Skip to main content

ERPs-Based Attention Analysis Using Continuous Wavelet Transform: the Bottom-up and Top-down Paradigms

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 97 Accesses

Part of the book series: IFMBE Proceedings ((IFMBE,volume 57))

Abstract

Evoked Related Potentials (ERPs) analysis for distinguishing between bottom-up and top-down attention, using 256-channel EEG signals obtained by measurements on humans, is investigated here. The three main ERPs, i.e., N170, P300, N400 were obtained after appropriate time windows selection for different response peaks and averaging EEG waveforms from all trials for each channel. Following that, Continuous Wavelet Transform (CWT) was applied on each ERP waveform and a vector of six morphological CWT-based features was constructed and fed to two well-known classifiers, i.e., SVM and k-NN. The selected ERPs were drawn from those channels where they are known to be observed more frequently. The experimental results have shown that P300 provides higher classification rates than N170 and N400, reaching a classification accuracy of 76%. Moreover, SVM and k-NN showed similar performance, with the latter being slightly more efficient. Finally, gender factorization of data contributed to a maximum classification accuracy of 80%. The proposed analysis paves the way for better understanding of the activity of the brain in different attention scenarios as reflected in the CWT domain, exploring the time-frequency characteristics of the related ERPs, contributing to the detection of potential attention disorders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Pashler H, Β (1998) The Psychology of Attention. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  2. Corbetta M, Shulman G L (2002) Control of goal-directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 3(3):215–229

    Google Scholar 

  3. Egeth H E, Yantis S (1997) Visual attention: control, representation, and time course. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 48:269–297

    Google Scholar 

  4. Treisman A M, Gelade G (1980) A feature - integration theory of attention Cognitive Psychol. 12:97–136

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bacon W F, Egeth HE (1994) Overriding stimulus-driven attentional capture. Percept. Psychophys. 55:485–496

    Google Scholar 

  6. Fabiani M, Gratton G, Coles M G (2007) Event-Related brain potentials, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  7. Eimer M (2011) The Face-Sensitive N170 Component of the Event-Related Brain Potential, London

    Google Scholar 

  8. Molinaro N, Markus C, Barber, Horacio A and Carreiras M (2009) On the functional nature of the N400: Contrasting effects related to visual word recognition and contextual semantic integration Cogn Neurosci. 1(1):1-7 DOI 10.1080/17588920903373952

    Google Scholar 

  9. Mackworth N H (1948) The breakdown of vigilance during prolonged visual search in the Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology 1:6-21

    Google Scholar 

  10. Herrmann C S, Knight R T (2001) Mechanisms of human attention: event-related potentials and oscillations Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 465-76

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hillyard S A, Anllo-Vento L (1999) Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention, California Psychophysiology

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wykowska A, Schubö A (2010) On the temporal relation of top-down and bottom-up mechanisms during guidance of attention, Cogn Neurosci. 22(4):640-54 DOI 10.1162/jocn.2009.21222

    Google Scholar 

  13. Clark V P, Hillyard S A (1996) Spatial selective attention affects early extrastriate but not striate components of the visual evoked potential, Cogn Neurosci. 8:387–402

    Google Scholar 

  14. Corbetta M, Kincade J M, Ollinger J M, McAvoy M P, Shulman G L (2000) Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex. Nat. Neurosci. 3:292–297

    Google Scholar 

  15. Demiralp T, Ademoglu A, Comerchero M, Polich J (2001) Wavelet Analysis of P3a and P3b. Brain Topogr. 13:251–267

    Google Scholar 

  16. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin. Neurophysiol. 118 2128-2124

    Google Scholar 

  17. Castellanos N P, Makarov V A (2006) Recovering EEG Brain Signals: Artifact Suppression with Wavelet Enhanced Independent Component Analysis, Neuroscience Methods vol.158, no. 2, pp.300-312

    Google Scholar 

  18. Jain S, Wadhwani A K (2012) Analysis of EEG Signals for Epilepsy and Seizure by decomposition with Wavelet Transform International Journal of Engineering and Advanced Technology (IJEAT) 1(4): 2249 – 8958

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johankhani P, Kodogiannis V, Revett K (2006) EEG Signal Classification Using Wavelet Feature Extraction and Neural Networks IEEE JVA06, 2006, pp 120–124

    Google Scholar 

  20. Hmeidi I, Hawashin B, Eyas El-Qawasmeh (2008) Performance of KNN and SVM classifiers on full word Arabic articles Journal Advanced Engineering Informatics archive 22(1):106-111

    Google Scholar 

  21. Prochazka A, Kukal J, Vysata O (2008) Wavelet Transform Use for Feature Extraction and EEG Signal Segments Classification IEEE ISCCSP Proc., Prague, 2008, pp 719-722

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bentin, S, McCarthy G, Perez E, Puce A, Allison T (1996) Electrophysiological studies of face perception in humans Cogn Neurosci. 8:551-565

    Google Scholar 

  23. Samar V J, Bopardikar A, Rao R, Swartz K (1999) Wavelet analysis of neuroelectric waveforms. Brain and Lang. 66(1):7-60

    Google Scholar 

  24. Kalayci T, Ozdamar O, Erdol N (1994) The use of wavelet transform as a preprocessor for the neural network detection of EEG spikes. IEEE Southeastcon ’94 Proc. pp. 1–3

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schiff S J, Heller J, Weinstein S L, Milton J (1994) Wavelet transforms and surrogate data for electroencephalographic spike and seizure detection. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology 91:442–455

    Google Scholar 

  26. Tang Z W, Ishii N (1993) The recognition system with two channels at different resolution for detecting spike in Human’s EEG. IEICE Transactions on Information and Systems, E76-D(3):377–387

    Google Scholar 

  27. Raz J, Dickerson L, Turetsky B (1999) A wavelet packet model of evoked potentials. Brain and Lang. 66(1):61-88

    Google Scholar 

  28. Coles M G H, Rugg M D (1996) Event-related brain potentials: an introduction. Electrophysiology of Mind: Event-related Brain Potentials and Cognition, Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  29. George N, Evans J, Fiori N, Davidoff J, Renault B (1996) Brain events related to normal and moderately scrambled faces. Cogn Brain Res 4(2):65-76

    Google Scholar 

  30. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John E (1965) Evoked potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 150(3700):1187-8

    Google Scholar 

  31. Polich J (2007) Updating P300: An integrative theory of P3a and P3b. Clin Neurophysiol 118(10): 2128-2148

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kutas M, Hillyard S A (1980) Event-related brain potentials to semantically inappropriate and surprisingly large words. Biol. Psychol. 11(2):99–116

    Google Scholar 

  33. Chavan A, Dr. Kolte M, Optimal Mother Wavelet for EEG signal processing, IJAREEIE 2(12):5959-5963

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sahibsingh A, Dudani (1976) The Distance-Weighted k-Nearest-Neighbor Rule IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics SMC-6(4):325-327 DOI 10.1109/TSMC.1976.5408784

    Google Scholar 

  35. M.A. Hearst M A, Dumais S T, Osman E, Platt J, Scholkopf B (1998) Support vector machines IEEE Intelligent Systems and their Applications 13(4):18-28 DOI: 10.1109/5254.708428

    Google Scholar 

  36. Calder A J et al. (2001) The Oxford Handbook of Face Perception. Oxford University Press

    Google Scholar 

  37. Hadjileontiadis L, Kompatsiaris I, Kosmidou V, Tsolaki A (2014) Brain source localization of MMN, P300 and N400: Aging and gender differences. Brain Res. 1603:32-49

    Google Scholar 

  38. Li L, Gratton C, Yao D, Knight R (2010) Role of Frontal and Parietal Cortices in the Control of Bottom-up and Top-down Attention in Humans, Brain Res. 1344:173-84. DOI 10.1016/j.brainres.2010.05.016

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leontios J. Hadjileontiadis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karatzia, A. et al. (2016). ERPs-Based Attention Analysis Using Continuous Wavelet Transform: the Bottom-up and Top-down Paradigms. In: Kyriacou, E., Christofides, S., Pattichis, C. (eds) XIV Mediterranean Conference on Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing 2016. IFMBE Proceedings, vol 57. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32703-7_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32701-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32703-7

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics