Skip to main content

SCM-Organization: A Method for Assessing and Facilitating Organization Dialogue and Development

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Assessing and Stimulating a Dialogical Self in Groups, Teams, Cultures, and Organizations
  • 705 Accesses

Abstract

Creating a sense of urgency for the need to change is the first step in the process of reorienting a team or organization. However, such a step is often not easy to make. De Caluwé and Vermaak (2003) address the struggle between internal forces for continuing the old, familiar routines and structures and the forces that champion renewal. In their view the main source of this struggle lies in the informal organization. They use the metaphor of the iceberg to highlight that this informal organization is almost completely hidden, as only a small part is visible above the surface. The visible part literally is ‘the tip of the iceberg”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The author developed a training course for SCM-Organization together with Anne-Marie Benschop. Information about this and other SCM- and DST-training courses can be found on the webiste of the Dutch SCM-Association: www.zkmvereniging.nl

References

  • Argyris, C. (2004) Double-loop learning and organizational change: Facilitating transformational change. In: J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 389–401). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boonstra, J. J. (2004). Conclusion, some reflections and perspectives on organizing, changing and learning. In: J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 447–475). Chichester: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, A., & Hawkins, P. (2013). Team coaching. In J. Passmore, D. B. Peterson, & T. Freire (Eds.), The Wiley-Blackwell handbook of the psychology of coaching and mentoring (pp. 175–194). Oxford, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooperrider, D., Whitney, D., & Stavros, J. (2008). The appreciative inquiry handbook: for leaders of change. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cummings, Th. (2004). Organization development and change; Foundations and applications. In: Boonstra, J. J. (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 25–42). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Caluwé, L., & Vermaak, H. (2003). Learning to change: A guide for organizational change agents. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Caluwé, L., & Vermaak, H. (2004) Thinking about change in different colours; multiplicity in change processes. In: J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 197–226). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Geus, A. (1997). The living company; habits for survival in a turbulent business environment. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, S., & O’Brien, E. J. (1985). The person-situation debate in historical and current perspective. Psychological Bulletin, 98, 513–537.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fleeson, W., & Noftle, E. E. (2009). The end of the person-situation debate: An emerging synthesis in the answer tot he consistency question. Social and Personality Compass, 2, 1667–1684.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabriel, Y. (2000). Storytelling in organizations: Facts, fictions and fantasies. London: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hafsi, T., & Turgut, G. (2013). Boardroom diversity and its effect on social performance: Conceptualization and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 112, 463–479.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, C. S., & Lindzey, G. (1970). Theories of personality. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2014) Self as a society of I-positions: A dialogical approach to counseling. Journal of Humanistic Counseling, 53, 134–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M. (2001). The dialogical self: Toward a theory of personal and cultural positioning. Culture & Psychology, 7, 243–281.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Dimaggio, G. (2007). Self, identity, and globalization in times of uncertainty: A dialogical analysis. Review of General Psychology, 11, 31–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Giesser, T. (Eds.). (2012). Handbook of dialogical self theory. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Jansen, E. (1995). Self-narratives. The construction of meaning in psychotherapy. New York/London: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Hermans-Konopka, A. (2010). Dialogical self theory: Positioning and counter-positioning in a globalizing society. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Kempen, H. J. G. (1993). The dialogical self, Meaning as movement. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., & Poulie, M. F. (2000). Talent and self-narrative: The survival of an underachieving adolesecent. In F. M. van Lieshout & P. G. Heymans (Eds.), Developing talent across the lifespan (pp. 277–298). Hove, UK: Psychology Press Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans, H. J. M., Kempen, H. J. G., & Van Loon, R. J. P. (1991). The dialogical self: Beyond individualism and rationalism. American Psychologist, 47, 23–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hosking, D. M. (2004). Change works, a critical construction. In J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 259–276). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Janis, I. L. (1982). Groupthink: Psychological studies of policy decisions and fiascoes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasper, C. A., Moore, H. R., Whittaker, L. S., & Gillepsie, A. (2012). Methodological approaches to studying the self in its social context. In: H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 319–334). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindermann, Th.A., & Valsiner, J. (1995) Individual development, changing contexts, and the co-construction of person-context relations in human development. In T. A. Kindermann & J. Valsiner (Eds.), Development of person-context relations (pp. 1–9). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lencioni, P. (2002). The five dysfunctions of a team: A leadership fable. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindegger, G., & Alberts, C. (2012). The dialogical self in the new South Africa. In H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 215–233). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lodders, N. (2013). Teachers learning and innovating together; Exploring collective learning and its relationship to individual learning, transformational leadership and team performance in higher vocational education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lyddon, W. J., Yowell, D. R., & Hermans, H. J. M. (2006). The self-confrontation method: Theory, research and practical utility. Counselling Psychology Quarterly, 19, 27–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morris, E. K. (2009). Behavior analysis and ecological psychology: Past, present and future. A review of Harry Heft’s ecological psychology in context. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 92, 275–304.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Raggatt, P. T. F. (2012). Positioning in the dialogical self: recent advances in theory construction. In H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 29–45). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. (2012) The use of I-positions in psychotherapy. In: H. J. M. Hermans & T. Gieser (Eds.), Handbook of dialogical self theory (pp. 341–355). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organizational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schulz von Thun, F. (2008). Six tools for clear communication; the Hamburg approach in English language. Hamburg, Germany: Institut für Kommunikation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, H., & Stone, S. (2007). The basic elements of voice dialogue, relationship and the psychology of selves; Their origins and development. Albion, UK: Voice Dialogue International. www.voicedialogue.org

  • Van de Loo, R. P. J. M. (1992). Verheldering van loopbaanperspectief, ontwikkeling en toepassing van een programma voor loopbaanoriëntatie op basis van de zelfconfrontatiemethode [Clarification of career-perspective; development and application of a program of career orientation based on the self-confrontation method]. Assen/Maastricht, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Loo, R. P. J. M. (2012). De stem van de dissonant: Stimulering van meerstemmigheid en dialoog bij teamontwikkeling [The voice of the dissonant: Stimulation of multivoicedness and dialogue in teamdevelopment]. In: F. Meijers (Ed.), Wiens verhaal telt? Naar een narratieve dialogische loopbaanbegeleiding [Whose story counts? Towards a narrative dialogical career coaching] (pp. 219–236). Antwerpen, Belgium: Garant.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Geelen, S. M. (2010). Understanding self-experience in adolescent chronic fatigue syndrome. Doctoral dissertation, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Loon, R., & Wijsbek, J. (Eds.). (2003). De Organisatie als Verhaal [The organization as story]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicker, A. W. (1979). Ecological psychology, some recent and prospective developments. American Psychologist, 34(9), 755–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wierdsma, A. (2004). Beyond implementation: Co-creation in change and development. In J. J. Boonstra (Ed.), Dynamics of organizational change and learning (pp. 227–257). Chichester, UK: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijsbek, J. (2003) De organisatie als verhaal [The organization as story]. In R. Van Loon & J. Wijsbek (Eds.), De Organisatie als Verhaal [The organization as story]. (pp. 76–106). Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijsbek, J. (2009). De dialogische organisatie [The dialogical organization]. Assen, The Netherlands: Van Gorcum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zomer, P. (2006). The Team Konfrontation method: Design, grounding and testing. Doctoral dissertation, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

I wish to thank Hubert Hermans for his helpful comment on the manuscript version of this chapter.

The SCM-Organization training course also includes a license to the special software needed for the application of this approach.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Richard van de Loo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

van de Loo, R. (2016). SCM-Organization: A Method for Assessing and Facilitating Organization Dialogue and Development. In: Hermans, H. (eds) Assessing and Stimulating a Dialogical Self in Groups, Teams, Cultures, and Organizations. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32482-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics