Advertisement

Imagination: Scenarios and Alternative Futures

  • Ian Miles
  • Ozcan Saritas
  • Alexander Sokolov
Chapter
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)

Abstract

In ForSTI, scenarios are systematic accounts of particular configurations of future possibilities—a scenario is a systematic account (we might say “appraisal”, and people often talk of “vision”) of a possible future state of affairs and the paths of development leading to it. There are many uses for scenarios in ForSTI, for example, to:

Keywords

Systematic Account Scenario Development Multiple Scenario Alternative Future Scenario Approach 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Berkhout, F., & Hentin, J. (2002). Foresight futures scenarios: Developing and applying a participative strategic planning tool. GMI newsletter. Retrieved January 1, 2016, from http://greenleaf-publishing.com/productdetail.kmod?productid=416
  2. Bezold, C. (2009). Jim Dator’s alternative futures and the path to IAF’s aspirational futures. Journal of Futures Studies, 14(2), 123–134.Google Scholar
  3. Coates, J. F., Mahaffie, J. B., & Hines, A. (1998). 2025: Scenarios of US and global society reshaped by science and technology. Greensboro: Oakhill Press.Google Scholar
  4. Codagnone, C. (2009). Reconstructing the whole: Present and future of personal health systems. Report to European Commission from Framework Programme 7 project PHS2020. Available from http://www.ehealthnews.eu/images/stories/pdf/phs2020-book-rev16082009.pdf
  5. Freeman, C., & Jahoda, M. (Eds.). (1978). World futures: The great debate. London: Martin Robertson.Google Scholar
  6. Green, L., Popper, R., & Miles, I. (2005). From Seville to success: IST success scenario and policy priorities. In C. Pascu et al. (Eds.), Challenges and opportunities for IST research and applications (pp. 154–187). Bucharest: Academia Romana, Publishing House of Romanian Academy of Sciences. ISBN 973-27-1289-9.Google Scholar
  7. Groves, D. G., & Lempert, R. J. (2007). A new analytic method for finding policy-relevant scenarios. Global Environmental Change, 17, 73–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Haegeman, K., Spiesberger, M., Veselitskaya, N., Sokolov, A., & Weiss, G. (2015). FTA supporting effective priority setting in multi-lateral research programme cooperation: The case of EU-Russia S&T cooperation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 101, 200–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Institute of Innovation Research. (2003). Prospecting bioscience for the future of non-food uses of crops. Manchester Business School, Report to The Government Industry Forum on Non Food Uses of Crops. Retrieved September 9, 2014, from http://les1.man.ac.uk/cric/Andrew_McMeekin/biosciencenfc.htm
  10. James, A., & Miles, I. (2010). Using scenarios to characterise complex policy interrelationships: The SANDERA Project. In B. Auffermann & J. Kaskinen (Eds.), Security in futures—Security in change (pp. 154–168). Turku: FFRC. FFRC eBOOK 5/(2011); ISBN 978-952-249-063-6; ISSN 1797-132. Retrieved from http://ffrc.utu.fi/julkaisut/e-julkaisuja/eTutu_(2011)_5.pdf#page=144
  11. Lempert, R. J., Popper, S. W., & Bankes, S. C. (2003). Shaping the next one hundred years: New methods for quantitative, long-term policy analysis. Santa Monica, CA: RAND Corporation. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1626.html
  12. Miles, I. (2005). Scenario planning. In UNIDO technology foresight manual, Volume 1: Organization and methods (pp. 168–193). Vienna: UNIDO. Retrieved January 18, 2016, from http://www.research.ro/img/files_up/1226911327TechFor_1_unido.pdf
  13. Pascu, C., Compano, R., & Weber, M. (Eds.). (2005). Challenges and opportunities for IST research and applications. Bucharest: Publishing House of Romanian Academy of Sciences Academia Romana. Available from http://fistera.jrc.es/pages/books/content%20Challenges%20book/challenges%20book.htm
  14. Ringland, G. (1998). Scenario planning: Managing for the future. Chichester: Wiley.Google Scholar
  15. Rhydderch, A. (2009). Scenario planning: Guidance note. London: Foresight Horizon Scanning Centre, Government Office for Science. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://www.dti.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/horizon-scanning-centre/foresight_scenario_planning.pdf
  16. Rush, H., & Miles, I. (1989). Surveying the social implications of information technology. Futures, 21(3), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Scase, R. (1999). Britain towards 2010: The changing business environment. London: Economic and Social Research Council (This was originally digitally available at: http://www.esrc.ac.uk/2010/docs/britain.html, but is no longer archived there; hard copies are retailed from usual sources.).
  18. Schwartz, P. (1991). The art of the long view. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
  19. Tapio, P. (2003). Disaggregative policy Delphi: Using cluster analysis as a tool for systematic scenario formation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 70(1), 83–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Wagar, W. W. (1991). The next three futures. London: Adamantine.Google Scholar
  21. Waverley Management Consultants. (2007). Scenario planning toolkit. London: Department for Transport. Retrieved January 15, 2016, from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20140108140803/http:/www.bis.gov.uk/assets/foresight/docs/horizon-scanning-centre/foresight_scenario_planning.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Miles
    • 1
  • Ozcan Saritas
    • 1
  • Alexander Sokolov
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations