Abstract
This chapter examines the discursive construction of collaboration as systems of beliefs and knowledge in a Hong Kong school–university partnership collaborative action research (CAR) project. This case study was situated in a context when key educational reform was being introduced in secondary schools at the time, with school–university collaboration seen as a way to build teachers’ capacity to implement new assessment practices in English language classrooms. The notion of beliefs (‘truths’) refers to the analysis of the explicit word choices and attitudes stated by the teachers and researchers in the textual data collected from the case study. This chapter also critically examines how these beliefs reflect or contest discourses about school–university collaboration in the broader sociopolitical context of Hong Kong, for example, how statements about collaboration are located in other discourses. The objective of this chapter is not so much to judge the beliefs stated by the teachers and researchers, but to explore the ways in which ‘truths’ were foregrounded in the case study and how these beliefs shaped the construction of CAR as a social practice. The analysis of the textual data in this chapter suggests that the school–university CAR project was predominantly shaped by the curriculum reform and partnership discourses that were circulating in the sociocultural context at the time of the study.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ACTEQ. (2006). Towards a learning profession: Interim report. Hong Kong: HK SAR Government Publication.
Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for english language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.
Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475.
Education Commission. (2000). Reform proposal for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong HKSAR. Retrieved from http://www.e-c.edu.hk/eng/reform/annex/Edu-reform-eng.pdf
Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.
Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.
Foucault, M. (1978). The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.
Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.
Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2013). Facilitating practitioner research: Developing transformational partnerships. London: Routledge.
Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education.
HKEAA. (2014). School-based assessment teachers’ handbook (English Language). Hong Kong HKSAR.
Johnston, B. (2009). Collaborative teacher development. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 241–249). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.
Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman Educational Books.
Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421–430.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Chan, C. (2016). Negotiating Beliefs and Practices in School–University Collaboration. In: School-University Partnerships in English Language Teacher Education. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32617-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32619-1
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)