4th international congress on process communication Vienna, Austria August 30, 2012). The Journal of Process Communication, 1(1).
Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., Sajaniemi, N., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2009). Early numeracy in low-performing young children. British Educational Research Journal, 35, 25–46. doi:10.1080/01411920802041822
Aunio, P., Hautamäki, J., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2005). Mathematical thinking intervention programsfor preschool children with normal and low number sense. European Journal of Special needs Education, 20, 131–146. doi:10.1080/08856250500055578
Baker, S., Gersten, R., & Lee, D. (2002). A synthesis of empirical research on teaching mathematics to low-achieving students. The Elementary School Journal, 103, 51–73. doi:10.1086/499715
Baudonck, M., Debusschere, A., Dewulf, B., Samyn, F., Vercaemst, V., & Desoete, A. (2006). Kortrijke Rekentest Revisie (KRT-R) (Kortrijk arithmetic test revision). Kortrijk: Revalidatiecentrum Overleie.
Bloete, A. W., Lieffering, L. M., & Ouwehand, K. (2006). The development of many-to-one counting in 4-year-old children. Cognitive Development, 21, 332–348.
Bradley, D. F., & Pauley, J. F. (2001). Here’s how to reach me: Matching instruction to personalty types in your classroom. Process Communication Nederland Rijnsaterwoude.
Butterworth, B., & Laurillard, D. (2010). Low numeracy and dyscalculia: identification and intervention. ZDM, 42, 527–539.
Codding, R. S., Hilt-Panahon, A., Panahon, C. J., & Benson, J. L. (2009). Addressing mathematics computation problems: A review of simple and moderate intensity interventions. Education and Treatment of Children, 32, 279–312. doi:10.1353/etc.0.0053
Desoete, A. (2014). Cognitive predictors of mathematical abilities and disabilities. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Mathematical Cognition, (pp.899–914). Oxford: Medicine UK.
Desoete, A. (2015). Predictive indicators for mathematical learning disabilities/dyscalculia in preschool children. In S. Chinn (Ed.), The international handbook for mathematical difficulties and dyscalculia (pp. 90–100). London, New York: Routledge.
Desoete, A., & Grégoire, J. (2007). Numerical competence in young children with mathematical learning disabilities. Learning and Individual Differences, 16, 351–367. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016.J.lindif.2006.12.006
Desoete, A., Praet, M., Titeca, D., & Ceulemans, A. (2013). Cognitive phenotype of mathematical learning disabilities: what can we learn from siblings? Research in Developmental Disabilities, 34, 404–412. doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2012.08.022
Desoete, A., Roeyers, H., & De Clercq, A. (2004). Children with mathematics learning disabilities in Belgium. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 50–61. doi:10.1177/00222194040370010601
Dowker, A. (2005). Early identification and intervention for students with mathematical difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 324–332. doi:10.1177/00222194050380040801
Dowker, A. (2015). Individual differences in arithmetical abilities. The componential nature of arithmetic. In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 862–878). Oxford: Medicine UK.
Dyson, N. I., Jordan, N. C., & Glutting, J. (2011). A number sense intervention for low-income kindergartners at risk for math difficulties. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Advance online publication. doi:10.1177/0022219411410233
Gallistel, C. R., & Gellman, R. (1992). Preverbal and verbal counting and computation. Cognition, 44, 43–74. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(92)90050-R
Geary, D. C. (2011a). Cognitive predictors of achievement growth in mathematics: A 5-year longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 47, 1539–1552.
Geary, D. C. (2011b). Consequences, characteristics, and causes of mathematical learning disabilities and persistent low achievement in mathematics. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 32, 250–263.
Gilbert, M. B. (1999). Why educators have problems with some students: Understanding frames of preference. Journal of Educational Administration, 37, 243–256. doi:10.1108/09578239910275481
Gilbert, M. (1996). The process communication model: Understanding ourselves and others. National Association of Secondary School Principals. NASSP Bulletin, 40 (578). doi: 10.1108/17506200710779521
Grégoire, J., Noël, M., & Nieuwenhoven, Van. (2004). TEDI-MATH. Antwerpen: Harcourt.
Hantson, E., Van de Velde, M. C., & Desoete, A. (2015). Persoonlijkheid en (de)motivatie van kinderen en jongeren. Theorie, praktijk en onderzoek van process communication model (Personality and (de)motivation of children and youth. Theory, practice and research on process communication model). Gent: Academia Press.
Haseler, M. (2008). Making intervention in numeracy more effective in schools. In A. Dowker (Ed.), Mathematical difficulties: Psychology and education (pp. 225–241). London, UK: Elsevier.
Heasman, B. (2000). Winning ways with working styles. http://www.dtaweb.co.uk/winning%20ways.pdf
Hendriksen, J., & Hurks, P. (2009) WPPSI-III-NL.| Wechsler Preschool and Primary Scale of Intelligence. Amsterdam: Pearson.
Jordan, N. C., Glutting, J., Dyson, N., Hassinger-Das, B., & Irwin, C. (2012). Building Kindergartner’s number sense: A randomized controlled study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 647–660. doi:10.1037/a002901810.1016/j.jecp.2009.03.009
Jordan, N. C., Kaplan, D., Ramineni, C., & Locuniak, M. N. (2009). Early matters: Preschool number competence and later mathematics outcomes. Developmental, 45, 850–867. doi:10.1037/a0014939
Pauley, J.F. (2013). Journal of Process Communication, 1(1). Retrieved July 2013 http://www.kahlercom.com/wpcontent/uploads/2013/09/PCM-journal-July-issue-2.pdf
Kahler, T. (2004). The process therapy model. Little Rock, AR: Taibi Kahler Associates
Kahler, T. (2008). The process therapy model: The six personality types with adaptations. Little Rock: Taibi Kahler Associates Inc.
Kreyenberg, J. (2003). Analyse of working style and communication by drivers. Zeitung for Transactionsanalyse, Psychology, 1.
Kroesbergen, E. J., & Van Luit, J. E. H. (2003). Mathematics interventions for children with special educational needs. A meta- analysis. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 97–114. doi:10.1177/074193250030240020501
LeFevre, J.-A., Smith-Chant, B. L., Fast, L., Skwarchuk, S.-L., Sargala, E., Arnup, J. S., & Kamawar, D. (2006). What counts as knowing? The development of conceptual and procedural knowledge of counting from preschool through Grade 2. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93, 285–303. doi:10.1016/j.jecp.2005.11.002
McGuire, T., Khaler, T., & Stansbury, P. (1990). Myers briggs/personality pattern inventory. Research January 3, 1990.
Moore, A. M., Rudy, N. O., & Schcrat, M. H. (2015). Affect, motivation, working memory, and mathematics (pp. 918–936). In R. C. Kadosh & A. Dowker (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of mathematical cognition (pp. 917–936). Oxford: Medicine UK.
Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2008). Promoting broad and stable improvements in low-income children’s numerical knowledge through playing number board games. Child Development, 79, 375–394. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.01131.x
Ramani, G. B., & Siegler, R. S. (2011). Reducing the gap in numerical knowledge between low- and middle-income preschoolers. Journal of Applied Developmental Psychology, 32, 146–159. doi:10.1016/j.appdev.2011.02.005
Räsänen, P., Salminen, J., Wilson, A. J., Aunio, P., & Dehaene, S. (2009). Computer-assisted intervention for children with low numeracy skills. Cognitive Development, 24, 450–472. doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.09.003
Shalev, R. S., Manor, O., Kerem, B., Ayali, N., Frielander, Y., & Gross-Tsur, V. (2001). Developmental dyscalculia is a familial learning disability. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34, 59–65.
Slavin, R. E., Lake, C., & Groff, C. (2009). Effective programs in middle and high school mathematics: A best-evidence synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 79, 839–911. doi:10.3102/0034654308330968
Stock, P., Desoete, A., & Roeyers, H. (2010). Detecting children with arithmetic Disabilities from preschool: Evidence from a 3-year longitudinal study on the role of preparatory arithmetic abilities. Journal of learning Disabilities, 43, 250–268. doi:10.1177/0022219409345011
Templeton, T. N., Neel, R. S., & Blood, E. (2008). Meta-analysis of math interventions for students with emotional and behavioral disorders. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 16, 226–239. doi:10.1177/1063426608321691
Van Luit, J. E. H., & Schopman, A. M. (2000). Improving early numeracy of young children with special educational needs. Remedial and Special Education, 21, 27–40. doi:10.1177/074193250002100105
Wechsler, D., Kort, W., Schittekatte, M., Bosmans, M., Compaan, E. L., Dekker, P. H., & Verhaeghe, P. (2002). Wechsler intelligence scale for children-III-Nl. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Harcourt.
Wilson, A. J., & Räsänen, P. (2008). Effective interventions for numeracy difficulties/disorders. Encyclopedia of language and literacy development (pp. 1–11). London, ON: Canadian Language and Literacy research Network. Retrieved from http://www.literacyencyclopedia.ca/pdfs/topic.php?topId=259
Wilson, A. J., Revkin, S. K., Cohen, D., Cohen, L., & Dehaene, S. (2006). An open trial assessment of “The Number Race”, an adaptive computer game for remediation of dyscalculia. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 2, 20. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-2-20
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Desoete, A., Praet, M., Van de Velde, C., De Craene, B., Hantson, E. (2016). Enhancing Mathematical Skills Through Interventions with Virtual Manipulatives. In: Moyer-Packenham, P. (eds) International Perspectives on Teaching and Learning Mathematics with Virtual Manipulatives. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 7. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32718-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32716-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32718-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)