Intelligence: Delphi

  • Ian Miles
  • Ozcan Saritas
  • Alexander Sokolov
Part of the Science, Technology and Innovation Studies book series (STAIS)


Delphi approaches are often seen as the main tool in ForSTI studies. Though many major exercises have been mounted without any use of these at all, the variety of forms and applications means that they can then prove valuable. Given their prominence, and their particular features, a chapter devoted to Delphi approaches makes sense in this book. Another reason is that there are many misunderstandings about why and how to conduct Delphis.


Delphi Method Delphi Study Topic Statement Delphi Survey Alternative Future 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Gordon, T. J. (2008). “The Real-Time Delphi Method”, excerpt from futures research methodology—v3.0, the millennium project. Accessed July 25, 2016, from
  2. Linstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (Eds.). (1975). The Delphi method, techniques and applications. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley (2002 version). Retrieved January 15, 2016, from
  3. Loveridge, D., Miles, I., with Keenan, M., Popper, R., & Thomas, D. (2004). European knowledge society foresight: The EUFORIA Project Synthesis Report. Dublin: European Foundation. Retrieved January 12, 2016, from
  4. NISTEP. (2010). The 9th Delphi survey: The 9th Science and Technology Foresight: Contribution of Science and Technology to Future Society (summary). A report on study supported by Special Coordination Funds for Promoting Science and Technology, FY2009, NISTEP report no. 140, Science and Technology Foresight Center, NISTEP, Tokyo. Accessed July 25, 2016 from
  5. Okuwada, K. (2010a). Toward a new type of science and technology foresight. Presentation given at the AUGUR workshop on lessons from comparative approaches of recent foresight exercises on June 2. Retrieved February 2, 2016, from
  6. Okuwada, K. (2010b). The latest Japanese Delphi. Presentation given at the UNIDO Technology Foresight Training Programme, Module 1: Technology Foresight for Organizers. Retrieved February 9, 2016, from
  7. Popper, R., & Miles, I. (2005). The FISTERA Delphi future challenges, applications and priorities for socially beneficial information society technologies. Report prepared for FISTERA project. Retrieved January 14, 2016, from
  8. Saritas, O., & Oner, M. A. (2004). Systemic analysis of UK foresight results: Joint application of integrated management model and roadmapping. Technological Forecasting & Social Change, 71(1–2), 27–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Scapolo, F., & Miles, I. (2006). Eliciting experts’ knowledge: A comparison of two methods. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 679–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shrikawa, N. (2011). Foresight-related activities at NISTEP. Presentation given at the UNIDO Mutual Learning Workshop, Bucharest, August 29–31. Retrieved February 10, 2016, from
  11. Urashima, K. (2015). Overview of 40 years foresight experiences in Japan. Presentation given at the 1st Asian Innovation Forum. Retrieved February 9, 2016, from!Board/down.php?wd=1&bf_code=64

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ian Miles
    • 1
  • Ozcan Saritas
    • 1
  • Alexander Sokolov
    • 1
  1. 1.Higher School of EconomicsNational Research UniversityMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations