Challenging Islamophobia and the Security Discourse: Dialogue and the Muslim Activist

Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)


This chapter focuses on young Muslim women challenging the dominant discourse about Islam and terrorism by engaging in resistance through dialogue. Young Muslims are attempting to take control of the wider narrative about their identities, by raising awareness about Islam and their beliefs. Within the university, Islamic student societies are attempting to ‘normalize’ Muslim student presence by promoting student activism beyond the Islamic society; Pakistani student societies (Paksocs) are also providing an alternative narrative about Pakistan. The chapter further highlights the strategies of dialogue and communication that are being employed at the individual level by young women and men in order to challenge this securitized discourse that limits their expressions of being British, Muslim and Pakistani in contemporary Britain.


Positive Image Muslim Woman Dominant Discourse Student Organization Student Society 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bakhtin, M. (1986) Speech Genres and Other Late Essays. C. Emerson and M. Holquist (eds.), Translated by V.E. McGhee. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  2. Bakhtin, M. (1981) The Dialogic Imagination Four Essays. M. Holquist (ed.), Translated by C. Emerson and M. Holquist. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  3. Bernard-Donals, M.F. (1994) Mikhail Bakhtin Between Phenomenology and Marxism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Brown, E.K. and Saeed, T. (2015) Radicalization and counter-radicalization at British universities: Muslim encounters and alternatives. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 38 (11), pp. 1952–1968.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cowan, G. and Arsenault, A. (2008) Moving from Monologue to Dialogue to Collaboration: The Three Layers of Public Diplomacy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 616, pp. 10–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Flood, G. (1999) Beyond Phenomenology: Rethinking the Study of Religion. Continuum.Google Scholar
  7. Gurevitch, Z.D. (1990) The dialogic connection and the ethics of dialogue, The British Journal of Sociology, 41(2), pp. 181–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Her Majesty’s Government (HM Government). (2006) Terrorism Act 2006. UK: Crown.Google Scholar
  9. Holquist, M. (1990) Dialogism Bakhtin and his World. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Loriggio, F. (1990) The Bakhtin Circle and Pragmatist Psychology. In Mikhail Bakhtin and the Epistemology of Discourse, Critical Studies Vol 2. No. 1/2, ed. C. Thomson, The Netherlands: Rodopi, pp. 91–110.Google Scholar
  11. Milmo, C. (2015, 23/01) ‘British Muslim school children suffering a backlash of abuse following Paris attacks,’ Independent. Available from: (Accessed, 11/15, 2015).
  12. Modood T. and Dobbernack J. (2011) A left communitarianism? What about multiculturalism?, Soundings 48, pp. 54–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Roberts, J.M. (2012) Discourse or Dialogue? Habermas, the Bakhtin Circle, and the question of concrete utterances, Theory and Society, 41(4), pp. 395–419.Google Scholar
  14. TellMAMA. (2015) ‘Teacher in Rotherham under police investigation for alleged Anti-Muslim bigotry,’ TellMAMA. Available from: (Accessed 10/20, 2015).
  15. The Active Change Foundation. (2015) #NotInMyName. Available from: (Accessed 02/01, 2016).
  16. Zavala, I.M. (1990) Bakhtin and Otherness: Social Heterogeneity. In Mikhail Bakhtin and the Epistemology of Discourse, Critical Studies, Vol. 2 No. 1/2, ed. C. Thomson, The Netherlands: Rodopi, pp. 77–89.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lahore University of Management SciencesLahorePakistan

Personalised recommendations