Skip to main content

A Case Study of the Metrics of Capturing the ‘Green’ Improvements on a New Office Building

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 837 Accesses

Abstract

In 2014 Skanska sponsored a WGBC report; ‘Health, Wellbeing, and Productivity in Offices; a new chapter for green building’. This proposes a framework of metrics for monitoring green building performance relating to the physical environment, employee perceptions, and financial costs/benefits of variation in occupant health and wellbeing as a result of occupying green office buildings. This paper sets out a methodology in a case study of a recently constructed Skanska office in Bentley (Yorkshire) called Neelands House, where these metrics are being applied in a state-of-the art green facility. This will provide before and after comparisons of how the old/new buildings affect employees, as well as a form of web-based Post Occupancy Evaluation (POE) which could begin to change the way investors approach green refurbishment opportunities. This paper sets out the methodology adopted, lessons learned, and outputs from the initial occupant surveys, however, this research process is ongoing, with the first conclusions on financial and physical metrics to be drawn 18 months post occupancy in the summer of 2016. Skanska are active in the refurbishment market in the UK, demonstrated through their presence on public procurement frameworks for EPC such as RE:FIT, Essentia, and CEF, as well as having carried out green refurbishments to a number of their own offices. A major deterrent for green build/refurbishment appears to be poor understanding of how to deliver projects successfully post-implementation through adopting the necessary operational procedures. Concepts such as the performance gap, and perceived poor ROIs make investment unattractive and a lack of understanding on how best to operate and evaluate sustainable buildings in use, are slowing uptake. The business case for green build/refurbishment is primarily based on operational savings. While significant, these only account for a fraction of an organisation ongoing costs, and the case for investment is far from compelling. Decision makers for Green interventions are not increasing uptake rates as quickly as desirable. We see a need to lead in this area, and are now applying this framework of metrics to Skanska’s own office buildings in order to develop the methodology further.

Pottage, C. and Jeffrey, H. (2015) A case study of the metrics of capturing the ‘green’ improvements on a new office building In; Gorse, C and Dastbaz, M (Eds.) International SEEDS Conference, 17–18 September 2015, Leeds Beckett University UK, Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design for Society.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   219.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   279.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Such as the emergence of Energy Performance Contracting- a cost-neutral means of delivering sustainable refurbishments to large estates whereby initial capital investment can be 3rd party, or self funded, and paid back through guaranteed utility and operational cost savings over the course of a prescribed payback period.

References

  • Bako-Biro, Z., et al. (2012). Ventilation rates in schools and pupils’ performance. Building and Environment, 48, 215–223.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banbury, S. P., & Berry, D. C. (2005). Office noise and employee concentration: Identifying causes of disruption and potential improvements. Ergonomics 48(1), 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., & Barrett, L. (2010). The potential of positive places: Senses, brain and spaces. Intelligent Buildings International, 2(3), 218–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P., et al. (2013). A holistic, multi-level analysis identifying the impact of classroom design on pupils’ learning. Building and Environment 59, 678–689.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bordass, B., Leaman, A., & Ruyssevelt, P. (2001). Assessing building performance in use 5: Conclusions and implications. Building Research and Information 29(2), 144–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Browning, B. (2012) The Economics of Biophilia: Why designing with nature in mind makes sense. http://www.interfacereconnect.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/The-Economics-of-Biophilia_Terrapin-Bright-Green-2012e_1.pdf. Accessed 12 Aug 2014.

  • Building Research Establishment. (2015). Post occupancy evaluation. https://www.bre.co.uk/page.jsp?id=1793. (Last visited 20/07/2015).

  • CIBSE. (2015). CIBSE guide a- environmental design (8th ed.). London: Chartered Institution of Service Engineers. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Climate Change. (2011). Meeting Carbon Budgets- 3rd progress Report to Parliament 2011. London: CCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Climate Change. (2013). Meeting Carbon Budgets- 2013 progress Report to Parliament 2013. London: CCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Climate Change. (2014). Meeting Carbon Budgets- 2014 progress Report to Parliament 2013. London: CCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Communities and Local Government. (2008). Britain’s Building Stock- a Carbon Challenge. 1700 Cued. 12.11.08.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Wilde, P. (2014). The gap between predicted and measured energy performance of buildings: A framework for investigation. Automation in Construction, 41(40–49), 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, W. (2000). Health and productivity gains from better indoor environments and their relationship with building energy efficiency. Energy and Environment, 2000(25), 537–566.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisk, W. (2012). Changing ventilation rates in U.S. Offices: Implications for health, work performance, energy and associated economics. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup. (2010). The state of the global workplace: A worldwide study of employee engagement and wellbeing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harter, J., et al. (2002). Wellbeing in the workplace and its relationship to Business outcomes: A review of the Gallup Studies. In Keyes and Haidt. Flourishing: The positive person and the good life (pp. 205–224).Washington DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. (2007a). An evaluation of office productivity measurement. Journal of Corporate Real Estate; 2007; 9, 3, 3Pro Quest Business Collection pg 144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, B. (2007b). Office productivity: A theoretical framework. Journal of Corporate Real Estate, 2007; 9, 2; ProQuest Business Collection pg 97.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, N., et al. (2009). Green buildings and productivity. Journal of Sustainable Real Estate, 1, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsham, G., et al. (2012). Do green buildings outperform conventional buildings?. Indoor Environment and energy performance in North American offices: NRC Publications Archive.

    Google Scholar 

  • Satish, U., et al. (2012). Is CO2 an Indoor pollutant? Direct effects of low- to moderate CO2 concentrations on human decision- making performance. Environmental Health Perspective, 21, 2012. doi:10.1289/ehp.1104789.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sentman, D. (2009). Healthy buildings: Green building standards, benefits and incentives. The Journal of Biolaw and Business, 12, 1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppanen, O., et al. (2005). 2005. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Control of temperature for health and productivity in offices.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seppanen, O., et al. (2006). 2006. Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory: Effect of temperature on task performance in office environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh, A., et al. (2010). Effects of green buildings on employee health and productivity. American Journal of Public Health. Published ahead of print. July 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Carbon Trust. (2015). Titans or Titanics?. London, UK: Understanding the business response to climate change and resource scarcity. 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ulrich, R. (1984). View through a window may influence recovery from surgery. Science, 224, 420. doi:10.1126/science.6143402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Green Building Council. (2013). The business case for green building: A review of the costs and benefits for investors and occupants. World Green Building Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • World Green Building Council. (2014). Health wellbeing and productivity in offices; A new chapter for green building. World Green Building Council.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wyon, D. (2004). The effects of indoor air quality on performance and productivity (14 (suppl 7), 92–101). Denmark: Indoor Air 2004.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chris Pottage .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Pottage, C., Jeffrey, H. (2016). A Case Study of the Metrics of Capturing the ‘Green’ Improvements on a New Office Building. In: Dastbaz, M., Gorse, C. (eds) Sustainable Ecological Engineering Design. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32646-7_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32645-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32646-7

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics