Abstract
Co-heating tests have been used by many researchers for the characterisation of the heat loss coefficient (HLC) of building envelopes. Measurements may be analysed through static, transient or dynamic approaches. A reliable identification of the HLC is obtained by the joint identification of multiple parameters including the solar aperture. The solar gains continuously depend on the relative position of the sun with regard to the building’s glazed components and on the type of emitted radiation, ranging from diffuse (overcast sky) to beam (clear sky). However in state-of-the-art static co-heating tests, only the daily mean solar radiation is analysed, leading to the identification of a static solar aperture (Aw). Practitioners then have to rely on several weeks of continuous measurements under representative but not extreme weather conditions to derive regression lines with acceptable correlation coefficients between the daily means of the measured variables. Finally, the obtained results do not allow performing dynamic predictions since the model is static. This paper first explains the advantages of the newly developed experimental protocol itself, compared to other dynamic tests recently applied in situ. It also presents a new methodology to better take the solar gains into account during the dynamic analysis of a short experiment. The proposed methodology jointly enables a more accurate identification of the general heat loss characteristics of the building and of a physically-interpretable and climate-independent solar aperture. It can be seen as the equivalent total solar transmission coefficient of the envelope under normal incidence, multiplied by the total glazed surface of the whole building envelope, and is denoted as gA eq,tot,⊥ (replaces Aw). The proposed method can be applied to characterize the static energy performance of the building and also to predict (or even control) the energy consumption under specific weather forecasts or normalized conditions.
Lethé, G. (2015) A new experiment and modelling work to jointly identify the building envelope’s thermal parameters and a physical solar aperture In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference ,17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
The term « co-heating » is not limited here to measurements under constant indoor temperature.
- 2.
The experiments under investigation are controlled in power and not in temperature.
- 3.
We here neglect the transmission through opaque components since it is more than one order of magnitude lower for relatively highly glazed building envelopes, often encountered in some residential building sectors aiming at maximizing free solar gains. The reader can refer to (Gorse et al. 2014) and in the norm ISO 13792:2005 § 4.2.3 for more information.
References
Bacher, P., & Delff, Ph. (2013). Grey-box models for thermal performance characterization of a testbox. Technical University of Denmark, IEA Annex 58—Subtask 3—CE 4.
Bacher, P., & Madsen, H. (2011). Identifying suitable models for the heat dynamics of building. Energy and Buildings, 43, 1511–1522.
Bacher, P., Thavlov, A., & Madsen, H. (2010). Models for energy performance analysis: financed by the Danish electricity saving trust. Technical University of Denmark, DTU Informatics, IMM-Technical Report Feb 2010.
Bauwens, G., & Roels, S. (2014). Co-heating test: a state-of-the-art. Energy and Buildings, 82, 136–172.
Gorse, C., et al. (2014). The gap between calculated and real performance: experiences from the field and the measures required to address the difference. CeBE: Leeds Sustainability Institute.
ISO, 9869-1. (2014). Thermal insulation—Building elements—In-situ measurement of thermal resistance and thermal transmittance—Part 1: Heat flow meter method. 1st edition.
Johnston, D., Miles-Shenton, D., Farmer, D., & Wingfield, J. (2013). In-situ thermal performance of construction products, building elements and structures. N0191 whole house heat loss test method (Co-heating). CEN/TC 89/WG 13.
Lethé, G., et al. (2013). Dynamic analysis replication of a testbox in various climates. Belgian Building Research Institute, IEA Annex 58—Subtask 3—CE 4.
Lethé, G., et al. (2014). An adapted co-heating test and experimental infrastructure for thermal dynamic response and performance identification of residential buildings. In: 9th international conference on system simulation in buildings.
Pandraud, G., Mangematin, E., Roux, D ., & Quentin, E. (2013). QUB: a new rapid building energy diagnosis method. In 11th REHVA world congress and 8th international conference on IAQVEC.
Steskens, P., Lethé, G., & Flamant, G. (2014). The application of a modified co-heating test and grey-box modelling for predicting building thermal dynamics. In 10th Nordic symposium on building physics. Lund, Sweden. 15–19 June 2014.
Subbarao, K., et al. (1988). Short-Term Energy Monitoring (STEM): Application of the PSTAR Method to a Residence in Fredericksburg, Virginia. Solar Energy Research Institute, US Department of Energy, Task No. SB811241.
Acknowledgments
This paper is published in the context of the pre-normative research project ‘PERFECT’ with the financial support of the Belgian Bureau for Standardisation (NBN).
We hereby thank all the people involved in the measurements for their support and more specifically Brieuc Meurisse.
We thank the whole group of IEA Annex58 members and specially Peder Bacher, Geert Bauwens, Guillaume Pandraud and Pavel Kopecky for the interesting discussions and shared ideas during and between the expert meetings.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lethé, G. (2016). A New Experiment and Modelling Work to Jointly Identify the Building Envelope’s Thermal Parameters and a Physical Solar Aperture. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_12
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_12
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7
eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)