Syndrome Character and Regimes of Social Cohesion

Abstract

The first section of this chapter explores to what extent the nine dimensions empirically reflect the theoretically derived syndrome character of social cohesion. Factor analysis shows that eight of the nine dimensions belong to an underlying latent construct. A remnant of mechanic solidarity, identification is the only dimension that is empirically unrelated to the all-inclusive, universalistic character of social cohesion. The second section attempts to uncover distinct regimes of cohesion; these are groups of countries with similar strengths and weakness on the nine dimensions. Cluster analysis reveals six distinct country groups. The Nordic regime scores highest on most dimensions. It is outperformed by the regime of English-speaking and small Western European countries only in solidarity and helpfulness and respect for social rules. Slightly behind, yet above average on all dimensions but identification, is the Northwestern European regime. These three regimes can be regarded role models of strong cohesion. The remaining and underperforming distinct profiles are those of the Mediterranean and Eastern European countries, the Levantine regime, and the Southeastern European one.