Skip to main content

Alternative Assessment: Growth, Development and Future Directions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

Abstract

This chapter will attempt to focus on alternative assessment from a pedagogical perspective (i.e. in the context of learning environments that address students with and without special needs). Thus, the purpose of this chapter is threefold: (1) to investigate how alternative assessment has been used in the United States and elsewhere, (2) to define the general characteristics of alternative assessment (in particular, portfolios), and (3) to examine the direction that alternative assessment has taken in recent years within SPED (Special Education) programs, ESL (English as a Second Language) and/or EFL (English as a Foreign Language) classrooms. This chapter offers a significant contribution to the field of ESL/EFL by demonstrating that alternative assessment best serves the needs of English Language Learners (ELLs) with and without speech impairments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Ali, S. Y. (2002). Portfolio assessment: Motivating ESP students to write better through continuous assessment. In S. Troudi, S. Riley & C. Coombe, C. (Eds.), EFL challenges in the new millennium. TESOL Arabia 2001 Conference Proceedings (Vol. 6).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ali, S. Y. (2005). An introduction to electronic portfolios in the language classroom. The Internet TESL Journal, 11(8). Retrieved from http://iteslj.org.

  • Allen, L. Q. (2004). Implementing a culture portfolio project within a constructivist paradigm. Foreign Language Annals, 37(2), 232–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bachman, L. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Balhous, R. (2008). The self-assessed portfolio: A case study. Assessment and Evaluation in Higher Education, 33(4), 381–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banfi, C. S. (2003). Portfolios: Integrating advanced language, academic, and professional skills. ELT Journal, 57(1), 34–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, S., Kevorkian, J., & Delett, J. (1999). Portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Washington, DC: National Capital Language Resource Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. (1999). New vistas: An interactive course in English. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. (2002). Strategies for success: A practical guide to learning English. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: Principles and classroom practices. New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, J. D., & Hudson, T. (1998). The alternatives in language assessment. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 653–675.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caner, A. (2010). Students’ views on using portfolio assessment in EFL writing courses. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 10(1), 223–236.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cawthon, S. (2011). Making decisions about assessment practices for students who are deaf or hard of hearing. Remedial and Special Education, 32(1), 4–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coombe, C., Folse, K., & Hubley, N. (2007). A practical guide to assessing English language learners. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Delett, J. S., Barnhardt, S., & Kevorkian, J. A. (2001). A framework for portfolio assessment in the foreign language classroom. Foreign Language Annals, 34(6), 559–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot, S. (2010). Effects of using modified items to test students with persistent academic difficulties. Exceptional Children, 76(4), 475–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, H. (1983). Frames of mind: The theory of multiple intelligences. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Genesee, F., & Upshur, J. A. (1996). Classroom-based evaluation in second language education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottlieb, M. (1995). Nurturing student learning through portfolios. TESOL Journal, 5, 12–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hager, K., & Slocum, T. (2011). Using alternate assessment to improve educational outcomes. Rural Special Education Quarterly, 30(1), 24–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamayan, E. V. (1995). Approaches to alternative assessment. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 15, 212–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haney, W., & Madaus, G. (1989). Searching for alternatives to standardized tests: Whys, whats, and whithers. Phi Delta Kappan, 70, 683–687.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, J. (2012). The implementation of portfolio assessment in integrated English course. English Language and Literature Studies, 2(4), 15–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huerta-Marcia, (1995). Alternative assessment: Responses to commonly asked questions. TESOL Journal, 5, 8–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jankelowitz, D. L., & Bortz, M. A. (1996). The interaction of bilingualism and stuttering in an adult. Journal of Communication Disorders, 29, 223–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, P. (2012). The benefits and administration of alternate assessments. New Horizons of Learning, 10(1). Retrieved from http://education.jhu.edu/PD/newhorizons/Journals/Winter2012/Johnson.

  • Kearns, J., Towles-Reeves, E., Kleinert, H., Kleinert, J., & Thomas, M. (2011). Characteristics of and implications for students participating in alternate assessments based on alternate academic achievement standards. Journal of Special Education, 45(1), 3–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelner, L. B. (1993). The creative classroom: A guide for using creative drama in the classroom, preK-6. Portsmouth: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kettler, R. (2011). Computer-based screening for the new modified alternate assessment. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Little, D. (2005). The Common European Framework and the European Language Portfolio: Involving learners and their judgments in the assessment process. Language Testing, 22, 321–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lo, Y. (2010). Implementing reflective portfolios for promoting autonomous learning among EFL college students in Taiwan. Language Teaching Research, 14(1), 77–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, B. K. (2001). The ethical potential of alternative language assessment. In C. Elder (Ed.), Experimenting with uncertainty: Essays in honour of Alan Davies (pp. 228–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morsink, C. V., Thomas, C. C., & Correa, V. I. (1991). Interactive teaming: Consultation and collaboration in special programs. New York, NY: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moya, S. S., & O’Malley, J. M. (1994). A portfolio assessment model for ESL. The Journal of Educational Issues of Language Minority Students, 13, 13–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Musson, J., Thomas, M., Towles-Reeves, E., & Kearns, J. (2010). An analysis of state alternate assessment participation guidelines. Journal of Special Education, 44(2), 67–78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Malley, J. M., & Pierce, L. V. (1996). Authentic assessment for English language learners: Practical approaches for teachers. White Plains, NY: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peters, T. J., & Guitar, B. (1991). Stuttering: An integrated approach to its nature and treatment. Baltimore, MD: Williams and Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierce, L. V., & O’Malley, J. M. (1992). Performance and portfolio assessment for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, V. S. (1998). Disfluency: A cross-linguistic comparison. Unpublished manuscript, University of Kansas.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, V. S. (2000). Stuttering in the context of bilingualism: The relationship between language proficiency and degree of stuttering. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Kansas, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, V. S. (2014). Special needs learners, diagnosis and intervention: Alternative assessment. Paper Presented at the Oman 14th International ELT Conference, Muscat, Oman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, V. S., & Kozhevnikova, L. (2008). Alternative assessment and the use of portfolios in the United States and Russia. In International Academic-Applied Conference, Moscow, Russia. Moscow: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, V. S., & Nagaswami, G. (1997). Attenuating speech disability with e-mail. Paper Presented at the Thirty-first Annual Convention & Exposition of the Teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages, Inc., Orlando, Florida.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roach, A., Beddow, P., Kurz, A., Kettler, R., & Elliott, S. (2010). Incorporating student input in developing alternate assessments based on modified academic achievement standards. Exceptional Children, 77(1), 61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spada, N., & Frolich, M. (1995). Communicative orientation of language teaching observation scheme. Sydney: National Centre for English Language Teaching and Research, Macquarie University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Staton, J., Shuy, R. W., Peyton, J. K., & Reed, L. (1987). Dialogue journal communication: Classroom, linguistic, social and cognitive views. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tierney, R. J., Carter, M. A., & Desai, L. E. (1991). Portfolio assessment in the reading-writing classroom. Norwood: Christopher Gordon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Riper, C. (1982). The nature of stuttering. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weigle, S. C. (2002). Assessing writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Woods, D. W., & Wright, L. W., Jr. (1998). Dismantling simplified regulated and experimental breathing: A case of a bilingual stutterer. Journal of Behavior Therapy Psychiatry, 29, 179–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright, P., & Wright, P. (2007). Wrightslaw: Special education law (2nd ed.). Virginia: Harbor House Law Press Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yawkey, T. D., Gonzalez, V., & Juan, Y. (1994). Literacy and biliteracy strategies and approaches for young culturally and linguistically diverse children: Academic excellence P.I.A.G.E.T. comes alive. Journal of Reading Improvement, 3(3), 130–141.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vino Sarah Reardon .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Reardon, V.S. (2017). Alternative Assessment: Growth, Development and Future Directions. In: Al-Mahrooqi, R., Coombe, C., Al-Maamari, F., Thakur, V. (eds) Revisiting EFL Assessment. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32601-6_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32599-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32601-6

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics