Skip to main content

Competition and Stakeholder Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Unknown Values and Stakeholders

Abstract

In the last chapter we introduced and explained the concept of competitive divide. Here, we elaborate more on the issue and we develop a new type of socioeconomic inequality as defined by the competitive divide, namely, employees who are subject and are not subject to competition.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Acemoglu, Daron and James A. Robinson. 2012. Why nations fail: The origins of power, prosperity, and poverty. Crown Publishing Group, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bower, Joseph L., Herman B. Leonard and Lynn S. Paine. 2011. Capitalism at risk: Rethinking the role of business. Harvard Business Review Press, Watertown, Mass., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Breton, Albert, Gianluigi Galeotti, Pierre Salmon and Ronald Wintrobe. 1991. The competitive state. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chymis, Athanasios. 2008. Reconciling Friedman with corporate social responsibility: How market competition affects corporate social performance. AV AkademikerVerlag, SaarbrĂĽcken, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chymis, Athanasios, Massimiliano Di Bitetto and Paolo D’Anselmi. 2015. Corporate social performance needs more competition not less: An idea for a paradigm shift in CSP. In Corporate social performance: Paradoxes, pitfalls and pathways to the better world, 37-56. Stachowicz-Stanusch, Agata, ed. Information Age Publishing, Charlotte, NC., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demsetz, Harold. 1982. Economic, legal and political dimensions of competition. North Holland, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Bitetto, Massimiliano, Gianmarco Gilardoni and Paolo D’Anselmi, eds. 2013. SMEs as the unknown stakeholder: Entrepreneurship in the political arena. Palgrave Macmillan, New York, USA and Basingstoke, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Bitetto, Massimiliano, Salvatore Pettineo and Paolo D’Anselmi. 2015b. Dear brands of the world: CSR and social media. In Corporate social responsibility in the digital age, Volume 7: 39-61. Adi, Ana, Georgiana Grigore and David Crowther, eds. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, Bingley, West Yorkshire, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drèze, Jean and Amartya Sen. 2013. An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Alessandro. 1999 – unpublished. Alcuni fattori di debolezza della cultura politica democratica in Italia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, Milton. 1962. Capitalism and freedom. University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein, Peter G. 2005. The Make-or-Buy Decision: Lessons from empirical studies. In Handbook of new institutional economics, 435-464. Menard, Claude and Mary M. Shirley, eds. Springer-Verlag, Berlin and Heidelberg, Germany.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lancaster, Kelvin. 1973. The dynamic inefficiency of capitalism. Journal of Political Economy 81(5): 1092–1109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lapiccirella, Andrea. 2015. On bureaucratic behavior. In Public management as corporate social responsibility. The Economic bottom line of Government. Di Bitetto, Massimiliano, Athanasios Chymis and Paolo D’Anselmi, eds. 2015a. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall, Alfred. 2010. Principles of economics. Abridged Edition. Cosimo Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Micelli, Stefano. 2010. Public address. Vicenza, Italy. May 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. 1968. Non-market decision-making – The peculiar economics of bureaucracy. American Economic Review 58(2): 293–305. American Economic Association, Nashville, TN., USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Niskanen, William A. 1971 (2001). Bureaucracy: A final perspective. In The Elgar Companion to Public Choice. William A. Shughart and Laura Razzolini, eds. Edward Elgar Publishing, Northampton, Mass., USA and Cheltenham, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olson, Mancur. 1965. The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, Thomas. 2014. Capital in the twenty-first century. Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert. 1993. Making democracy work: Civic traditions in modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruggeri, Tommaso. 2010. Public address. Vicenza, Italy. May 5.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and macrobehavior. W.W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2005. The good company. Survey on CSR, January 22.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2008. In the stream. Survey on CSR, January 19.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Economist. 2011 Oh, Mr Porter – The new big idea from business’s greatest living guru seems a bit undercooked. Schumpeter column, March 10.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

D’Anselmi, P., Chymis, A., Di Bitetto, M. (2017). Competition and Stakeholder Analysis. In: Unknown Values and Stakeholders . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32591-0_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics