Abstract
In developed countries, existing buildings have the biggest share in the building stock. Given the age of construction, the property versus land values, and their slow replacement rate, low-carbon refurbishments are arguably one of the most sensible ways to mitigate environmental impacts (EIs) in the construction sector and meet the greenhouse gas (GHG) reduction targets. In this respect, Double-skin façade (DSF) has been defined as one of the most effective ways to efficiently manage interactions between outdoors and indoors, and its benefits span from passive heating and cooling to the enhancement of thermal comfort of the occupied spaces. A plethora of research does exist on the operational behaviour of the DSF. However, life cycle energy figures and EIs are yet to be established fully and comprehensively. This paper reports on findings of an on-going research project aimed at filling such a gap. More specifically, life cycle assessment (LCA) and building energy modelling (BEM) have been combined to build a methodology to help assess life cycle energy figures in a more holistic manner. Primary data have been collected from manufacturers from across Europe about all the life cycle stages and processes related to a DSF refurbishment. Results show that if on the one hand, the life cycle energy balance actually is negative, hence supporting a wider adoption of DSFs in refurbishments, on the other hand, there exists ecological and EIs that the DSF bears; that cannot be easily overlooked if a more responsive approach to the EIs is to be undertaken. Not only do these findings inform a more energy-efficient deployment of DSFs, but they also highlight the need for a more holistic and impact-driven design approach to ensure that the environmental burdens are not just shifted from one impact category to another.
Pomponi, F., Piroozfar, P. and Farr, E . (2015) Double-skin façades for the sustainable refurbishment of non-domestic buildings: a life cycle environmental impact perspective In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference, 17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ardente, F., Beccali, M., Cellura, M., & Mistretta, M. (2011). Energy and environmental benefits in public buildings as a result of retrofit actions. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 460–470.
Asdrubali, F., Baldinelli, G., D’Alessandro, F., & Scrucca, F. (2015). Life cycle assessment of electricity production from renewable energies: Review and results harmonization. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 42, 1113–1122.
Bala, A., Raugei, M., Benveniste, G., Gazulla, C., & Fullana-I-palmer, P. (2010). Simplified tools for global warming potential evaluation: when ‘good enough’ is best. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 15, 489–498.
Blengini, G. A., & di Carlo, T. (2010). The changing role of life cycle phases, subsystems and materials in the LCA of low energy buildings. Energy and Buildings, 42, 869–880.
BSI. (2010). BS EN 15643-1:2010. Sustainability of construction works—Sustainability assessment of buildings. Part 1: General framework.
BSI. (2011). PAS 2050:2011. Specification for the assessment of the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of goods and services.
Cabeza, L. F., Rincón, L., Vilariño, V., Pérez, G., & Castell, A. (2014). Life cycle assessment (LCA) and life cycle energy analysis (LCEA) of buildings and the building sector: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 29, 394–416.
Cetiner, I., & Ozkan, E. (2005). An approach for the evaluation of energy and cost efficiency of glass facades. Energy and Buildings, 37.
CIBSE. (2013). CIBSE TM 53: 2013—Refurbishment of non-domestic buildings. Chartered Institution of Building Services Engineers—Great Britain.
de Benedetti, B., Toso, D., Baldo, G. L., & Rollino, S. (2010). EcoAudit: A renewed simplified procedure to facilitate the environmentally informed material choice orienting the further life cycle analysis for ecodesigners. Materials Transactions, 51, 832–837.
de Gracia, A., Navarro, L., Castell, A., Boer, D., & Cabeza, L. F. (2013). Life cycle assessment of a ventilated facade with PCM in its air chamber. Solar Energy.
Dixit, M. K., Fernandez-Solis, J. L., Lavy, S., & Culp, C. H. (2012). Need for an embodied energy measurement protocol for buildings: A review paper. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 16, 3730–3743.
Frischknecht, R., Jungbluth, N., & Al., E. (2003). Implementation of Life Cycle Impact Assessment Methods. Final report ecoinvent 2000. Duebendorf, CH: Swiss Centre for LCI.
Gakovic, B. (2000). Areas and types of glazing and other openings in the nondomestic building stock. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 667–694.
Goedkoop, M., Heijungs, R., Huijbregts, M. A. J., de Schryver, A., Struijs, J., & Van Zelm, R. (2013). ReCiPe 2008. A life-cycle impact assessment method which comprises harmonised category indicators at the midpoint and the endpoint level. First edition (version 1.08). The Hague, the Netherlands: Netherlands Ministry of Infrastructure and the Environment.
Hammond, G. P., & Jones, C. I. (2008). Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. Proceedings of the ICE—Energy, 161. Available: http://www.icevirtuallibrary.com/content/article/10.1680/ener.2008.161.2.87.
IEA. (2014). Technology Roadmap. Energy efficient building envelopes. Paris, France: International Energy Agency.
IES. (2014). MacroFlo Calculation Methods. Technical Manual.
IPCC. (2013). Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Working Group I Contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In T. F. Stocker, D. Qin, G.-K. Plattner, M. Tignor, S. K. Allen, J. Boschung, A. Nauels, Y. Xia, V. Bex & P. M. Midgley (Eds.), Climate Change 2013—The Physical Science Basis (p. 1535). Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.
Jin, Q., & Overend, M. (2013). A prototype whole-life value optimization tool for façade design. Journal of Building Performance Simulation, 1–16.
Kim, G., Schaefer, L. A., & Kim, J. T. (2013). Development of a double-skin facade for sustainable renovation of old residential buildings. Indoor and Built Environment, 22, 180–190.
Kolokotroni, M., Robinson-Gayle, S., Tanno, S., & Cripps, A. (2004). Environmental impact analysis for typical office facades. Building Research & Information, 32, 2–16.
Malmqvist, T., Glaumann, M., Scarpellini, S., Zabalza, I., Aranda, A., Llera, E., & Diaz, S. (2011). Life cycle assessment in buildings: The ENSLIC simplified method and guidelines. Energy, 36.
Moncaster, A. M., & Symons, K. E. (2013). A method and tool for ‘cradle to grave’ embodied carbon and energy impacts of UK buildings in compliance with the new TC350 standards. Energy and Buildings, 66.
Reap, J., Roman, F., Duncan, S., & Bras, B. (2008). A survey of unresolved problems in life cycle assessment. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 13, 374–388.
Shameri, M. A., Alghoul, M. A., Sopian, K., Zain, M. F. M., & Elayeb, O. (2011). Perspectives of double skin facade systems in buildings and energy saving. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 15, 1468–1475.
Steadman, P., Bruhns, H. R., Holtier, S., Gakovic, B., Rickaby, P. A., & Brown, F. E. (2000). A classification of built forms. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 27, 73–91.
Turconi, R., Boldrin, A., & Astrup, T. (2013). Life cycle assessment (LCA) of electricity generation technologies: Overview, comparability and limitations. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 28, 555–565.
Wadel, G., Alonso, P., Zamora, J.-L., & Garrido, P. (2013). Simplified LCA in skin design: The FB720 case. International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 4, 68–81.
Weidema, B. P., Thrane, M., Christensen, P., Schmidt, J., & Løkke, S. (2008). Carbon footprint: A catalyst for life cycle assessment? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 12, 3–6.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Pomponi, F., Piroozfar, P.A.E., Farr, E.R.P. (2016). Double-Skin Façades for the Sustainable Refurbishment of Non-domestic Buildings: A Life Cycle Environmental Impact Perspective. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)