Skip to main content

Negotiating Beliefs and Practices in School–University Collaboration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
School-University Partnerships in English Language Teacher Education

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Education ((BRIEFSEDUCAT))

  • 494 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter examines the discursive construction of collaboration as systems of beliefs and knowledge in a Hong Kong school–university partnership collaborative action research (CAR) project. This case study was situated in a context when key educational reform was being introduced in secondary schools at the time, with school–university collaboration seen as a way to build teachers’ capacity to implement new assessment practices in English language classrooms. The notion of beliefs (‘truths’) refers to the analysis of the explicit word choices and attitudes stated by the teachers and researchers in the textual data collected from the case study. This chapter also critically examines how these beliefs reflect or contest discourses about school–university collaboration in the broader sociopolitical context of Hong Kong, for example, how statements about collaboration are located in other discourses. The objective of this chapter is not so much to judge the beliefs stated by the teachers and researchers, but to explore the ways in which ‘truths’ were foregrounded in the case study and how these beliefs shaped the construction of CAR as a social practice. The analysis of the textual data in this chapter suggests that the school–university CAR project was predominantly shaped by the curriculum reform and partnership discourses that were circulating in the sociocultural context at the time of the study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • ACTEQ. (2006). Towards a learning profession: Interim report. Hong Kong: HK SAR Government Publication.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (1999). Collaborative action research for english language teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, A. (2009). Action research in second language teacher education. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 289–297). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th ed.). Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, C. (2006). Collaboration between ESL and content teachers: How do we know when we are doing it right? The International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 9(4), 454–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Education Commission. (2000). Reform proposal for the education system in Hong Kong. Hong Kong HKSAR. Retrieved from http://www.e-c.edu.hk/eng/reform/annex/Edu-reform-eng.pdf

  • Fairclough, N. (2001). Critical discourse analysis. In M. Wetherell, S. Taylor, & S. J. Yates (Eds.), Discourse as data: A guide for analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fairclough, N. (2003). Analysing discourse. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1978). The will to knowledge. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison (A. Sheridan, Trans.). London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groundwater-Smith, S., Mitchell, J., Mockler, N., Ponte, P., & Ronnerman, K. (2013). Facilitating practitioner research: Developing transformational partnerships. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K., & Matthiessen, C. (2004). An introduction to functional grammar (3rd ed.). London: Hodder Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • HKEAA. (2014). School-based assessment teachers’ handbook (English Language). Hong Kong HKSAR.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, B. (2009). Collaborative teacher development. In A. Burns & J. C. Richards (Eds.), The Cambridge guide to second language teacher education (pp. 241–249). New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, L., & Jørgensen, M. (2002). Discourse analysis as theory and method. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stenhouse, L. (1975). An introduction to curriculum research and development. London: Heineman Educational Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stewart, T. (2006). Teacher-researcher collaboration or teachers’ research. TESOL Quarterly, 40, 421–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cheri Chan .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chan, C. (2016). Negotiating Beliefs and Practices in School–University Collaboration. In: School-University Partnerships in English Language Teacher Education. SpringerBriefs in Education. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32619-1_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32617-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32619-1

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics