Advertisement

Estimation of the Relationship Between External Biceps Brachii Deformation and Isometric Contraction Level Using Motion Capture Technique

  • Mariam AL HarrachEmail author
  • Sofiane Boudaoud
  • Khalil Ben Mansour
  • Jean-Francois Grosset
  • Frederic Marin
Conference paper
Part of the IFMBE Proceedings book series (IFMBE, volume 57)

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the potential of Motion Capture (MoCap) technique in the extraction of information about Biceps Brachii (BB) surface deformation for the characterization of its activation under isometric conditions. Thus, the dominant BB muscles of five healthy male subjects were tested using high density optic sensors (41 markers) and 18 infrared cameras. For each subject, ultrasound images were taken in order to extract architectural parameters (muscle length, boundaries and position). Afterwards, the 4 mm markers were placed in a lozenge shape by respecting the obtained boundaries. Four contraction levels: 20, 40, 60 and 80% of the Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) were recorded in parallel with the corresponding 3D position of the markers. Fitting procedure in both 2D and 3D was proceeded to extract deformation information. Analysis of the obtained results showed that the curvature of the BB is directly correlated to the level of contraction. Furthermore, parameters obtained from ellipsoid fitting of the 3D dataset, showed monotonic relationship with the muscle contraction level.

Keywords

Motion Capture Ultrasound Biceps Brachii Isometric contraction Deformation estimation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    J. Shi, Y.-P. Zheng, Q.-H. Huang, and X. Chen, “Continuous Monitoring of Sonomyography, Electromyography and Torque Generated by Normal Upper Arm Muscles During Isometric Contraction: Sonomyography Assessment for Arm Muscles,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 55, no. 3, pp. 1191–1198, Mar. 2008.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Y. P. Zheng, M. M. F. Chan, J. Shi, X. Chen, and Q. H. Huang, “Sonomyography: Monitoring morphological changes of forearm muscles in actions with the feasibility for the control of powered prosthesis,” Med. Eng. Phys., vol. 28, no. 5, pp. 405–415, Jun. 2006.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    B. J. van der Linden, H. F. Koopman, H. J. Grootenboer, and P. A. Huijing, “Modelling functional effects of muscle geometry,” J. Electromyogr. Kinesiol. Off. J. Int. Soc. Electrophysiol. Kinesiol., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 101–109, Apr. 1998.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    G. Bleser, D. Steffen, M. Weber, G. Hendeby, D. Stricker, L. Fradet, F. Marin, N. Ville, and F. Carré, “A Personalized Exercise Trainer for the Elderly,” J Ambient Intell Smart Env., vol. 5, no. 6, pp. 547–562, Nov. 2013.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    K. Ben Mansour, F.-R. Sarhan, C. Neiva, C. Godard, B. Devauchelle, F. Marin, and S. Dakpé, “Analysis of mimic facial movements based on motion capture,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., vol. 17, no. sup1, pp. 78–79, Aug. 2014.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    I. Zelman, M. Galun, A. Akselrod-Ballin, Y. Yekutieli, B. Hochner, and T. Flash, “Nearly automatic motion capture system for tracking octopus arm movements in 3D space,” J. Neurosci. Methods, vol. 182, no. 1, pp. 97–109, Aug. 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Edward, S. Dakpe, P. Feissel, B. Devauchelle, and F. Marin, “Quantification of facial movements by motion capture,” Comput. Methods Biomech. Biomed. Engin., vol. 15, no. sup1, pp. 259–260, Sep. 2012.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    S. S. Blemker, P. M. Pinsky, and S. L. Delp, “A 3D model of muscle reveals the causes of nonuniform strains in the biceps brachii,” J. Biomech., vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 657–665, Apr. 2005.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    J. Teran, S. Blemker, V. N. T. Hing, and R. Fedkiw, “Finite Volume Methods for the Simulation of Skeletal Muscle,” in Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGGRAPH/Eurographics Symposium on Computer Animation, Aire-la-Ville, Switzerland, Switzerland, 2003, pp. 68–74.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    L. M. Dario Farina, “A Surface EMG Generation Model With Multilayer Cylindrical Description of the Volume Conductor,” IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng., vol. 51, no. 3, pp. 415–26, 2004.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    S. Allouch, M. Al Harrach, S. Boudaoud, J. Laforet, F. S. Ayachi, and R. Younes, “Muscle force estimation using data fusion from high-density SEMG grid,” 2013, pp. 195–198.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    A. Botter, H. R. Marateb, B. Afsharipour, and R. Merletti, “Solving EMG-force relationship using Particle Swarm Optimization,” Conf. Proc. Annu. Int. Conf. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. IEEE Eng. Med. Biol. Soc. Conf., vol. 2011, pp. 3861–3864, 2011.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    F. S. Ayachi, S. Boudaoud, and C. Marque, “Evaluation of muscle force classification using shape analysis of the sEMG probability density function: a simulation study,” Med. Biol. Eng. Comput., vol. 52, no. 8, pp. 673–684, Aug. 2014.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mariam AL Harrach
    • 1
    Email author
  • Sofiane Boudaoud
    • 1
  • Khalil Ben Mansour
    • 1
  • Jean-Francois Grosset
    • 1
  • Frederic Marin
    • 1
  1. 1.Sorbonne University, Universite de Technologie de Compiègne, CNRS UMR 7338 Biomechanics and Bioengineering, Centre de Recherche de RoyallieuCompiègneFrance

Personalised recommendations