Abstract
Christopher Coker establishes the essential challenge for anyone peering into the future when he poses the question; “what future are we interested in?”1 In that context Britain’s ability to act strategically requires a state to possess a whole series of imponderables all of which are context dependent; sufficient capability, influence, political will, and strategic know-how to influence the choices of other great powers in line with their national interests. On 9 February, 1936, the Oxford Union passed a motion that stated; “This House will in no circumstances fight for its king and country”. Given that several of those who voted for the motion went on to hold high office in British governments the vote came as a shock to many given the Nazi aggression of the time. A casual observer of contemporary Britain might think that similar currents of pacifism and appeasement are afoot in a country that seems to have lost not just its strategic bearing, but in many ways its will to compete. Rather, Britain seems lost in a sea of politically-correct, health and safety irresolution in which to many, all the faults of the world are somehow Britain’s fault.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsBibliography
Coker, Christopher. 2015. Future War. London: Polity.
de Wijk, Rob. 2015. Power Politics. Amsterdam: AUP Papers.
Freedman, Lawrence. 2013. Strategy: A History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Her Majesty’s Government. 2015. National Security Strategy and Strategic Defence and Security Review 2015. London: Her Majesty’s Government.
Jenkin, Bernard, ed. 2015. Defence Acquisition in the Twenty-First Century. London: Civitas.
Johnson, Boris. 2014. The Churchill Factor. London: Hodder & Stoughton.
Kissinger, Henry. 2014. World Order. London: Penguin.
Lasconjarias, Guillaume, and Jeffrey A. Larsen. 2015. NATO’s Response to Hybrid Threats. Rome: NATO Defense College.
Lindley-French, Julian. 2007. A Chronology of European Security and Defence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
———. 2015a. NATO: The Enduring Alliance. London: Routledge.
———. 2015b. Little Britain. Charleston: CS Publishing.
Lindley-French, Julian, and Y. Boyer, eds. 2014. The Oxford Handbook of War. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Myers, Steven Lee. 2015. The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin. New York: Knopf.
NATO. 2014. Wales Summit Declaration. Brussels: NATO.
UK Ministry of Defence. 2014. Defence Inflation Estimate Statistical Notice 2012–2013. London: Ministry of Defence.
Urban, Mark. 2015. The Edge. London: Little, Brown.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Lindley-French, J. (2016). Could Britain Respond Strategically To Russian Aggression?. In: Haaland Matlary, J., Heier, T. (eds) Ukraine and Beyond . Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32530-9_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32530-9_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32529-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32530-9
eBook Packages: Political Science and International StudiesPolitical Science and International Studies (R0)