Skip to main content

What Makes Cities Complex?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Complexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

Abstract

The rationale of this book follows dilemma (see introduction, this volume): The last four decades have witnessed the emergence of CTC (complexity theories of cities) —a domain of research that applies complexity theories to the study of cities. Studies in this domain have demonstrated that, similarly to material and organic complex systems, cities exhibit the properties of natural complex systems and, that many of the mathematical models developed to study natural complex systems also apply to cities. But there is a dilemma here as cities are large-scale artifacts and artifacts are essentially simple systems. So what makes the city a complex system? To answer this question I first draw attention to the ways in which cities differ from natural complex systems and suggest that, as a result, we have to include the cognitive capabilities of urban agents in theorizing and simulating the dynamics of cities. In particular, I draw attention to the fact that urban agents are typified by chronesthesia, that is, the ability to mentally travel in time, back to the past and forward to the future. From the recognition of this cognitive capability follows, firstly, a novel view on the dynamics of cities and the role of urban planners and designers in their dynamics. Secondly, a potential for a new field of study in which planning and design are not treated as external interventions in an otherwise spontaneous and complex urban process, but rather as integral elements in its dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Obviously not all human action and behavior is planned and we thus need to distinguish between planned behaviors and un-planned behaviors.

  2. 2.

    This might sound bizarre, but note, firstly, that agents’ behavior in the stock markets, for example, is very similar to this perception of the planned/designed city in that it is largely dominated by expectations about uncertain future events—expectations that affect our immediate future whether they come to pass or not.

References

  • P.M. Allen, Cities and Regions as Self-Organising Systems: Models of Complexity (Taylor and Francis, London, 1997)

    Google Scholar 

  • F. Attneave, Applications of Information Theory to Psychology (Holt, Rinehart and Winston, New York, 1959)

    Google Scholar 

  • P. Bak, How Nature Works: The Science of Self-Organised Criticality (Copernicus Press, New York, 1996)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • A.-L. Barabasi, Linked: How Everything Is Connected to Everything Else (Plume, New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • M. Batty, Cities and Complexity: Understanding Cities with Cellular Automata, Agent-Based Models, and Fractals (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, 2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Blumenfeld-Lieberthal, D Eilam, Physical, Behavioral, and Spatiotemporal Perspectives of Home in Humans and other Animals, in Complexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design ed by J. Portugali and E. Stolk (Springer, Heidelberg, 2016), pp.xx

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Brillouin, Negentropy Principle of Information. J. Appl. Phys. 24(9), 1152–1163 (1953)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R.L. Buckner, J.R. Andrews-Hanna, D.L. Schacter, The brain’s default network: anatomy, function, and relevance to disease. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 1–38 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J.P. Das, B.C. Kar, R.K. Parrila, Cognitive Planning: The Psychological Basis of Intelligent Behaviour (Sage, New Delhi, 1996)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Downs, D. Stea (eds.), Image and Environment: Cognitive Mapping and Spatial Behavior (Aldine Press, Chicago, 1973)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.M. Downs, D. Stea (eds.), Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping (Harper & Row, New York, 1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • D. Drai, W.N. Kafka, Y. Benjamini, G. Elmer, I. Golani, Rats and mice share common ethologically relevant parameters of exploratory behavior. Behav. Brain Res. 125, 133–140 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Eilam, I. Golani, Home base behavior of rats (Rattus norvegicus) exploring a novel environment. Behav. Brain Res. 34, 199–211 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • W.A. Freiwald, D.Y. Tsao, Functional compartmentalization and viewpoint generalization within the macaque face-processing system. Science 5(330), 845–851 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  • W.R. Garner, The Processing of Information and Structure (Erlbaum, Potomac, MD, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Gleick, The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood. (Fourth Estate, London 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  • R.G. Golledge (ed.), Wayfinding Behavior: Cognitive Mapping and other Spatial Processes (Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, MD, 1999)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Hägerstrand, Innovation Diffusion as a Spatial Process (Chicago University Press, Chicago, 1967)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, Lectures at Stuttgart University. Unpublished (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, Advanced Synergetics: An Introduction, 2nd edn. (Springer, Berlin, 1987)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, Information and Self-Organization: A Macroscopic Approach to Complex Systems (Springer, Heidelberg, 1988/2003)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, Synergetic computers and cognition, 2nd edn. (Springer 1991/2004)

    Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, J. Portugali, The face of the city is its information. J. Environ. Psychol. 23, 382–405 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, J. Portugali, A synergetic interpretation of cue-dependent prospective memory. Cogn. Process. 6, 87–97 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • H. Haken, J. Portugali, Information Adaptation: The Interplay between Shannonian and Semantic Information in Cognition (Springer, Berlin, 2015). (Springer Briefs Series)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Hubel, T.N. Wiesel, Receptive fields of single neurons in the cat’s striate cortex. J. Physiol. 148, 574–591 (1959)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Hubel, T.N. Wiesel, Receptive fields, binocular interaction and functional architecture in the cat’s visual cortex. J. Physiol. 160, 106–154 (1962)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D.H. Hubel, T.N. Wiesel, Receptive fields and functional architecture in two nonstriate visual areas (18 and 19) of the cat. J. Neurophysiol. 28, 229–289 (1965)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Kandel, The Age of Insight: The Quest to Understand the Unconscious in Art, Mind, and Brain, from Vienna 1900 to the Present (Random House, New York, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. Killingsworth, D.T. Gilbert, A wandering mind is an unhappy mind. Science 330(6006), 932 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M. Kwartler, Regulating the good you can’t think of. Urban Design Int. 3(1), 13–21 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • M.S. Livingstone, Vision and Art: the Biology of Seeing (Harry N Abrams, New York, 2002)

    Google Scholar 

  • E.N. Lorenz, Deterministic non-periodic flow. J Atm. Sci. 20, 130–141 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • B.B. Mandelbrot, The Fractal Geometry of Nature (Freeman, San Francisco, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.A. McDaniel, G.O. Einstein, Prospective Memory: An Overview and Synthesis of an Emerging Field (Sage, London, 2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Miller, The magic number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychol. Rev. 63(2), 81–97 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • G.A. Miller, E.H. Galanter, K.H. Pribram, Plans and the Structure of Behavior (Holt Rinehart & Winston, New York, 1960)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • R. Morris, G. Ward (eds.), The Cognitive Psychology of Planning (Psychology Press, Hove, 2005), pp. 53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • L. Nyberg, R. Habib, S.A.N. Kim, B. Levine, E. Tulving, Consciousness of subjective time in the brain. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107(51), 22356–22359 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • T. Poggio, T. Serre, Models of visual cortex. Scholarpedia 8(4), 3516 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • J. Portugali, Self-Organization and the City (Springer, Heidelberg, 2000)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Portugali, Complexity Cognition and the City (Springer, Heidelberg, 2011)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • J. Portugali, H. Meyer, E. Stolk, E. Tan (eds.), Complexity Theories of Cities Have Come of Age (Springer, Heidelberg, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • J. Portugali, E. Stolk, A SIRN view on design thinking—An urban design perspective. Environ. Plan. 41, 829–846 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • I. Prigogine, Time, Structure and Fluctuations. In Nobel Lectures, Chemistry 1971–1980 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  • M.E. Raichle, A.M. MacLeod et al., A default mode of brain function. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98, 676–682 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • D. Schacter, D.R. Addis, R. Buckner, Episodic simulation of future events: concepts, data, and applications. Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci. 1124, 39–60 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Schrödiner, What is Life? (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1944)

    Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Shannon, A mathematical theory of communication. Reprinted Corrections Bell Syst. Tech. J. 27(379–423), 623–656 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • C.E. Shannon, W. Weaver, The Mathematical Theory of Communication (University of Illinois Press, Illinois, 1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • T. Suddendorf, M.C. Corballis, The evolution of foresight: What is mental time travel, and is it unique to humans? Behav. Brain Sci. 30(3), 299–313 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • E. Tolman, Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychol. Rev. 56, 144–155 (1948)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • E. Tulving, Elements of Episodic Memory (Clarendon Press, Oxford, 1983)

    Google Scholar 

  • B. Tversky, Distortions in cognitive maps. Geoforum 23, 131–138 (1992) (Special theme issue on Geography, Environment and Cognition, J. Portugali, ed)

    Google Scholar 

  • D.J. Watts, The “new” science of networks. Ann. Rev Sociol 30, 243–270 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R. Wimberley, L. Morris, G. Fulkerson, Mayday 23: world population becomes more urban than rural. Rural Sociologist 27, 42–43 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juval Portugali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Portugali, J. (2016). What Makes Cities Complex?. In: Portugali, J., Stolk, E. (eds) Complexity, Cognition, Urban Planning and Design. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32653-5_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics